Re: Top 10 Health Benefits of TeaOn Jul 10, 10:56 am, surfmaster...@gmail,com wrote:
> On Jul 10, 9:58 am, "Dominic T." <dominictibe...@gmail,com > wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 10, 7:53 am, surfmaster...@gmail,com wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 8, 8:56 am, "Dominic T." <dominictibe...@gmail,com > wrote:
>
> > > > On Jul 7, 3:37 pm, Lewis Perin <pe...@panix,com > wrote:
>
> > > > > Dennis <dpan...@gmail,com > writes:
> > > > > > [...identical post #4...]
>
> > > > > If you're going to (cross-)post here at all, you seem to be unable to
> > > > > avoid repetition. But maybe you can just not post here at all?
>
> > > > > /Lew
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Lew Perin / pe...@acm.org http :// www .panix,com /~perin/babelcarp.html
>
> > > > Seconded. Dennis, your posts are not useful nor relevant so please
> > > > just stop posting here.
>
> > > > - Dominic
>
> > > Dominic:
>
> > > I respectfully disagree. While the repetition is annoying, the
> > > information is indeed relevant, it is about tea no? And is this group
> > > not about sharing information about tea? I for one appreciate the
> > > information being posted here and would like to continue to see it
> > > posted (if you can just avoid the repetition Dennis...)
>
> > > Cheers
> > > Mike
> > > Owner, TeaFrog,com
>
> > Well, you are entitled to your opinion but seeing as how you also are
> > not a regular contributor here it doesn't mean much to me personally.
> > The information Dennis posted was not his own, it is simply an
> > aggregate of most of the folks' here (myself included) posts. Feel
> > free to read any/all of our individual blogs to glean the same
> > information from the real sources.
>
> > If Dennis or yourself would like to contribute real information,
> > discussion, or insight then that is most welcome.
>
> > - Dominic
>
> Fair enough Dominic, I personally do not give your opinion much weight
> either because I do not know you or your motivation either, so I guess
> we are equal in that regard. If this group is not for sharing
> information, then I guess I missed the point somewhere. Why not share
> a blog posting? Why not share some information that someone found
> useful for themselves? Perhaps in this one instance it was not
> targeted to yourself, who is apparently much more knowledgeable about
> tea than others on the list? Try to keep in mind that not everyone
> reading this list, be it on Usenet or other, is as educated as
> yourself about tea, and they perhaps appreciate that the information
> was shared? I for one am appreciative of the original post (the
> first, not the subsequent re-postings), no matter the intention of the
> poster.
>
> Just an opinion, no more or less valid than yours either.
>
> Cheers
> Mike
> Owner, TeaFrog,com
Look I'm in no mood or inclination to argue with you. If you don't
value me or my opinions then that is fine with me. I never assume
anyone is at any specific "level" and myself and many others here have
posted our blog URLs which are very easy to find with a simple search
of the word "blog."
Again, it never ceases to amaze me that somehow someone who lurks or
rarely/ever contributes is quick to judge or spout off when someone
who HAS invested a large amount of time and effort shows well-founded
displeasure with something going on here. It doesn't make my opinion
worth any more or less, what it shows is that I have a much more
vested interest in keeping things as they are with a good signal to
noise ratio... I obviously have a real reason behind what I am saying
or I wouldn't waste my time or effort. You may not understand or
realize the implications and impact of allowing such things as Dennis'
post but I do.
Posts like this just flood the group, and are made without any desire
to then come back in and discuss anything... BECAUSE THE OP DIDN'T
WRITE IT AND HAS NO ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE. So you just get a bunch of
garbage posts and dead end discussions. If someone wants to post some
original thoughts/info/insight/whatever, fine, but to just blast a big
list of aggregate posts serves no one even if you think it does.
- Dominic