Re: RIP Scott KalittaDAVe <smalleyster@gmail,com > wrote in
news:7fa90d04-8a8e-4bfe-b8e5-742fec3f9e0e@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups,com :
> After thinking about it a bit I see two issues and if the pole is true
> then there are three.
>
> 1) It seemed that the parachute disintegrated from the fire. Maybe
> they need to consider fireproof cutes and lines.
Yes, it appeared the chute was deployed but failed to open. It
would seem to make sense to figure out why, and do something to
try & ensure that a deployed chute always opens.
> 2) There should have been a containment system strong enough to stop a
> funny car at 350 mph yet not kill the driver. Nets, hedges, series of
> styro-foam and / or water walls...
An interesting challenge. I don't think anything that gets impacted
(e.g. an oval track style SAFER barrier) would work - either it
would disintegrate or it would be so stiff the car disintegrated.
And sand/gravel traps don't really work at those speeds - the car
tends to just fly over them.
Maybe something like a net anchored with cables similar to the
arrestor cables on an aircraft carrier.
> 3) If he hit the pole then the track and designers are completely at
> fault as he traveled in nearly a straight line and there should have
> been no way to hit it.
It's not clear from the video I saw how straight the car was
going. I'm going to assume the designers wouldn't put the pole
right in the middle of the net, so it must have been off to the
side to some degree. I can't fault them too much for not forseeing
how far off to the side it needed to be.
Something else which needs to be considered is, Kalitta may not
have survived the engine explosion, which makes the placement of
the pole/wall somewhat moot. I'm sure the NHRA will be looking
at what can be done to prevent/contain such things (like they
did a few years back with the blankets & straps over the blower),
but I'm not sure I see a real solution there other than the one
Don Garlits adopted 40 odd years ago, which isn't really practical
in the funny cars.
John