Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
Spain report card
Raoul Duke wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:54:55 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
> wrote:
> > Bigbird wrote:
> >> Raoul Duke wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:44:08 -0700 (PDT), DrEvil
> <mph2001@my-deja . com > >>> wrote:
> >>>> Kimi was always able to pull 0.3-0.4s a lap on Massa at will when
> >>>> needed and this while running heavier.
> >>> 1 lap heavier at best, and every time Massa came back within
> >>> thousandths.
> > > >
> >>
> >> Yup, just 3752 thousandth adrift after 22 laps...
> > >
> >> and then he did it again after the SC.
> >>
> >>
> * w w w .fia . com /resources/documents/1201241668__ESP_08_Race_History
> _Chart.pdf >> >> Did someone really take this dipshit seriously.
> >
> > Rearrange this well known phrase: "straws Clutching at."
>
> Are you two fucking imbeciles really too abjectly stupid to comprehend
> the disadvantage in following in an equal modern F1 car?
>
Well I expect you don't get much of a tow down the straight from 3752
thousandths back. LOL.
> In addition to not understanding your own reference.
>
Someone want to explain to the fuckwit? I have embarrassed him far too
often for him to risk his delicate ego reading my piss takes.
> Really?
--
Pitwall is an online F1 manager game where you receive a team and need
to develop the team to get on the top podium position! Pitwall is
entirely free! No sh*t!
* tinyurl . com /5y6ls3
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:54:55 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
> wrote:
> > Bigbird wrote:
> >> Raoul Duke wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:44:08 -0700 (PDT), DrEvil
> <mph2001@my-deja . com > >>> wrote:
> >>>> Kimi was always able to pull 0.3-0.4s a lap on Massa at will when
> >>>> needed and this while running heavier.
> >>> 1 lap heavier at best, and every time Massa came back within
> >>> thousandths.
> > > >
> >>
> >> Yup, just 3752 thousandth adrift after 22 laps...
> > >
> >> and then he did it again after the SC.
> >>
> >>
> * w w w .fia . com /resources/documents/1201241668__ESP_08_Race_History
> _Chart.pdf >> >> Did someone really take this dipshit seriously.
> >
> > Rearrange this well known phrase: "straws Clutching at."
>
> Are you two fucking imbeciles really too abjectly stupid to comprehend
> the disadvantage in following in an equal modern F1 car?
>
Well I expect you don't get much of a tow down the straight from 3752
thousandths back. LOL.
> In addition to not understanding your own reference.
>
Someone want to explain to the fuckwit? I have embarrassed him far too
often for him to risk his delicate ego reading my piss takes.
> Really?
--
Pitwall is an online F1 manager game where you receive a team and need
to develop the team to get on the top podium position! Pitwall is
entirely free! No sh*t!
* tinyurl . com /5y6ls3
Raoul Duke wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:54:55 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
> wrote:
>> Bigbird wrote:
>>> Raoul Duke wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:44:08 -0700 (PDT), DrEvil <mph2001@my-deja . com >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Kimi was always able to pull 0.3-0.4s a lap on Massa at will when
>>>>> needed and this while running heavier.
>>>> 1 lap heavier at best, and every time Massa came back within
>>>> thousandths.
>>>>
>>> Yup, just 3752 thousandth adrift after 22 laps...
>>>
>>> and then he did it again after the SC.
>>>
>>> * w w w .fia . com /resources/documents/1201241668__ESP_08_Race_History_Chart.pdf
>>>
>>> Did someone really take this dipshit seriously.
>> Rearrange this well known phrase: "straws Clutching at."
>
> Are you two fucking imbeciles really too abjectly stupid to comprehend
> the disadvantage in following in an equal modern F1 car?
Hahaha. It's just too easy to get you all wound up. "If you're within 1
- 2s you damage your tyres" - Hamilton - which explains why Massa was
nearly 4s behind, he was just playing safe. Or perhaps he had no hope of
winning, and therefore no point in trying to get close to Kimi "I could
have easily gone much faster if I had to" Raikonnen.
--
Phil
* w w w .flickr . com /photos/tmc1979/
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:54:55 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
> wrote:
>> Bigbird wrote:
>>> Raoul Duke wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:44:08 -0700 (PDT), DrEvil <mph2001@my-deja . com >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Kimi was always able to pull 0.3-0.4s a lap on Massa at will when
>>>>> needed and this while running heavier.
>>>> 1 lap heavier at best, and every time Massa came back within
>>>> thousandths.
>>>>
>>> Yup, just 3752 thousandth adrift after 22 laps...
>>>
>>> and then he did it again after the SC.
>>>
>>> * w w w .fia . com /resources/documents/1201241668__ESP_08_Race_History_Chart.pdf
>>>
>>> Did someone really take this dipshit seriously.
>> Rearrange this well known phrase: "straws Clutching at."
>
> Are you two fucking imbeciles really too abjectly stupid to comprehend
> the disadvantage in following in an equal modern F1 car?
Hahaha. It's just too easy to get you all wound up. "If you're within 1
- 2s you damage your tyres" - Hamilton - which explains why Massa was
nearly 4s behind, he was just playing safe. Or perhaps he had no hope of
winning, and therefore no point in trying to get close to Kimi "I could
have easily gone much faster if I had to" Raikonnen.
--
Phil
* w w w .flickr . com /photos/tmc1979/
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:46:45 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
wrote:
>Raoul Duke wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:54:55 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
>> wrote:
>>> Bigbird wrote:
>>>> Raoul Duke wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:44:08 -0700 (PDT), DrEvil <mph2001@my-deja . com >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Kimi was always able to pull 0.3-0.4s a lap on Massa at will when
>>>>>> needed and this while running heavier.
>>>>> 1 lap heavier at best, and every time Massa came back within
>>>>> thousandths.
>>>>>
>>>> Yup, just 3752 thousandth adrift after 22 laps...
>>>>
>>>> and then he did it again after the SC.
>>>>
>>>> * w w w .fia . com /resources/documents/1201241668__ESP_08_Race_History_Chart.pdf
>>>>
>>>> Did someone really take this dipshit seriously.
>>> Rearrange this well known phrase: "straws Clutching at."
>>
>> Are you two fucking imbeciles really too abjectly stupid to comprehend
>> the disadvantage in following in an equal modern F1 car?
>
>Hahaha. It's just too easy to get you all wound up. "If you're within 1
>- 2s you damage your tyres" - Hamilton - which explains why Massa was
>nearly 4s behind, he was just playing safe. Or perhaps he had no hope of
>winning, and therefore no point in trying to get close to Kimi "I could
>have easily gone much faster if I had to" Raikonnen.
Piss off you uncomprehending poltroon.
--
"Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?"
wrote:
>Raoul Duke wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:54:55 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
>> wrote:
>>> Bigbird wrote:
>>>> Raoul Duke wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:44:08 -0700 (PDT), DrEvil <mph2001@my-deja . com >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Kimi was always able to pull 0.3-0.4s a lap on Massa at will when
>>>>>> needed and this while running heavier.
>>>>> 1 lap heavier at best, and every time Massa came back within
>>>>> thousandths.
>>>>>
>>>> Yup, just 3752 thousandth adrift after 22 laps...
>>>>
>>>> and then he did it again after the SC.
>>>>
>>>> * w w w .fia . com /resources/documents/1201241668__ESP_08_Race_History_Chart.pdf
>>>>
>>>> Did someone really take this dipshit seriously.
>>> Rearrange this well known phrase: "straws Clutching at."
>>
>> Are you two fucking imbeciles really too abjectly stupid to comprehend
>> the disadvantage in following in an equal modern F1 car?
>
>Hahaha. It's just too easy to get you all wound up. "If you're within 1
>- 2s you damage your tyres" - Hamilton - which explains why Massa was
>nearly 4s behind, he was just playing safe. Or perhaps he had no hope of
>winning, and therefore no point in trying to get close to Kimi "I could
>have easily gone much faster if I had to" Raikonnen.
Piss off you uncomprehending poltroon.
--
"Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?"
Raoul Duke wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:46:45 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
> wrote:
> > Raoul Duke wrote:
> >> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:54:55 +0200, Phil Newnham
> <pnewnham@yahoo . com > >> wrote:
> >>> Bigbird wrote:
> >>>> Raoul Duke wrote:
> > > > >
> >>>>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:44:08 -0700 (PDT), DrEvil
> <mph2001@my-deja . com > >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> Kimi was always able to pull 0.3-0.4s a lap on Massa at will
> when >>>>>> needed and this while running heavier.
> >>>>> 1 lap heavier at best, and every time Massa came back within
> >>>>> thousandths.
> > > > > >
> >>>> Yup, just 3752 thousandth adrift after 22 laps...
> > > > >
> >>>> and then he did it again after the SC.
> > > > >
> >>>>
>
* w w w .fia . com /resources/documents/1201241668__ESP_08_Race_History_Chart.pdf
> > > > >
> >>>> Did someone really take this dipshit seriously.
> >>> Rearrange this well known phrase: "straws Clutching at."
> >>
> >> Are you two fucking imbeciles really too abjectly stupid to
> comprehend >> the disadvantage in following in an equal modern F1 car?
> >
> > Hahaha. It's just too easy to get you all wound up. "If you're
> > within 1 - 2s you damage your tyres" - Hamilton - which explains
> > why Massa was nearly 4s behind, he was just playing safe. Or
> > perhaps he had no hope of winning, and therefore no point in trying
> > to get close to Kimi "I could have easily gone much faster if I had
> > to" Raikonnen.
>
> Piss off you uncomprehending poltroon.
Perhaps you'd demonstrate your "comprehension". It's a slow day and we
could all do with a laugh.
More pressure on the pillow next time nurse.
--
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:46:45 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
> wrote:
> > Raoul Duke wrote:
> >> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:54:55 +0200, Phil Newnham
> <pnewnham@yahoo . com > >> wrote:
> >>> Bigbird wrote:
> >>>> Raoul Duke wrote:
> > > > >
> >>>>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:44:08 -0700 (PDT), DrEvil
> <mph2001@my-deja . com > >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> Kimi was always able to pull 0.3-0.4s a lap on Massa at will
> when >>>>>> needed and this while running heavier.
> >>>>> 1 lap heavier at best, and every time Massa came back within
> >>>>> thousandths.
> > > > > >
> >>>> Yup, just 3752 thousandth adrift after 22 laps...
> > > > >
> >>>> and then he did it again after the SC.
> > > > >
> >>>>
>
* w w w .fia . com /resources/documents/1201241668__ESP_08_Race_History_Chart.pdf
> > > > >
> >>>> Did someone really take this dipshit seriously.
> >>> Rearrange this well known phrase: "straws Clutching at."
> >>
> >> Are you two fucking imbeciles really too abjectly stupid to
> comprehend >> the disadvantage in following in an equal modern F1 car?
> >
> > Hahaha. It's just too easy to get you all wound up. "If you're
> > within 1 - 2s you damage your tyres" - Hamilton - which explains
> > why Massa was nearly 4s behind, he was just playing safe. Or
> > perhaps he had no hope of winning, and therefore no point in trying
> > to get close to Kimi "I could have easily gone much faster if I had
> > to" Raikonnen.
>
> Piss off you uncomprehending poltroon.
Perhaps you'd demonstrate your "comprehension". It's a slow day and we
could all do with a laugh.
More pressure on the pillow next time nurse.
--
Raoul Duke wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:46:45 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
> wrote:
>> Raoul Duke wrote:
>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:54:55 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
>>> wrote:
>>>> Bigbird wrote:
>>>>> Raoul Duke wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:44:08 -0700 (PDT), DrEvil <mph2001@my-deja . com >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Kimi was always able to pull 0.3-0.4s a lap on Massa at will when
>>>>>>> needed and this while running heavier.
>>>>>> 1 lap heavier at best, and every time Massa came back within
>>>>>> thousandths.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yup, just 3752 thousandth adrift after 22 laps...
>>>>>
>>>>> and then he did it again after the SC.
>>>>>
>>>>> * w w w .fia . com /resources/documents/1201241668__ESP_08_Race_History_Chart.pdf
>>>>>
>>>>> Did someone really take this dipshit seriously.
>>>> Rearrange this well known phrase: "straws Clutching at."
>>> Are you two fucking imbeciles really too abjectly stupid to comprehend
>>> the disadvantage in following in an equal modern F1 car?
>> Hahaha. It's just too easy to get you all wound up. "If you're within 1
>> - 2s you damage your tyres" - Hamilton - which explains why Massa was
>> nearly 4s behind, he was just playing safe. Or perhaps he had no hope of
>> winning, and therefore no point in trying to get close to Kimi "I could
>> have easily gone much faster if I had to" Raikonnen.
>
> Piss off you uncomprehending poltroon.
Hahahaha. Hurts, doesn't it? So why in your opinion was Massa unable to
get near Kimi all weekend? Kimi was faster than Massa in every session
except Saturday warmup, when Ferrari clearly weren't trying at all.
Massa couldn't even manage a consolation fastest race lap.
--
Phil
* w w w .flickr . com /photos/tmc1979/
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:46:45 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
> wrote:
>> Raoul Duke wrote:
>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:54:55 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
>>> wrote:
>>>> Bigbird wrote:
>>>>> Raoul Duke wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:44:08 -0700 (PDT), DrEvil <mph2001@my-deja . com >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Kimi was always able to pull 0.3-0.4s a lap on Massa at will when
>>>>>>> needed and this while running heavier.
>>>>>> 1 lap heavier at best, and every time Massa came back within
>>>>>> thousandths.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yup, just 3752 thousandth adrift after 22 laps...
>>>>>
>>>>> and then he did it again after the SC.
>>>>>
>>>>> * w w w .fia . com /resources/documents/1201241668__ESP_08_Race_History_Chart.pdf
>>>>>
>>>>> Did someone really take this dipshit seriously.
>>>> Rearrange this well known phrase: "straws Clutching at."
>>> Are you two fucking imbeciles really too abjectly stupid to comprehend
>>> the disadvantage in following in an equal modern F1 car?
>> Hahaha. It's just too easy to get you all wound up. "If you're within 1
>> - 2s you damage your tyres" - Hamilton - which explains why Massa was
>> nearly 4s behind, he was just playing safe. Or perhaps he had no hope of
>> winning, and therefore no point in trying to get close to Kimi "I could
>> have easily gone much faster if I had to" Raikonnen.
>
> Piss off you uncomprehending poltroon.
Hahahaha. Hurts, doesn't it? So why in your opinion was Massa unable to
get near Kimi all weekend? Kimi was faster than Massa in every session
except Saturday warmup, when Ferrari clearly weren't trying at all.
Massa couldn't even manage a consolation fastest race lap.
--
Phil
* w w w .flickr . com /photos/tmc1979/
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:42:11 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
wrote:
>Raoul Duke wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:46:45 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
>> wrote:
>>> Raoul Duke wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:54:55 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Bigbird wrote:
>>>>>> Raoul Duke wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:44:08 -0700 (PDT), DrEvil <mph2001@my-deja . com >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Kimi was always able to pull 0.3-0.4s a lap on Massa at will when
>>>>>>>> needed and this while running heavier.
>>>>>>> 1 lap heavier at best, and every time Massa came back within
>>>>>>> thousandths.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yup, just 3752 thousandth adrift after 22 laps...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and then he did it again after the SC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * w w w .fia . com /resources/documents/1201241668__ESP_08_Race_History_Chart.pdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did someone really take this dipshit seriously.
>>>>> Rearrange this well known phrase: "straws Clutching at."
>>>> Are you two fucking imbeciles really too abjectly stupid to comprehend
>>>> the disadvantage in following in an equal modern F1 car?
>>> Hahaha. It's just too easy to get you all wound up. "If you're within 1
>>> - 2s you damage your tyres" - Hamilton - which explains why Massa was
>>> nearly 4s behind, he was just playing safe. Or perhaps he had no hope of
>>> winning, and therefore no point in trying to get close to Kimi "I could
>>> have easily gone much faster if I had to" Raikonnen.
>>
>> Piss off you uncomprehending poltroon.
>
>Hahahaha. Hurts, doesn't it? So why in your opinion was Massa unable to
>get near Kimi all weekend? Kimi was faster than Massa in every session
>except Saturday warmup, when Ferrari clearly weren't trying at all.
>Massa couldn't even manage a consolation fastest race lap.
In the race there wasn't a handkerchief's difference between them on
lap time.
--
"Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?"
wrote:
>Raoul Duke wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:46:45 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
>> wrote:
>>> Raoul Duke wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:54:55 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Bigbird wrote:
>>>>>> Raoul Duke wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:44:08 -0700 (PDT), DrEvil <mph2001@my-deja . com >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Kimi was always able to pull 0.3-0.4s a lap on Massa at will when
>>>>>>>> needed and this while running heavier.
>>>>>>> 1 lap heavier at best, and every time Massa came back within
>>>>>>> thousandths.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yup, just 3752 thousandth adrift after 22 laps...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and then he did it again after the SC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * w w w .fia . com /resources/documents/1201241668__ESP_08_Race_History_Chart.pdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did someone really take this dipshit seriously.
>>>>> Rearrange this well known phrase: "straws Clutching at."
>>>> Are you two fucking imbeciles really too abjectly stupid to comprehend
>>>> the disadvantage in following in an equal modern F1 car?
>>> Hahaha. It's just too easy to get you all wound up. "If you're within 1
>>> - 2s you damage your tyres" - Hamilton - which explains why Massa was
>>> nearly 4s behind, he was just playing safe. Or perhaps he had no hope of
>>> winning, and therefore no point in trying to get close to Kimi "I could
>>> have easily gone much faster if I had to" Raikonnen.
>>
>> Piss off you uncomprehending poltroon.
>
>Hahahaha. Hurts, doesn't it? So why in your opinion was Massa unable to
>get near Kimi all weekend? Kimi was faster than Massa in every session
>except Saturday warmup, when Ferrari clearly weren't trying at all.
>Massa couldn't even manage a consolation fastest race lap.
In the race there wasn't a handkerchief's difference between them on
lap time.
--
"Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?"
X-No-Archive: Yes
On 1 touko, 03:00, Raoul Duke <Owl.F...@Woody.Creek> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:42:11 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewn...@yahoo . com >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >Raoul Duke wrote:
> >> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:46:45 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewn...@yahoo . com >
> >> wrote:
> >>> Raoul Duke wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:54:55 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewn...@yahoo . com >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> Bigbird wrote:
> >>>>>> Raoul Duke wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:44:08 -0700 (PDT), DrEvil <mph2...@my-deja . com >
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Kimi was always able to pull 0.3-0.4s a lap on Massa at will when
> >>>>>>>> needed and this while running heavier.
> >>>>>>> 1 lap heavier at best, and every time Massa came back within
> >>>>>>> thousandths.
>
> >>>>>> Yup, just 3752 thousandth adrift after 22 laps...
>
> >>>>>> and then he did it again after the SC.
>
> >>>>>> * w w w .fia . com /resources/documents/1201241668__ESP_08_Race_Histor...
>
> >>>>>> Did someone really take this dipshit seriously.
> >>>>> Rearrange this well known phrase: "straws Clutching at."
> >>>> Are you two fucking imbeciles really too abjectly stupid to comprehend
> >>>> the disadvantage in following in an equal modern F1 car?
> >>> Hahaha. It's just too easy to get you all wound up. "If you're within 1
> >>> - 2s you damage your tyres" - Hamilton - which explains why Massa was
> >>> nearly 4s behind, he was just playing safe. Or perhaps he had no hope of
> >>> winning, and therefore no point in trying to get close to Kimi "I could
> >>> have easily gone much faster if I had to" Raikonnen.
>
> >> Piss off you uncomprehending poltroon.
>
> >Hahahaha. Hurts, doesn't it? So why in your opinion was Massa unable to
> >get near Kimi all weekend? Kimi was faster than Massa in every session
> >except Saturday warmup, when Ferrari clearly weren't trying at all.
> >Massa couldn't even manage a consolation fastest race lap.
>
> In the race there wasn't a handkerchief's difference between them on
> lap time.
>
"Handkerchief" ROTFL.
On the first stint if we leave out two laps behind SC Kimi was faster
than Massa on 14 laps whereas Massa had ONLY TWO laps that were faster
than Kimi's and those were with a LIGHTER CAR. Kimi was ahead by about
four seconds when Massa pitted.
On second stint Kimi had 14 laps faster than Massa and Massa FOUR laps
faster than Kimi.
Your little boy got PWNED the whole weekend. Deal with it lardy.
On 1 touko, 03:00, Raoul Duke <Owl.F...@Woody.Creek> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:42:11 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewn...@yahoo . com >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >Raoul Duke wrote:
> >> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:46:45 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewn...@yahoo . com >
> >> wrote:
> >>> Raoul Duke wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:54:55 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewn...@yahoo . com >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> Bigbird wrote:
> >>>>>> Raoul Duke wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:44:08 -0700 (PDT), DrEvil <mph2...@my-deja . com >
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Kimi was always able to pull 0.3-0.4s a lap on Massa at will when
> >>>>>>>> needed and this while running heavier.
> >>>>>>> 1 lap heavier at best, and every time Massa came back within
> >>>>>>> thousandths.
>
> >>>>>> Yup, just 3752 thousandth adrift after 22 laps...
>
> >>>>>> and then he did it again after the SC.
>
> >>>>>> * w w w .fia . com /resources/documents/1201241668__ESP_08_Race_Histor...
>
> >>>>>> Did someone really take this dipshit seriously.
> >>>>> Rearrange this well known phrase: "straws Clutching at."
> >>>> Are you two fucking imbeciles really too abjectly stupid to comprehend
> >>>> the disadvantage in following in an equal modern F1 car?
> >>> Hahaha. It's just too easy to get you all wound up. "If you're within 1
> >>> - 2s you damage your tyres" - Hamilton - which explains why Massa was
> >>> nearly 4s behind, he was just playing safe. Or perhaps he had no hope of
> >>> winning, and therefore no point in trying to get close to Kimi "I could
> >>> have easily gone much faster if I had to" Raikonnen.
>
> >> Piss off you uncomprehending poltroon.
>
> >Hahahaha. Hurts, doesn't it? So why in your opinion was Massa unable to
> >get near Kimi all weekend? Kimi was faster than Massa in every session
> >except Saturday warmup, when Ferrari clearly weren't trying at all.
> >Massa couldn't even manage a consolation fastest race lap.
>
> In the race there wasn't a handkerchief's difference between them on
> lap time.
>
"Handkerchief" ROTFL.
On the first stint if we leave out two laps behind SC Kimi was faster
than Massa on 14 laps whereas Massa had ONLY TWO laps that were faster
than Kimi's and those were with a LIGHTER CAR. Kimi was ahead by about
four seconds when Massa pitted.
On second stint Kimi had 14 laps faster than Massa and Massa FOUR laps
faster than Kimi.
Your little boy got PWNED the whole weekend. Deal with it lardy.
Raoul Duke wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:42:11 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
> wrote:
>> Raoul Duke wrote:
>>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:46:45 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
>>> wrote:
>>>> Raoul Duke wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:54:55 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Bigbird wrote:
>>>>>>> Raoul Duke wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:44:08 -0700 (PDT), DrEvil <mph2001@my-deja . com >
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Kimi was always able to pull 0.3-0.4s a lap on Massa at will when
>>>>>>>>> needed and this while running heavier.
>>>>>>>> 1 lap heavier at best, and every time Massa came back within
>>>>>>>> thousandths.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yup, just 3752 thousandth adrift after 22 laps...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and then he did it again after the SC.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * w w w .fia . com /resources/documents/1201241668__ESP_08_Race_History_Chart.pdf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Did someone really take this dipshit seriously.
>>>>>> Rearrange this well known phrase: "straws Clutching at."
>>>>> Are you two fucking imbeciles really too abjectly stupid to comprehend
>>>>> the disadvantage in following in an equal modern F1 car?
>>>> Hahaha. It's just too easy to get you all wound up. "If you're within 1
>>>> - 2s you damage your tyres" - Hamilton - which explains why Massa was
>>>> nearly 4s behind, he was just playing safe. Or perhaps he had no hope of
>>>> winning, and therefore no point in trying to get close to Kimi "I could
>>>> have easily gone much faster if I had to" Raikonnen.
>>> Piss off you uncomprehending poltroon.
>> Hahahaha. Hurts, doesn't it? So why in your opinion was Massa unable to
>> get near Kimi all weekend? Kimi was faster than Massa in every session
>> except Saturday warmup, when Ferrari clearly weren't trying at all.
>> Massa couldn't even manage a consolation fastest race lap.
>
> In the race there wasn't a handkerchief's difference between them on
> lap time.
So what? That's probably because Kimi knew there was no threat.
--
Phil
* w w w .flickr . com /photos/tmc1979/
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:42:11 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
> wrote:
>> Raoul Duke wrote:
>>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:46:45 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
>>> wrote:
>>>> Raoul Duke wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:54:55 +0200, Phil Newnham <pnewnham@yahoo . com >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Bigbird wrote:
>>>>>>> Raoul Duke wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:44:08 -0700 (PDT), DrEvil <mph2001@my-deja . com >
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Kimi was always able to pull 0.3-0.4s a lap on Massa at will when
>>>>>>>>> needed and this while running heavier.
>>>>>>>> 1 lap heavier at best, and every time Massa came back within
>>>>>>>> thousandths.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yup, just 3752 thousandth adrift after 22 laps...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and then he did it again after the SC.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * w w w .fia . com /resources/documents/1201241668__ESP_08_Race_History_Chart.pdf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Did someone really take this dipshit seriously.
>>>>>> Rearrange this well known phrase: "straws Clutching at."
>>>>> Are you two fucking imbeciles really too abjectly stupid to comprehend
>>>>> the disadvantage in following in an equal modern F1 car?
>>>> Hahaha. It's just too easy to get you all wound up. "If you're within 1
>>>> - 2s you damage your tyres" - Hamilton - which explains why Massa was
>>>> nearly 4s behind, he was just playing safe. Or perhaps he had no hope of
>>>> winning, and therefore no point in trying to get close to Kimi "I could
>>>> have easily gone much faster if I had to" Raikonnen.
>>> Piss off you uncomprehending poltroon.
>> Hahahaha. Hurts, doesn't it? So why in your opinion was Massa unable to
>> get near Kimi all weekend? Kimi was faster than Massa in every session
>> except Saturday warmup, when Ferrari clearly weren't trying at all.
>> Massa couldn't even manage a consolation fastest race lap.
>
> In the race there wasn't a handkerchief's difference between them on
> lap time.
So what? That's probably because Kimi knew there was no threat.
--
Phil
* w w w .flickr . com /photos/tmc1979/
On Apr 27, 6:44 pm, DrEvil <mph2...@my-deja . com > wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> On 28 huhti, 01:09, Raoul Duke <Owl.F...@Woody.Creek> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:41:44 +0100, Richard Miller
>
> > <rich...@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> > >Ferrari: The perfect weekend. Pole position and a 1-2 finish. As between
> > >the two of them, Kimi once again demonstrated why he and not Massa is
> > >the world champion and the favourite for this year.
>
> > Run that by me again?
>
> > They were running within thousandths of a second all race.
>
> Kimi was always able to pull 0.3-0.4s a lap on Massa at will when
> needed and this while running heavier. But hey don't let facts ruin
> your racist hatred towards the Finn.
>
Finnish isn't a race.
> > If it weren't for the English engine rules we might have seen
> > something in the last stint.
>
> ROFL. If you really think Ferrari have ever let their drivers race
> after last pitstop I have a bridge to sell to you,
>
> > --
> > "Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?"
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> On 28 huhti, 01:09, Raoul Duke <Owl.F...@Woody.Creek> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:41:44 +0100, Richard Miller
>
> > <rich...@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> > >Ferrari: The perfect weekend. Pole position and a 1-2 finish. As between
> > >the two of them, Kimi once again demonstrated why he and not Massa is
> > >the world champion and the favourite for this year.
>
> > Run that by me again?
>
> > They were running within thousandths of a second all race.
>
> Kimi was always able to pull 0.3-0.4s a lap on Massa at will when
> needed and this while running heavier. But hey don't let facts ruin
> your racist hatred towards the Finn.
>
Finnish isn't a race.
> > If it weren't for the English engine rules we might have seen
> > something in the last stint.
>
> ROFL. If you really think Ferrari have ever let their drivers race
> after last pitstop I have a bridge to sell to you,
>
> > --
> > "Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?"
Lloyd wrote:
> On Apr 27, 6:44 pm, DrEvil <mph2...@my-deja . com > wrote:
>> X-No-Archive: Yes
>>
>> On 28 huhti, 01:09, Raoul Duke <Owl.F...@Woody.Creek> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:41:44 +0100, Richard Miller
>>> <rich...@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> Ferrari: The perfect weekend. Pole position and a 1-2 finish. As between
>>>> the two of them, Kimi once again demonstrated why he and not Massa is
>>>> the world champion and the favourite for this year.
>>> Run that by me again?
>>> They were running within thousandths of a second all race.
>> Kimi was always able to pull 0.3-0.4s a lap on Massa at will when
>> needed and this while running heavier. But hey don't let facts ruin
>> your racist hatred towards the Finn.
>>
>
> Finnish isn't a race.
>
???
--
"We always have hope of winning, because the others might lose..."
Monsieur Orgini - The Grand Prix of Gibraltar
> On Apr 27, 6:44 pm, DrEvil <mph2...@my-deja . com > wrote:
>> X-No-Archive: Yes
>>
>> On 28 huhti, 01:09, Raoul Duke <Owl.F...@Woody.Creek> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:41:44 +0100, Richard Miller
>>> <rich...@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> Ferrari: The perfect weekend. Pole position and a 1-2 finish. As between
>>>> the two of them, Kimi once again demonstrated why he and not Massa is
>>>> the world champion and the favourite for this year.
>>> Run that by me again?
>>> They were running within thousandths of a second all race.
>> Kimi was always able to pull 0.3-0.4s a lap on Massa at will when
>> needed and this while running heavier. But hey don't let facts ruin
>> your racist hatred towards the Finn.
>>
>
> Finnish isn't a race.
>
???
--
"We always have hope of winning, because the others might lose..."
Monsieur Orgini - The Grand Prix of Gibraltar
Lloyd wrote:
> Finnish isn't a race.
I think you're wrong about that--because almost every time I hear a
race of any kind covered by radio or TV, I hear them refer to the
Finnish line. QED.
> Finnish isn't a race.
I think you're wrong about that--because almost every time I hear a
race of any kind covered by radio or TV, I hear them refer to the
Finnish line. QED.
