Re: Bernie admits talks with Donington ParkPaul Ian Harman wrote:
> "Stephen M Baines" <usenet@localhost.kitschcamppalace.org.uk> wrote in
> message news:67c6j5-nvt.ln1@ascari.gasny.homeip,net ...
>> If they are going to put the money in, which it seems they are, why not?
>> Silverstone was just a converted airfield. Why not a 1st class facility at
>> Donington? It's not reliant on just Tom Wheatcroft's money any more. And
>> it needs the work to make sure it keeps the motoGP etc, too.
>
>
> It's got to be less money to get Silverstone up to scratch than pretty much
> any other facility, and that way we only need to Tilkefy one UK race track.
But Donington now has a far richer owner than Silverstone has, plus they
haven't spent the last few years whining and whining to Bernie and
generally winding him up.
> If not Silverstone, then plough the money into Brands, which has to be the
> next closest (the money would mostly need using telling the new housing
> estate to stop whining).
Which is why it won't happen. Brands lost it's chances when Nicola
Foulston sold the family jewels to property developers and beefed up
anti-terror rules make radio a major issue.
--
Stephen M Baines
http :// www .kitschcamppalace.org.uk
http :// www .alledal.nu