Look out Jenn

In article
<9700f51b-b977-4b7c-a590-c5b4a45172a3@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups . com >,
Clyde Slick <Mr.clydeslick@yahoo . com > wrote:

> On 15 Mai, 17:06, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
> > In article
>
>
> Scott:
> > > Anyway, you're stupid comments aside it does not require
> > > and human emotion to replicate music, only to create.
> >
> > lol-
>
> ACCURACY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How so?

On 15 Mai, 20:08, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
> In article
> <9700f51b-b977-4b7c-a590-c5b4a4517...@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups . com >,
>  Clyde Slick <Mr.clydesl...@yahoo . com > wrote:
>
> > On 15 Mai, 17:06, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
> > > In article
>
> > Scott:
> > > > Anyway, you're stupid comments aside it does not require
> > > > and human emotion to replicate music, only to create.
>
> > > lol-
>
> > ACCURACY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> How so?

Simple!!!!

Build a machine to input the orchestra sound
and convert it to output in formn of a score, then compare that score
to the original.
We can call the machine a RHC, a robot to human converter.
I'm gonna feel very, very guilty if someone actually tries this.
LOL!!!!

On May 15, 10:44 pm, Clyde Slick <Mr.clydesl...@yahoo . com > wrote:
> On 15 Mai, 20:08, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > <9700f51b-b977-4b7c-a590-c5b4a4517...@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups . com >,
> >  Clyde Slick <Mr.clydesl...@yahoo . com > wrote:
>
> > > On 15 Mai, 17:06, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
> > > > In article
>
> > > Scott:
> > > > > Anyway, you're stupid comments aside it does not require
> > > > > and human emotion to replicate music, only to create.
>
> > > > lol-
>
> > > ACCURACY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> > How so?
>
> Simple!!!!
>
> Build a machine to input the orchestra sound
> and convert it to output in formn  of a score, then compare that score
> to the original.
> We can call the machine a RHC, a robot to human converter.
> I'm gonna feel very, very guilty if someone actually tries this.
> LOL!!!!

GOIA has tried something similar to this. His "trumpets" sound like
"kazoos" though.

On 15 Mai, 20:08, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
> In article
> <9700f51b-b977-4b7c-a590-c5b4a4517...@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups . com >,
>  Clyde Slick <Mr.clydesl...@yahoo . com > wrote:
>
> > On 15 Mai, 17:06, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
> > > In article
>
> > Scott:
> > > > Anyway, you're stupid comments aside it does not require
> > > > and human emotion to replicate music, only to create.
>
> > > lol-
>
> > ACCURACY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> How so?



Thick as a brick

On May 15, 4:06 pm, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
> In article
> <baf40b03-046d-42a5-8bd0-d4723ad09...@b9g2000prh.googlegroups . com >,
>
>
>
>
>
>  ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> > On May 15, 9:50 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> > <artygu...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> > > On May 15, 11:35 am, ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
>
> > > > On May 15, 12:06 am, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
>
> > > > > In article
> > > > > <80397619-fee5-4da4-81fd-79b74627b...@w4g2000prd.googlegroups . com >=
,
>
> > > > >  ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> > > > > > A replacement is in development.
>
> > > > > > * news.yahoo . com /s/ap/20080514/ap_en_mu/robot_conductor1st_l=
d_wr..
> > > > > >.
>
> > > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > > Nah, he has no legato...
>
> > > >  Simple subroutine.   This is just a matter of time.
>
> > > You and GOIA should hook up. You apparently both belief that music
> > > requires no human interface and no emotion... LOL!
>
> > Human interface, like a GUI?
> > Anyway, you're stupid comments aside it does not require
> > and human emotion to replicate music, only to create.
>
> lol

;-)

In article
<9bdebaa0-b82d-49ea-81f2-e87c20faa325@v26g2000prm.googlegroups . com >,
ScottW <ScottW48@hotmail . com > wrote:

> On May 15, 12:06 am, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
> > In article
> > <80397619-fee5-4da4-81fd-79b74627b...@w4g2000prd.googlegroups . com >,
> >
> >  ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> > > A replacement is in development.
> >
> > > * news.yahoo . com /s/ap/20080514/ap_en_mu/robot_conductor1st_ld_wr...
> >
> > > ScottW
> >
> > Nah, he has no legato...
>
> Simple subroutine. This is just a matter of time.

Well, enjoy that music.

On May 15, 2:05 pm, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
> In article
> <9bdebaa0-b82d-49ea-81f2-e87c20faa...@v26g2000prm.googlegroups . com >,
>
>  ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> > On May 15, 12:06 am, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <80397619-fee5-4da4-81fd-79b74627b...@w4g2000prd.googlegroups . com >,
>
> > >  ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> > > > A replacement is in development.
>
> > > > * news.yahoo . com /s/ap/20080514/ap_en_mu/robot_conductor1st_ld_wr=
...
>
> > > > ScottW
>
> > > Nah, he has no legato...
>
> >  Simple subroutine.   This is just a matter of time.
>
> Well, enjoy that music.

Millions do every day.
So who is the greatest conductor ever who is passed?
If there was a video of his greatest performance, would you be opposed
to a robot mimicking that performance leading a fine orchestra?

ScottW

On May 15, 8:59 pm, ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> On May 15, 2:05 pm, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > <9bdebaa0-b82d-49ea-81f2-e87c20faa...@v26g2000prm.googlegroups . com >,
>
> >  ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> > > On May 15, 12:06 am, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > <80397619-fee5-4da4-81fd-79b74627b...@w4g2000prd.googlegroups . com >,
>
> > > >  ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> > > > > A replacement is in development.
>
> > > > > * news.yahoo . com /s/ap/20080514/ap_en_mu/robot_conductor1st_ld_=
wr...
>
> > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > Nah, he has no legato...
>
> > >  Simple subroutine.   This is just a matter of time.
>
> > Well, enjoy that music.
>
> Millions do every day.
> So who is the greatest conductor ever who is passed?
> If there was a video of his greatest performance, would you be opposed
> to a robot mimicking that performance leading a fine orchestra?

There is more to conducting than the performance. The rehearsals play
into it as well. I recall hearing an LP that had the conductor
(Walter? Furtwangler?) leading the orchestra during a rehearsal and
explaining how he wanted it done. Jenn can surely talk about this with
more expertise than I can, but to think that an orchestra performance
could be replicated by a robot is purely imbecilic.

Next up from 2pid: how robots can produce great works of literature.

Lol LoL lOl LOL!

On 15 Mai, 22:07, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
<artygu...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> On May 15, 8:59=A0pm, ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 15, 2:05=A0pm, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
>
> > > In article
> > > <9bdebaa0-b82d-49ea-81f2-e87c20faa...@v26g2000prm.googlegroups . com >,
>
> > > =A0ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> > > > On May 15, 12:06=A0am, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
> > > > > In article
> > > > > <80397619-fee5-4da4-81fd-79b74627b...@w4g2000prd.googlegroups . com >=
,
>
> > > > > =A0ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> > > > > > A replacement is in development.
>
> > > > > > * news.yahoo . com /s/ap/20080514/ap_en_mu/robot_conductor1st_l=
d_wr...
>
> > > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > > Nah, he has no legato...
>
> > > > =A0Simple subroutine. =A0 This is just a matter of time.
>
> > > Well, enjoy that music.
>
> > Millions do every day.
> > So who is the greatest conductor ever who is passed?
> > If there was a video of his greatest performance, would you be opposed
> > to a robot mimicking that performance leading a fine orchestra?
>
> There is more to conducting than the performance. The rehearsals play
> into it as well. I recall hearing an LP that had the conductor
> (Walter? Furtwangler?) leading the orchestra during a rehearsal and
> explaining how he wanted it done. Jenn can surely talk about this with
> more expertise than I can, but to think that an orchestra performance
> could be replicated by a robot is purely imbecilic.
>
> Next up from 2pid: how robots can produce great works of literature.
>
> Lol LoL lOl LOL!- Ascunde citatul -
>
> - Afi=BAare text =EEn citat -

We cn always elect a robot president, given that
the robot is at least 35 years old and manufactured in the U.S.

On May 15, 10:40 pm, Clyde Slick <Mr.clydesl...@yahoo . com > wrote:
> On 15 Mai, 22:07, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> <artygu...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> > On May 15, 8:59 pm, ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
>
> > > On May 15, 2:05 pm, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
>
> > > > In article
> > > > <9bdebaa0-b82d-49ea-81f2-e87c20faa...@v26g2000prm.googlegroups . com >,=

>
> > > >  ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> > > > > On May 15, 12:06 am, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote=
:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > <80397619-fee5-4da4-81fd-79b74627b...@w4g2000prd.googlegroups.co=
m>,
>
> > > > > >  ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> > > > > > > A replacement is in development.
>
> > > > > > > * news.yahoo . com /s/ap/20080514/ap_en_mu/robot_conductor1st=
_ld_wr...
>
> > > > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > > > Nah, he has no legato...
>
> > > > >  Simple subroutine.   This is just a matter of time.
>
> > > > Well, enjoy that music.
>
> > > Millions do every day.
> > > So who is the greatest conductor ever who is passed?
> > > If there was a video of his greatest performance, would you be opposed=

> > > to a robot mimicking that performance leading a fine orchestra?
>
> > There is more to conducting than the performance. The rehearsals play
> > into it as well. I recall hearing an LP that had the conductor
> > (Walter? Furtwangler?) leading the orchestra during a rehearsal and
> > explaining how he wanted it done. Jenn can surely talk about this with
> > more expertise than I can, but to think that an orchestra performance
> > could be replicated by a robot is purely imbecilic.
>
> > Next up from 2pid: how robots can produce great works of literature.
>
> > Lol LoL lOl LOL!

> We cn always elect a robot president, given that
> the robot is at least 35 years old and manufactured in the U.S.

LOL!

On May 15, 7:07 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
<artygu...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> On May 15, 8:59 pm, ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 15, 2:05 pm, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
>
> > > In article
> > > <9bdebaa0-b82d-49ea-81f2-e87c20faa...@v26g2000prm.googlegroups . com >,
>
> > >  ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> > > > On May 15, 12:06 am, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
> > > > > In article
> > > > > <80397619-fee5-4da4-81fd-79b74627b...@w4g2000prd.googlegroups . com >=
,
>
> > > > >  ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> > > > > > A replacement is in development.
>
> > > > > > * news.yahoo . com /s/ap/20080514/ap_en_mu/robot_conductor1st_l=
d_wr...
>
> > > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > > Nah, he has no legato...
>
> > > >  Simple subroutine.   This is just a matter of time.
>
> > > Well, enjoy that music.
>
> > Millions do every day.
> > So who is the greatest conductor ever who is passed?
> > If there was a video of his greatest performance, would you be opposed
> > to a robot mimicking that performance leading a fine orchestra?
>
> There is more to conducting than the performance. The rehearsals play
> into it as well. I recall hearing an LP that had the conductor
> (Walter? Furtwangler?) leading the orchestra during a rehearsal and
> explaining how he wanted it done. Jenn can surely talk about this with
> more expertise than I can, but to think that an orchestra performance
> could be replicated by a robot is purely imbecilic.
>
> Next up from 2pid: how robots can produce great works of literature.

That would be reproduce, once again your inability to comprehend the
topic is limited. Robotic reproduction of literature happens every
day.

ScottW

On May 16, 10:03 am, ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> On May 15, 7:07 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

> > Next up from 2pid: how robots can produce great works of literature.
>
>   That would be reproduce, once again your inability to comprehend the
> topic is limited. Robotic reproduction of literature happens every
> day.

Is that all conductors do? I'll compromise with you, 2pid.

Next up from 2pid: how robots can interpret great works of literature.

Showing, once again, your inability to think.

On 15 Mai, 21:59, ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> On May 15, 2:05 pm, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > <9bdebaa0-b82d-49ea-81f2-e87c20faa...@v26g2000prm.googlegroups . com >,
>
> >  ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> > > On May 15, 12:06 am, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > <80397619-fee5-4da4-81fd-79b74627b...@w4g2000prd.googlegroups . com >,
>
> > > >  ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> > > > > A replacement is in development.
>
> > > > > * news.yahoo . com /s/ap/20080514/ap_en_mu/robot_conductor1st_ld_=
wr...
>
> > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > Nah, he has no legato...
>
> > >  Simple subroutine.   This is just a matter of time.
>
> > Well, enjoy that music.
>
> Millions do every day.
> So who is the greatest conductor ever who is passed?
> If there was a video of his greatest performance, would you be opposed
> to a robot mimicking that performance leading a fine orchestra?
>
> ScottW-

"Mimic" is the operative word.

In article
<d3944363-370e-40e8-bb4b-9628e5ed7efa@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups . com >,
ScottW <ScottW48@hotmail . com > wrote:

> On May 15, 2:05 pm, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
> > In article
> > <9bdebaa0-b82d-49ea-81f2-e87c20faa...@v26g2000prm.googlegroups . com >,
> >
> >  ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> > > On May 15, 12:06 am, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > <80397619-fee5-4da4-81fd-79b74627b...@w4g2000prd.googlegroups . com >,
> >
> > > >  ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> > > > > A replacement is in development.
> >
> > > > > * news.yahoo . com /s/ap/20080514/ap_en_mu/robot_conductor1st_ld_wr..
> > > > >.
> >
> > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > Nah, he has no legato...
> >
> > >  Simple subroutine.   This is just a matter of time.
> >
> > Well, enjoy that music.
>
> Millions do every day.

How so?

> So who is the greatest conductor ever who is passed?

Matter of opinion. There's one of your problems.

> If there was a video of his greatest performance, would you be opposed
> to a robot mimicking that performance leading a fine orchestra?

I wouldn't be "opposed" but I guarantee that it wouldn't sound the same.

On May 15, 9:54 pm, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
> In article
> <d3944363-370e-40e8-bb4b-9628e5ed7...@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups . com >,
>
>
>
>
>
>  ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> > On May 15, 2:05 pm, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <9bdebaa0-b82d-49ea-81f2-e87c20faa...@v26g2000prm.googlegroups . com >,
>
> > >  ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> > > > On May 15, 12:06 am, Jenn <jennconductsREMOVET...@mac . com > wrote:
> > > > > In article
> > > > > <80397619-fee5-4da4-81fd-79b74627b...@w4g2000prd.googlegroups . com >=
,
>
> > > > >  ScottW <Scott...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> > > > > > A replacement is in development.
>
> > > > > > * news.yahoo . com /s/ap/20080514/ap_en_mu/robot_conductor1st_l=
d_wr..
> > > > > >.
>
> > > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > > Nah, he has no legato...
>
> > > >  Simple subroutine.   This is just a matter of time.
>
> > > Well, enjoy that music.
>
> > Millions do every day.
>
> How so?

How many drum tracks in pop music don't have a drummer
but a programmer?

>
> > So who is the greatest conductor ever who is passed?
>
> Matter of opinion.  There's one of your problems.

Not important, pick one, never mind we'll have the robot
mimic you.

>
> > If there was a video of his greatest performance, would you be opposed
> > to a robot mimicking that performance leading a fine orchestra?
>
> I wouldn't be "opposed" but I guarantee that it wouldn't sound the same.

Do any two performances, even by the same conductor, sound the same?

We're talking about replicating. Even a recording won't sound the same
as the original. But if one doesn't accept something short of
perfection and strive to improve, you'll never have anything.

ScottW