Re: Max in a spot of botherDuncan Snowden <dss@ukonline.co.uk> wrote:
> Alan LeHun wrote:
>
> > In article <-OadnQfDN9aeGm3anZ2dnUVZ8radnZ2d@pipex,net >, nospam@f2s,com
> > says...
> >> On second thoughts - and as the News of the Screws video won't play
> >> using Firefox - can this be true? Really? Anyone?
> >>
> >
> > Well Max is fighting it on grounds of "invasion of privacy" so yes,
> > looks like it.
>
> Frankly, what Mosely - or anyone else, for that matter - gets up to in
> his private life is his business and nobody else's, and he's probably
> got the "Screws" bang to rights on that count. From the paper's
> description of events, although IANAL, it sounds like entrapment to me;
> rather different to setting up camp outside his house and waiting for a
> juicy snap. It's also worth noting (as Pitpass does) that it's part of
> News Corp., one of whose other papers, The Times, is engaged in legal
> shenanigans with the FIA already.
>
> But as I suggested in my OP, it'll be pretty hard for him to take the
> moral high ground with team owners and "certified half-wit"s from now
> on. People in glass houses, Max, old boy...
5 hours of video doesn't sound like entrapment to mre - it sounds like
hubris.
--
Rehab is for Quitters