OT:NYT President Opostate

First Hillary appeals to her working class white base and now the
NYT's busts out with this beauty.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/12/opinion/12luttwak.html?_r=1&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin

or

http://tinyurl.com/5ldyq6

What has happenned to the libs lately?
Same 'ol anything for the cause.

ScottW

On May 12, 4:53 pm, ScottW <Scott...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> First Hillary appeals to her working class white base and now the
> NYT's busts out with this beauty.
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/12/opinion/12luttwak.html?_r=1&partner...=

>
> or
>
> http://tinyurl.com/5ldyq6
>
> What has happenned to the libs lately?

Why, they've been winning elections, 2pid. What has happened to the
conservatives? ;-)

Why would you, aside from stupidity, assume that liberals have
anything to do with this article? LOL!

> Same 'ol anything for the cause.

Shouldn't that be, "Sme 'ol antng f t cse"? Time's a wasting!

I'm still waiting for your scenario II, the 'brilliant' follow-up to
your Taiwan scenario, as well as for your detailed comparison of
McCain's plans to Obama's.

LOL!

On May 12, 4:28 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
<artygu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On May 12, 4:53 pm, ScottW <Scott...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I'm still waiting for your scenario II, the 'brilliant' follow-up to
> your Taiwan scenario,

Why? You think you can redeem yourself?
Here's a hint, you can't.

> as well as for your detailed comparison of
> McCain's plans to Obama's.

Impossible, Obama has no details.

ScottW

On May 12, 6:38 pm, ScottW <Scott...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On May 12, 4:28 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> <artygu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On May 12, 4:53 pm, ScottW <Scott...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm still waiting for your scenario II, the 'brilliant' follow-up to
> > your Taiwan scenario,
>
>  Why?  You think you can redeem yourself?

Reddem myself? I'm looking for valid reasons that we needed to spend
$200 billion to develop and field 200 of one aircraft type. You
offered on far-fetched scenario. As I said, let's for the moment
assume that your scenario is valid.

What other cold-war scenarios can you offer? Is "trying to avert a
military solution" worth $200 billion for one type of aircraft,
fielded in small numbers?

As I thought: you have nothing.

>  Here's a hint, you can't.

I'm with you, 2pid: one simulation (put on by people with a vested
interest in the outcome) that showed a Mig-29 possibly out-manuevering
an F-15 in one area justifies the expenditure and renders the F-15
obsolete. LOL!

> >  as well as for your detailed comparison of
> > McCain's plans to Obama's.
>
>  Impossible, Obama has no details.

http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/issues/4dbd2cc7-890e-47f1-882f-b8fc4cfec=
c78.htm

http://www.barackobama.com/issues/

They appear very similar in the amount of detail to me.

On 12 Mai, 19:38, ScottW <Scott...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On May 12, 4:28 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"


>
> >  as well as for your detailed comparison of
> > McCain's plans to Obama's.
>
>  Impossible, Obama has no details.
>


That's the beauty of it.
The anti-Hillary

I find the libs more honest than the conservatives, who deny reality by
denying the biocentric basis for most differential human behavior. Libs
know it and that's why they campaign for standards undercutting, racial
enturbulation, statistical regimentation (a/k/a "affirmative action")and
all other lib-nostrums. Conservatives REALLY BELIEVE their own horseshit
in most cases. Few libs do.

--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/
More information at http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/faq.html