Testing access to rec.travel

Testing access to rec.travel

Havent received any messages since 1/6/08
John H

Re: Testing access to rec.travel


"John H" <johnH4999@hotmail,com > wrote in message
news:484b9316$1@news,com indico,com .au...
> Havent received any messages since 1/6/08
> John H
Perhaps your spam blocker has been working effectively, because you haven't
missed much since then!

Regards

David Bennetts

Re: Testing access to rec.travel

There have been 45 posts since May 10th. Most of them
were drivel.

Check with your ISP or start using spam-friendly Google.

Dick

Re: Testing access to rec.travel

On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 08:39:15 +1000, "David Bennetts" <davibenne-nospam@yahoo,com .au> wrote:

>
>"John H" <johnH4999@hotmail,com > wrote in message
>news:484b9316$1@news,com indico,com .au...
>> Havent received any messages since 1/6/08
>> John H
>Perhaps your spam blocker has been working effectively, because you haven't
>missed much since then!
>
>Regards
>
>David Bennetts
>
Could depend on how his ISP access newsgroups.
Some are now dropping Usenet due to the huge amount of crap/spam from Google.

Cath

Re: Testing access to rec.travel

I dont see any either..I do have KANGAROO16 " BLOCKED "

> Havent received any messages since 1/6/08
> John H

Re: Testing access to rec.travel




On 6/8/08 9:56 PM, in article MJ23k.17702$gc5.10199@pd7urf2no, "Rudy"
<NoSpam@no-onehome,net > wrote:

> I dont see any either..I do have KANGAROO16 " BLOCKED "
>
>> Havent received any messages since 1/6/08
>> John H
>
>
He hasn't posted in ages. It seems he drove nearly everyone away and then
left. I hope this isn't a jinx that will bring him back since you mentioned
him and I replied!

--
Martha Canada

Re: Testing access to rec.travel

On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 05:16:39 GMT, MI <quilchenapark@shaw.ca> wrote:

>
>
>
>On 6/8/08 9:56 PM, in article MJ23k.17702$gc5.10199@pd7urf2no, "Rudy"
><NoSpam@no-onehome,net > wrote:
>
>> I dont see any either..I do have KANGAROO16 " BLOCKED "
>>
>>> Havent received any messages since 1/6/08
>>> John H
>>
>>
>He hasn't posted in ages. It seems he drove nearly everyone away and then
>left. I hope this isn't a jinx that will bring him back since you mentioned
>him and I replied!

His is typical behaviour of some posters.
They normally don't last long.

Cath

Re: Testing access to rec.travel

On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 00:35:07 -0500,
texan....usenet@texas...removethisbit.usacom.. wrote:

>On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 05:16:39 GMT, MI <quilchenapark@shaw.ca> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>On 6/8/08 9:56 PM, in article MJ23k.17702$gc5.10199@pd7urf2no, "Rudy"
>><NoSpam@no-onehome,net > wrote:
>>
>>> I dont see any either..I do have KANGAROO16 " BLOCKED "
>>>
>>>> Havent received any messages since 1/6/08
>>>> John H
>>>
>>>
>>He hasn't posted in ages. It seems he drove nearly everyone away and then
>>left. I hope this isn't a jinx that will bring him back since you mentioned
>>him and I replied!
>
>His is typical behaviour of some posters.
>They normally don't last long.
>
>Cath

In among his L-O-N-G posts there was usually something of interest to
the thinking person, perhaps not for you.

Re: Testing access to rec.travel

<tony@altavista,com > wrote:

> In among his L-O-N-G posts there was usually something
> of interest to the thinking person, perhaps not for you.

You are correct. Even nitwits have coherent thoughts.

Dick

Re: Testing access to rec.travel

Maybe, but he had verbal Diahorea, couldnt help himself and mostly drifted
off topic during message anyway.
John H
<tony@altavista,com > wrote in message
news:4ufs44ptdcjksa0441mcq8hci05piic03n@4ax,com ...
> On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 00:35:07 -0500,
> texan....usenet@texas...removethisbit.usacom.. wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 05:16:39 GMT, MI <quilchenapark@shaw.ca> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On 6/8/08 9:56 PM, in article MJ23k.17702$gc5.10199@pd7urf2no, "Rudy"
>>><NoSpam@no-onehome,net > wrote:
>>>
>>>> I dont see any either..I do have KANGAROO16 " BLOCKED "
>>>>
>>>>> Havent received any messages since 1/6/08
>>>>> John H
>>>>
>>>>
>>>He hasn't posted in ages. It seems he drove nearly everyone away and then
>>>left. I hope this isn't a jinx that will bring him back since you
>>>mentioned
>>>him and I replied!
>>
>>His is typical behaviour of some posters.
>>They normally don't last long.
>>
>>Cath
>
> In among his L-O-N-G posts there was usually something of interest to
> the thinking person, perhaps not for you.