Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
McLaren strategy
McLaren strategy
A couple of questions: one regarding Lewis and one on Heikki
Lewis first: Bridgestone has said that they noticed a structural
issue with Lewis's tyres after Friday practice, and McLaren have said
this is why they 3 stopped him. Yet it seems (to me at least) that he
qualified on the fuel for a 2 stopper. If so, this seems like a late
change in strategy.
Heikki: he came in for a stop on around lap 26. The fuel timing
caption said that he was fueled to the end but the team knew he would
have to stop again to change on to the soft tyres. When he did stop
again the also fueled him up. I was wondering if the caption was
wrong, but it was a very long stop (of 9 - 10 seconds).
Any thoughts, comments or answers regarding the above?
A couple of questions: one regarding Lewis and one on Heikki
Lewis first: Bridgestone has said that they noticed a structural
issue with Lewis's tyres after Friday practice, and McLaren have said
this is why they 3 stopped him. Yet it seems (to me at least) that he
qualified on the fuel for a 2 stopper. If so, this seems like a late
change in strategy.
Heikki: he came in for a stop on around lap 26. The fuel timing
caption said that he was fueled to the end but the team knew he would
have to stop again to change on to the soft tyres. When he did stop
again the also fueled him up. I was wondering if the caption was
wrong, but it was a very long stop (of 9 - 10 seconds).
Any thoughts, comments or answers regarding the above?
Re: McLaren strategy
Tommo wrote:
> A couple of questions: one regarding Lewis and one on Heikki
>
> Lewis first: Bridgestone has said that they noticed a structural
> issue with Lewis's tyres after Friday practice, and McLaren have said
> this is why they 3 stopped him. Yet it seems (to me at least) that he
> qualified on the fuel for a 2 stopper. If so, this seems like a late
> change in strategy.
>
> Heikki: he came in for a stop on around lap 26. The fuel timing
> caption said that he was fueled to the end but the team knew he would
> have to stop again to change on to the soft tyres. When he did stop
> again the also fueled him up. I was wondering if the caption was
> wrong, but it was a very long stop (of 9 - 10 seconds).
>
>
> Any thoughts, comments or answers regarding the above?
He qualified on 3 stop fuel.
The caption is a guesstimate based on the approximated time the fuel
hose was on. I wouldn't rely on it.
--
Pitwall is an online F1 manager game where you receive a team and need
to develop the team to get on the top podium position! Pitwall is
entirely free! No sh*t!
* tinyurl . com /5y6ls3
Tommo wrote:
> A couple of questions: one regarding Lewis and one on Heikki
>
> Lewis first: Bridgestone has said that they noticed a structural
> issue with Lewis's tyres after Friday practice, and McLaren have said
> this is why they 3 stopped him. Yet it seems (to me at least) that he
> qualified on the fuel for a 2 stopper. If so, this seems like a late
> change in strategy.
>
> Heikki: he came in for a stop on around lap 26. The fuel timing
> caption said that he was fueled to the end but the team knew he would
> have to stop again to change on to the soft tyres. When he did stop
> again the also fueled him up. I was wondering if the caption was
> wrong, but it was a very long stop (of 9 - 10 seconds).
>
>
> Any thoughts, comments or answers regarding the above?
He qualified on 3 stop fuel.
The caption is a guesstimate based on the approximated time the fuel
hose was on. I wouldn't rely on it.
--
Pitwall is an online F1 manager game where you receive a team and need
to develop the team to get on the top podium position! Pitwall is
entirely free! No sh*t!
* tinyurl . com /5y6ls3
Re: McLaren strategy
"Bigbird" <Bigbird.UsenetREMOVTHS@Gmail . com > wrote in
news:xn0fq2gxmtji5i00e@news.individual . net :
> Tommo wrote:
>
>> A couple of questions: one regarding Lewis and one on Heikki
>>
>> Lewis first: Bridgestone has said that they noticed a structural
>> issue with Lewis's tyres after Friday practice, and McLaren have said
>> this is why they 3 stopped him. Yet it seems (to me at least) that he
>> qualified on the fuel for a 2 stopper. If so, this seems like a late
>> change in strategy.
>>
>> Heikki: he came in for a stop on around lap 26. The fuel timing
>> caption said that he was fueled to the end but the team knew he would
>> have to stop again to change on to the soft tyres. When he did stop
>> again the also fueled him up. I was wondering if the caption was
>> wrong, but it was a very long stop (of 9 - 10 seconds).
>>
>>
>> Any thoughts, comments or answers regarding the above?
>
> He qualified on 3 stop fuel.
>
> The caption is a guesstimate based on the approximated time the fuel
> hose was on. I wouldn't rely on it.
>
In fact if you look at the fueling nozzle and the timer, you will see
how badly it's done. It *might* be accurate within +/-.5 seconds at
best.
"Bigbird" <Bigbird.UsenetREMOVTHS@Gmail . com > wrote in
news:xn0fq2gxmtji5i00e@news.individual . net :
> Tommo wrote:
>
>> A couple of questions: one regarding Lewis and one on Heikki
>>
>> Lewis first: Bridgestone has said that they noticed a structural
>> issue with Lewis's tyres after Friday practice, and McLaren have said
>> this is why they 3 stopped him. Yet it seems (to me at least) that he
>> qualified on the fuel for a 2 stopper. If so, this seems like a late
>> change in strategy.
>>
>> Heikki: he came in for a stop on around lap 26. The fuel timing
>> caption said that he was fueled to the end but the team knew he would
>> have to stop again to change on to the soft tyres. When he did stop
>> again the also fueled him up. I was wondering if the caption was
>> wrong, but it was a very long stop (of 9 - 10 seconds).
>>
>>
>> Any thoughts, comments or answers regarding the above?
>
> He qualified on 3 stop fuel.
>
> The caption is a guesstimate based on the approximated time the fuel
> hose was on. I wouldn't rely on it.
>
In fact if you look at the fueling nozzle and the timer, you will see
how badly it's done. It *might* be accurate within +/-.5 seconds at
best.
Re: McLaren strategy
"Steal Bruce McLaren's legacy.
Cheat. Cheat. Cheat.
Suck.
Suck even harder.
Cheat. Steal. Cheat.
Evade true sanction.
Cheat.
Suck more.
Cheat.
Suck like the interstellar void.
Get bought out by Mercedes.
Suck up their own ass and disappear, like BAR.
Leave the sour stench of cheating pervading the whole enterprise unto
eternity.
(c) 2008 MJF/All That Fancy Paints As Fair
--
"Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?"
"Steal Bruce McLaren's legacy.
Cheat. Cheat. Cheat.
Suck.
Suck even harder.
Cheat. Steal. Cheat.
Evade true sanction.
Cheat.
Suck more.
Cheat.
Suck like the interstellar void.
Get bought out by Mercedes.
Suck up their own ass and disappear, like BAR.
Leave the sour stench of cheating pervading the whole enterprise unto
eternity.
(c) 2008 MJF/All That Fancy Paints As Fair
--
"Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?"
Re: McLaren strategy
"Raoul Duke" <Owl.Farm@Woody.Creek> wrote in message
news:us1f241damptnmapcragvgmhotogj7kgjt@4ax . com ...
>
> "Steal Bruce McLaren's legacy.
>
> Cheat. Cheat. Cheat.
>
> Suck.
>
> Suck even harder.
>
> Cheat. Steal. Cheat.
>
> Evade true sanction.
>
> Cheat.
>
> Suck more.
>
> Cheat.
>
> Suck like the interstellar void.
>
> Get bought out by Mercedes.
>
> Suck up their own ass and disappear, like BAR.
>
> Leave the sour stench of cheating pervading the whole enterprise unto
> eternity.
>
Whatever you're on I want some.
Peter R.
"Raoul Duke" <Owl.Farm@Woody.Creek> wrote in message
news:us1f241damptnmapcragvgmhotogj7kgjt@4ax . com ...
>
> "Steal Bruce McLaren's legacy.
>
> Cheat. Cheat. Cheat.
>
> Suck.
>
> Suck even harder.
>
> Cheat. Steal. Cheat.
>
> Evade true sanction.
>
> Cheat.
>
> Suck more.
>
> Cheat.
>
> Suck like the interstellar void.
>
> Get bought out by Mercedes.
>
> Suck up their own ass and disappear, like BAR.
>
> Leave the sour stench of cheating pervading the whole enterprise unto
> eternity.
>
Whatever you're on I want some.
Peter R.
Re: McLaren strategy
Raoul Duke wrote:
> "Steal Bruce McLaren's legacy.
>
> Cheat. Cheat. Cheat.
>
any comments on australian gp 2007.?
didnt think so
dumbass
Raoul Duke wrote:
> "Steal Bruce McLaren's legacy.
>
> Cheat. Cheat. Cheat.
>
any comments on australian gp 2007.?
didnt think so
dumbass
Re: McLaren strategy
On Mon, 12 May 2008 09:50:23 +0200, RzR <2r4z0r2@gmail . com > wrote:
>Raoul Duke wrote:
>> "Steal Bruce McLaren's legacy.
>>
>> Cheat. Cheat. Cheat.
>
>any comments on australian gp 2007.?
>
>didnt think so
>
>dumbass
What do you care to discuss regarding Australia 2007?
...McLaren's mole at Ferrari, perhaps?
--
"Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?"
On Mon, 12 May 2008 09:50:23 +0200, RzR <2r4z0r2@gmail . com > wrote:
>Raoul Duke wrote:
>> "Steal Bruce McLaren's legacy.
>>
>> Cheat. Cheat. Cheat.
>
>any comments on australian gp 2007.?
>
>didnt think so
>
>dumbass
What do you care to discuss regarding Australia 2007?
...McLaren's mole at Ferrari, perhaps?
--
"Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?"
Re: McLaren strategy
"Raoul Duke" <Owl.Farm@Woody.Creek> wrote in message
news:us1f241damptnmapcragvgmhotogj7kgjt@4ax . com ...
>
> "Steal Bruce McLaren's legacy.
>
I bet Bruce is so pleased *you* are sticking up for his legacy.
AC
"Raoul Duke" <Owl.Farm@Woody.Creek> wrote in message
news:us1f241damptnmapcragvgmhotogj7kgjt@4ax . com ...
>
> "Steal Bruce McLaren's legacy.
>
I bet Bruce is so pleased *you* are sticking up for his legacy.
AC
Re: McLaren strategy
Raoul Duke wrote:
> Leave the sour stench of cheating pervading the whole enterprise unto
> eternity.
>
> (c) 2008 MJF/All That Fancy Paints As Fair
Could you *be* any more of a tedious fuck these days? At least Sweeney
was funny, albeit inadvertently.
Raoul Duke wrote:
> Leave the sour stench of cheating pervading the whole enterprise unto
> eternity.
>
> (c) 2008 MJF/All That Fancy Paints As Fair
Could you *be* any more of a tedious fuck these days? At least Sweeney
was funny, albeit inadvertently.
