Re: Modify Marantz 1050 amp to suppress mains noiseOn 2008-01-28, Arny Krueger <arnyk@hotpop,com > wrote:
> "Toby Newman" <google@asktoby,com > wrote in message
> news:slrnfprddo.6kv.google@ID-171443.user.uni-berlin.de
>
>> I've run my home LAN over mains using DLink's DHP-301
>> PowerLine HD Network Starter Kit in a bid to reduce
>> wires. I was very happy with
>> the new system until I turned on my Marantz 1050
>> amplifier yesterday
>> and found that, being a piece of hardware from the 70s,
>> it's picking
>> up the noise of the LAN. Sounds like rapid switching
>> between a 6kHz and 7kHz square wave.
>
> There are other ways for noise to get into your system, besides the power
> line.
>
> It is quite possible taht a modern power amp or receiver would have the
> identically same problem.
>
>> I guess the Marantz
>> designers didn't anticipate anything but 50Hz hum on the
>> power supply and didn't see fit to filter for anything
>> more than that.
>
> Only a guess, and one that I would agree with the others - its a lower
> probability.
>
>> The first think I'll try is putting a surge protector
>> between the amp and the wall.
>
> Why? This isn't about surges, it is about EMI. Surges are defined as
> relatively long-term (i.e. milliseconds) increases in the voltage at the
> input to your amplifier. There's nothing inside your LAN that can produce
> surges that big. I'd bet that 5 volts is the largest voltage anyplace inside
> your LAN equipment, and in terms of a power line, that's a nit. The surges
> that a surge protector works against are dozens or hundreds or even
> thousands of volts.
The reason I will try a surge protector first is because consumer surge
protectors also often contain filtering, and are more readily available than
a mains filter. This will enable me to verify if the noise is borne on the mains
cable rather than carried through the air. If I see an attenuation I'll know that
the mains cable is the culprit.
>> The manufacturer says that these items must
>> not be used alongside the Powerline device because they
>> interfere with the network connection. I will try to use
>> this shortcoming to my favour. :)
>
> I suspect that they are worried that a surge protector would make additional
> interference.
>
>> If that fails, I'm planning to pop the case and add some
>> filtering inside, starting with the simple things like
>> ferrite rings and then moving up to adding capacitors or
>> a mains filter if that fails.
>
> First thing I'd do is swap in a new cheap ($80) receiver - borrowed from a
> friend or something. If it has the same problem, then look at the
> possibility of interference pick up by the signal cables or other gear in
> the system.
>
>> Links:
>> The Marantz 1050 (showing internals)
>> http :// www .classic-audio,com /marantz/1050.html
>
> The power transformer in equipment like this is a major barrier to power
> line noise. It's got great response at 50-60 Hz and lousy high frequency
> response.
That's interesting to know.
>> The LAN-over-mains equipment:
>> http :// www .dlink,com /products/?sec=1&pid=533
>
> Even the thought of this equipment is giving hams and other users of
> RF-based equipment heart attacks. But its not about surges, its about RFI
> and EMI.
>
> If you want to filter out what your LAN is pumping into the power line, get
> a power line filter, which may also have surge protection.
>
> Here's some examples:
>
> http :// www .e-sonic,com /aboutus/cat/S/surge%20suppressors.pdf
>
> anything that says it has effective line filtering built-in.
>
> The reason why everything on the page has surge protectors is that surge
> protection is cheap to add. Good line filtering can cost a little money.
--
-Toby
Add the word afiduluminag to the subject to circumvent my email filters.