Re: PING: Janet Baraclough
"Ophelia" <Ophelia@nix.co.uk> wrote in message
news:g068c2$c9r$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> Hey sf, don't worry. There are some people around like that. It really
> doesn't matter to me one fig:)
>
> I notice that it has been edited not to show to whom I am responding and
> why!
>
>
> Usenet has toughened me up considerably! I don't allow anyone to upset me
> now. Personally, I don't care. it means nothing to me:)
>
>
> Life is good, be happy:))
>
Good attitude, ROphelia......I think SF has hit on the right cord there with
her comment Love!.... :-)
Bigbazza (Barry) Oz
> sf wrote:
>> My, my Anne.... you're quite the little shit disturber, aren't you?
>> Let sleeping dogs lie! Janet and Ophelia coexist in peace here.
>>
>> `````````````````````
>>
>> On Sun, 11 May 2008 00:56:23 +0000 (UTC), "Anne"
>> <cruchiaw@guerrillamail . com > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Ophelia's just posted the following in the uk.media.tv.misc
>>> newsgroup. Are you the "Jan" she's referring to?
>>>
>>>
>>>> Let us call her Jan. She tries to cause rows in all sorts of places.
>>>> I have bested her on more than one occasion and she doesn't like it.
>>>> I can't work out if she is jealous or afraid of me.
>>>>
>>>> But she does have fat legs:))))) She sometimes attacks me using
>>>> her real name, but when it goes too far she uses an anonymous nick.
>>>> She has her posts <no archived> and she thinks no one can trace
>>>> back her history.... WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>
>>>> She is a figure of fun and she can't upset me:)))
>
>
>