Re: Question for Art SackmanOn May 20, 10:33=EF=BF=BDam, ScottW <Scott...@hotmail,com > wrote:
> On May 19, 7:18=EF=BF=BDpm, Clyde Slick <Mr.clydesl...@yahoo,com > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 19 Mai, 14:42, ScottW <Scott...@hotmail,com > wrote:
>
> > > On May 19, 11:37=EF=BF=BDam, "Soundhaspriority" <nowh...@nowhere,com > =
wrote:
>
> > > > In the phone conversation with The Devil, he told me that his audio
> > > > preferences were very similar to yours. What preferences would they =
be?
>
> > > =EF=BF=BDArt doesn't go gaga over Quads.
>
> > > ScottW
>
> > There are things I like about Quads
> > There are two things I don't like about them
> > difficulty of matching subs to get some bass
> > and there is just no beat to them.
> > Bad for rock music and blues.
>
> =EF=BF=BDAfter listening to Orions I realize how congested the Quads
> get on classical and while female vocals can have a mesmerizing
> texture as well as acoustic strings, they lack the subtleties
> of realism. =EF=BF=BD And while you hear much with Quads, you rarely feel
> anything. =EF=BF=BDThey're great speakers for not disturbing the neighbors=
> but do need room to soundstage. =EF=BF=BDI'll always love them, but
> they don't play a piano.
That's why I lean more toward speakers like Harbeth these days. Lots
of feeling.
Boon