Re: New to group with ? Tandberg tunerOn Fri, 23 Nov 2007 10:27:01 -0800, Peter Wieck wrote
(in article <feidna_iB7_ohtranZ2dnUVZWhednZ2d@pghconnect,com >):
> On Nov 21, 12:07 am, twilightzonepinball <tomwi...@aol,com > wrote:
>> Hello, I am new to this group and was wondering of anyone could help
>> guide me through an upgrade to an old system. In the 80's I assembled
>> a modest system with a Tandberg 3001 tuner, Revox CD player, Bryston
>> 2B sub amp, Amber 70 series main amp, Energy 22pro speakers, Dahlquist
>> DQ-LP1 Cross, DQ W1 sub, and NAD preamp. Over the years as things
>> broke I replaced the Revox with a Pioneer Elite DVD, the NAD with AVA
>> EC SS preamp, and now since the Tandberg is problematic and doesn't
>> tune well it is going out soon.
>> Any thoughts on what tuner to get? I think reception is my top
>> priority and fidelity soon after that. Not sure I want to spend $$$$,
>> so anything in the sub $500 zone noteworthy these days? Yes I know
>> about the Fanfare stuff, just not sure i want to spend the $$$$.
>>
>> Thanks a ton,
>>
>> -Tom
>
> Tom:
>
> With respect to all the high-end tuners out there, before I invested
> anything more than a couple-of-hundred-bucks on anything other than a
> moderate used tuner, I would invest in a very good directional FM-
> tuned antenna - that is, if you can do that at your location. A good
> antenna will give you far more useful reception on a tuner as crude as
> the Dynaco FM3 than an Accuphase will give you with a dipole and in a
> bad location.
>
> Personally, the best tuner I have is a Revox A720, that with a modest
> Terk antenna is flat-out amazing. That beast set me well under $300 to
> purchase and an additional $150 to have cleaned and aligned. It is not
> a half-bad pre-amp either and with the nixie-tube display is a real
> eye-catcher - if that is also a goal.
>
> http :// www .reeltoreel.de/worldwide/A720.htm
>
> But there are many decent tuners out there in the used/vintage market
> that should do you very well at a moderate cost. Accuphase is a start.
> Any of several from Revox, Pioneer, even Hafler. Some even with remote
> capacity. Keep in mind that after a certain point, the tuner is better
> than the signal it is receiving - and that point ain't nohow so very
> hard to reach. Also keep in mind that "legendary" tuners (such as the
> Marantz 10B as an example) are no better than a $100 HK Citation tuner
> in most real-world applications. Scopes, dials, knobs and meters are
> generally inaudible.
>
> Have fun in your search. Make sure you have a try-before-you-buy
> option while testing.
>
> Peter Wieck
> Wyncote, PA
RF- wise, almost any decent modern tuner such as a DynaLab or a Yamaha T-85
is better than a Marantz 10B or even an HH Scott 4310. However, both of these
latter "classic" tube tuners sound better than most modern tuners under the
correct circumstances.