Re: Hungary qualifying drama (could turn into a SPOILER)On Sun, 5 Aug 2007 11:05:03 +0100, Stephen M Baines
<usenet@localhost.kitschcamppalace.org.uk> wrote:
(snipping will no doubt bugger attributes, sorry and tough!)
>>>>It's a plausible explanation, but it certainly didn't *look* like Lewis
>>>>he was angry with at the time. Fault on both sides, maybe, and this is
>>>>the diplomatically agreed "line"?
>>>
>>>In light of the Stewards decision, it looks like they believed it as
>>>much as I do.
>>
>>er... given that the Stewards have penalised the whole team, I think
>>it entirely possible that they do believe it.
>
>Maybe I'm misreading the stewards notice, but it sounds to me like
>they don't believe it.
>
>"The explanation given by Alonso as to why at the expiration of the 20
>second period he remained in his pit stop position for a further 10
>seconds is *not accepted*. The Stewards find that he unnecessarily
>impeded another driver, Hamilton, and as a result he will be penalised
>by a loss of 5 grid positions.
This is about Alonso's claim that he was delayed by discussing tyre
changes. They had the radio transcript which proved this a lie, so
they didn't believe it. That doesn't seem to me to bear at all on what
Ron is saying about Lewis triggering the spat.
>
>The explanation given by the team as to why they kept Alonso
>stationary for 20 seconds after completion of his tyre change and
>therefore delayed Hamilton's own pit stop is *not accepted*."
Same as above, the explanation given by the team to the stewards isn't
the area that we were failing to believe, it's Ron's comments reported
in the press about how it all started.
>
>Maybe it was my reading of "not accepted" to say they didn't believe
>it in lieu of "not acceptable" to mean they believe it and don't want
>it happening.
I think we're just talking about different details of the story.
>
>> My instant reaction
>>was that Alonso had been a complete bastard and would be lucky to keep
>>his job.
>
>My thoughts were pretty much the same. I was only sorry not to have
>learnt any decent Swedish swear words yet.
If you listened *really* carefully, you could probably have learned
some Spanish ones. ;o)
>
>>> As much as the racing *is* actually racing this year,
>>>the politics around the year are seriously doing me in. The only
>>>saving grace at the moment is a lack of James Allen for me.
>>
>>He's better. No, really. There's less screaming and he shuts up for
>>some of the on-board stuff. And it has to be said, he *does* make
>>fewer mistakes than the Blessed Murray.
>
>I'll have to trust you on that :)
It's probably safest. Better still doesn't mean great. :o)
>
>>We had Damon instead of Martin yesterday. Didn't do a bad job for a
>>newbie. :o)
>
>Depening on what way the wind is blowing, we may be lucky enough to
>get the race on ITV or 5 Live this afternoon to go with Swedish
>pictures. Between 12pm and 3pm reception from the UK is awful!
What lousy timing! It's a plot. Let's blame Ron Dennis. :o)
--
([:]) by Kimbo!
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? I am not a moderator.
note: hotmail address is a spam bin
www .bykimbo,com