Re: Scott Kalitta Fatal Crash Videochuck_steak@nospam,com (Chuck Steak) wrote in
news:ykO8k.93$8c.89@trndny05:
> In article jimmygator@gmail,com wrote:
>
>>I was trying to bring out that even though the pointy cars are much
>>faster at every venue they compete at than ever before, even more so
>>that cup cars have increased in speeds for the most part, I've never
>>heard anyone mention the increase in speeds of the pointy cars have
>>made the tracks they compete at obsolete.
>
> Because they haven't..
> If you say "we have to slow these cars down
> by taking away a few hundred HP" at a track,
> then the cars have outgrown the track.
> So far... they have not done that with the IRL cars.
> (IIRC)
Agreed with respect to the IRL cars (which, incidently, are quite
a bit slower at Indy than they used to be). These are relatively
light cars with lots of downforce, racing mostly on fairly flat
tracks. They have a ways to go yet before they overcome the
tracks (possibly excepting Texas, where the g-forces are an issue
for the drivers).
But if you look at other forms of motorsport, it's been common in
recent times to make substantial changes, or even abandon a course,
because the cars have become too fast for it. Chicanes were added
to the Mulsanne when the Le Mans cars started exceeding 250mph,
and the hump was removed after the Mercedes cars started doing
backflips. Imola was reconfigured after Senna's death, and has
since been removed from the F1 circuit. Spa likewise was removed,
altho it's been rebuilt and is, I think, back this year.
John