Re: Interesting new High-end Digital SystemOn Sun, 4 Nov 2007 19:24:32 -0800, Codifus wrote
(in article <fgm2dg01o1e@news3.newsguy,com >):
> Sonnova wrote:
>> On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 07:39:29 -0800, wrct@club.cc.cmu.edu wrote
>> (in article <fgkp3h04du@news3.newsguy,com >):
>>
>>
>>> "Seems it stores the music files in memory, not hard discs."
>>>
>>> There are just now starting to appear drop in flash memory "disks" for
>>> conventional hard drives. Very expensive but as always the price is
>>> dropping and can be projected to be the storage device of the near
>>> future.
>>>
>>> Ipod type plug in devices are a form of this even now.
>>
>>
>> There is no doubt that solid-state storage is the wave of the future and
>> says
>> are numbered for all mechanical storage media, hard-drives, CD players, DVD
>> players, you name it. It's just a matter of the memory getting cheap enough
>> and reliable enough to be archival.
> Mechanical storage media will always be around because it's cheaper. Not
> all computational scenarios require dead silent access with near zero
> access times. The portable hard drives in MP3 players are a perfect
> example. They are pretty much silent with acess times good enough to
> transfer digital audio.
That's a bit of a flaw in your logic. You are saying that mechanical storage
media will always be with us in the FUTURE because it's cheaper TODAY. That's
like a 19th century pundit saying that gas light would always be the
artificial light of the masses because at that time, the gas service was
already in place and was cheaper than electricity.
> I own an iPod nano, a flash based mp3 player, and as great as it is, I
> don't see hard drive based players going away because they'll always be
> cheaper and offer much more capacity.
How do you know that?
> Technology will adapt. The new
> range of Ipods boast gapless playing. That's for both the flash and hard
> drive based players. That feature alone makes them a worthwhile upgrade.
Granted that at this moment the cost/megabyte favors HDD, but I don't see how
you can possibly assume that this will always be the case. There are sound
reasons for eliminating moving parts in storage media. First is cost. A
socket is always going to be cheaper than a motorized mechanism. Second is
reliability - especially in portable devices, but also in stationary devices.
Drop your HDD-based iPod on the concrete and there's a good possibility that
the HDD will be damaged. Everyone knows that even on desktop computer that
are never moved, that hard-disk drives have a finite life, that's why we are
encouraged to back them up. Also solid-state memories use less power, are
smaller and lighter. Everything points to solid-state memory devices being
preferred over HDD. Its simply a matter of time.
>
> CD