Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
OT: revenge against Creative Technology
Reply from: -- messaggio eliminato --
Date: 09 May 2008, 23:06
-- deleted messages --
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
"Green Xenon [Radium]" wrote ...
> Okay, several things.
>
> People responding to me, said that my original post stated I wanted to
> kill people at Creative Technology. Feel free to quote when and where I
> said anything about wanting to kill anyone. I just wish for them to be
> punished -- not killed.
You are too emotionally unstable and seemingly incapable of
rational thought to be worthy of further discourse here IMHO.
> BTW, if Catherina didn't have anything good to tell me, then she should've
> just kept quiet and not answered me at all. When you ask a company about
> one of its products, you expects an answer about the product, not some
> nonsense about your question being removed because it was posted to
> different forums.
You expectations of a mass-market company like Creative Labs
are stupendously out of line with reality. They have no reason to
engage in discourse about such details of their products with anyone
who doesn't have a legitimate business need to know. An immature-
acting, end-user customer will never qualify as "need to know".
Your posts have turned the corner from stupid to abusive.
If you continue this kind of behavior I will report you to your
service provider and/or law enforcement for appropriate action.
"Green Xenon [Radium]" wrote ...
> Okay, several things.
>
> People responding to me, said that my original post stated I wanted to
> kill people at Creative Technology. Feel free to quote when and where I
> said anything about wanting to kill anyone. I just wish for them to be
> punished -- not killed.
You are too emotionally unstable and seemingly incapable of
rational thought to be worthy of further discourse here IMHO.
> BTW, if Catherina didn't have anything good to tell me, then she should've
> just kept quiet and not answered me at all. When you ask a company about
> one of its products, you expects an answer about the product, not some
> nonsense about your question being removed because it was posted to
> different forums.
You expectations of a mass-market company like Creative Labs
are stupendously out of line with reality. They have no reason to
engage in discourse about such details of their products with anyone
who doesn't have a legitimate business need to know. An immature-
acting, end-user customer will never qualify as "need to know".
Your posts have turned the corner from stupid to abusive.
If you continue this kind of behavior I will report you to your
service provider and/or law enforcement for appropriate action.
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
Richard Crowley wrote:
> "Green Xenon [Radium]" wrote ...
>> Okay, several things.
>>
>> People responding to me, said that my original post stated I wanted to
>> kill people at Creative Technology. Feel free to quote when and where I
>> said anything about wanting to kill anyone. I just wish for them to be
>> punished -- not killed.
>
> You are too emotionally unstable and seemingly incapable of
> rational thought to be worthy of further discourse here IMHO.
>
>> BTW, if Catherina didn't have anything good to tell me, then she should've
>> just kept quiet and not answered me at all. When you ask a company about
>> one of its products, you expects an answer about the product, not some
>> nonsense about your question being removed because it was posted to
>> different forums.
>
> You expectations of a mass-market company like Creative Labs
> are stupendously out of line with reality. They have no reason to
> engage in discourse about such details of their products with anyone
> who doesn't have a legitimate business need to know. An immature-
> acting, end-user customer will never qualify as "need to know".
>
> Your posts have turned the corner from stupid to abusive.
> If you continue this kind of behavior I will report you to your
> service provider and/or law enforcement for appropriate action.
>
>
Here is the post I made which Catherina rudely turned down:
* forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=62380&query.id=69090#M62380
Richard Crowley wrote:
> "Green Xenon [Radium]" wrote ...
>> Okay, several things.
>>
>> People responding to me, said that my original post stated I wanted to
>> kill people at Creative Technology. Feel free to quote when and where I
>> said anything about wanting to kill anyone. I just wish for them to be
>> punished -- not killed.
>
> You are too emotionally unstable and seemingly incapable of
> rational thought to be worthy of further discourse here IMHO.
>
>> BTW, if Catherina didn't have anything good to tell me, then she should've
>> just kept quiet and not answered me at all. When you ask a company about
>> one of its products, you expects an answer about the product, not some
>> nonsense about your question being removed because it was posted to
>> different forums.
>
> You expectations of a mass-market company like Creative Labs
> are stupendously out of line with reality. They have no reason to
> engage in discourse about such details of their products with anyone
> who doesn't have a legitimate business need to know. An immature-
> acting, end-user customer will never qualify as "need to know".
>
> Your posts have turned the corner from stupid to abusive.
> If you continue this kind of behavior I will report you to your
> service provider and/or law enforcement for appropriate action.
>
>
Here is the post I made which Catherina rudely turned down:
* forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=62380&query.id=69090#M62380
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
Green Xenon [Radium] wrote:
> Richard Crowley wrote:
>> "Green Xenon [Radium]" wrote ...
>>> Okay, several things.
>>>
>>> People responding to me, said that my original post stated I wanted
>>> to kill people at Creative Technology. Feel free to quote when and
>>> where I said anything about wanting to kill anyone. I just wish for
>>> them to be punished -- not killed.
>>
>> You are too emotionally unstable and seemingly incapable of
>> rational thought to be worthy of further discourse here IMHO.
>>
>>> BTW, if Catherina didn't have anything good to tell me, then she
>>> should've just kept quiet and not answered me at all. When you ask a
>>> company about one of its products, you expects an answer about the
>>> product, not some nonsense about your question being removed because
>>> it was posted to different forums.
>>
>> You expectations of a mass-market company like Creative Labs
>> are stupendously out of line with reality. They have no reason to
>> engage in discourse about such details of their products with anyone
>> who doesn't have a legitimate business need to know. An immature-
>> acting, end-user customer will never qualify as "need to know".
>>
>> Your posts have turned the corner from stupid to abusive.
>> If you continue this kind of behavior I will report you to your
>> service provider and/or law enforcement for appropriate action.
>>
>
>
> Here is the post I made which Catherina rudely turned down:
>
> * forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=62380&query.id=69090#M62380
>
Judging from that link, you must be a complete numbnut. WTF do you
expect a moderator to do when you post multiple threads saying the same
thing?
--
"I've also noted that a couple of my regular spammers
have pretty much switched over to phishing and 419s
from pecker pills and sawdust tablets." - Bar0
"If it's from BRNIC, it's GOT to be blocked" - Buss Error
Green Xenon [Radium] wrote:
> Richard Crowley wrote:
>> "Green Xenon [Radium]" wrote ...
>>> Okay, several things.
>>>
>>> People responding to me, said that my original post stated I wanted
>>> to kill people at Creative Technology. Feel free to quote when and
>>> where I said anything about wanting to kill anyone. I just wish for
>>> them to be punished -- not killed.
>>
>> You are too emotionally unstable and seemingly incapable of
>> rational thought to be worthy of further discourse here IMHO.
>>
>>> BTW, if Catherina didn't have anything good to tell me, then she
>>> should've just kept quiet and not answered me at all. When you ask a
>>> company about one of its products, you expects an answer about the
>>> product, not some nonsense about your question being removed because
>>> it was posted to different forums.
>>
>> You expectations of a mass-market company like Creative Labs
>> are stupendously out of line with reality. They have no reason to
>> engage in discourse about such details of their products with anyone
>> who doesn't have a legitimate business need to know. An immature-
>> acting, end-user customer will never qualify as "need to know".
>>
>> Your posts have turned the corner from stupid to abusive.
>> If you continue this kind of behavior I will report you to your
>> service provider and/or law enforcement for appropriate action.
>>
>
>
> Here is the post I made which Catherina rudely turned down:
>
> * forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=62380&query.id=69090#M62380
>
Judging from that link, you must be a complete numbnut. WTF do you
expect a moderator to do when you post multiple threads saying the same
thing?
--
"I've also noted that a couple of my regular spammers
have pretty much switched over to phishing and 419s
from pecker pills and sawdust tablets." - Bar0
"If it's from BRNIC, it's GOT to be blocked" - Buss Error
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
"WindsorFox" wrote:
> Green Xenon [Radium] wrote:
> >
> > Here is the post I made which Catherina rudely turned down:
> >
> > * forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=62380&query.id=69090#M62380
>
> Judging from that link, you must be a complete numbnut.
You haven't met 'Radium' before presumably. He's quite cracked.
> WTF do you expect a moderator to do when you post multiple threads saying the same
> thing?
You mean he actually said something ? It seemed to be entirely content free to me. Maybe if he'd asked a sensible
question he might got a reply. Instead he said the equivalent of "I'm a Creative Labs groupie" and expected to be
lauded or whatever.
Graham
"WindsorFox" wrote:
> Green Xenon [Radium] wrote:
> >
> > Here is the post I made which Catherina rudely turned down:
> >
> > * forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=62380&query.id=69090#M62380
>
> Judging from that link, you must be a complete numbnut.
You haven't met 'Radium' before presumably. He's quite cracked.
> WTF do you expect a moderator to do when you post multiple threads saying the same
> thing?
You mean he actually said something ? It seemed to be entirely content free to me. Maybe if he'd asked a sensible
question he might got a reply. Instead he said the equivalent of "I'm a Creative Labs groupie" and expected to be
lauded or whatever.
Graham
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
Eeyore wrote:
>
> "WindsorFox" wrote:
>
>> Green Xenon [Radium] wrote:
>>> Here is the post I made which Catherina rudely turned down:
>>>
>>> * forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=62380&query.id=69090#M62380
>> Judging from that link, you must be a complete numbnut.
>
> You haven't met 'Radium' before presumably. He's quite cracked.
>
When he told me I Had to convert all my music files to mono was
pretty much the first time I took notice.
>
>> WTF do you expect a moderator to do when you post multiple threads saying the same
>> thing?
>
> You mean he actually said something ? It seemed to be entirely content free to me. Maybe if he'd asked a sensible
> question he might got a reply. Instead he said the equivalent of "I'm a Creative Labs groupie" and expected to be
> lauded or whatever.
>
> Graham
>
On *my* forums I'd have deleted all the posts that had word but no
point.
--
"I've also noted that a couple of my regular spammers
have pretty much switched over to phishing and 419s
from pecker pills and sawdust tablets." - Bar0
"If it's from BRNIC, it's GOT to be blocked" - Buss Error
Eeyore wrote:
>
> "WindsorFox" wrote:
>
>> Green Xenon [Radium] wrote:
>>> Here is the post I made which Catherina rudely turned down:
>>>
>>> * forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=62380&query.id=69090#M62380
>> Judging from that link, you must be a complete numbnut.
>
> You haven't met 'Radium' before presumably. He's quite cracked.
>
When he told me I Had to convert all my music files to mono was
pretty much the first time I took notice.
>
>> WTF do you expect a moderator to do when you post multiple threads saying the same
>> thing?
>
> You mean he actually said something ? It seemed to be entirely content free to me. Maybe if he'd asked a sensible
> question he might got a reply. Instead he said the equivalent of "I'm a Creative Labs groupie" and expected to be
> lauded or whatever.
>
> Graham
>
On *my* forums I'd have deleted all the posts that had word but no
point.
--
"I've also noted that a couple of my regular spammers
have pretty much switched over to phishing and 419s
from pecker pills and sawdust tablets." - Bar0
"If it's from BRNIC, it's GOT to be blocked" - Buss Error
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
WindsorFox<SS> wrote:
> Green Xenon [Radium] wrote:
>> Richard Crowley wrote:
>>> "Green Xenon [Radium]" wrote ...
>>>> Okay, several things.
>>>>
>>>> People responding to me, said that my original post stated I wanted
>>>> to kill people at Creative Technology. Feel free to quote when and
>>>> where I said anything about wanting to kill anyone. I just wish for
>>>> them to be punished -- not killed.
>>>
>>> You are too emotionally unstable and seemingly incapable of
>>> rational thought to be worthy of further discourse here IMHO.
>>>
>>>> BTW, if Catherina didn't have anything good to tell me, then she
>>>> should've just kept quiet and not answered me at all. When you ask a
>>>> company about one of its products, you expects an answer about the
>>>> product, not some nonsense about your question being removed because
>>>> it was posted to different forums.
>>>
>>> You expectations of a mass-market company like Creative Labs
>>> are stupendously out of line with reality. They have no reason to
>>> engage in discourse about such details of their products with anyone
>>> who doesn't have a legitimate business need to know. An immature-
>>> acting, end-user customer will never qualify as "need to know".
>>>
>>> Your posts have turned the corner from stupid to abusive.
>>> If you continue this kind of behavior I will report you to your
>>> service provider and/or law enforcement for appropriate action.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Here is the post I made which Catherina rudely turned down:
>>
>> * forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=62380&query.id=69090#M62380
>>
>
> Judging from that link, you must be a complete numbnut. WTF do you
> expect a moderator to do when you post multiple threads saying the same
> thing?
>
Well, I'm not the only Creative-Music-Synth-lover they mistreated.
Here are some other victims of the evil Creative Technology:
* forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=110128&query.id=98885#M110128
* forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=4880&query.id=98921#M4880
See that?????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
So CMS-advocates -- like me -- have reason to be outraged at
CT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WindsorFox<SS> wrote:
> Green Xenon [Radium] wrote:
>> Richard Crowley wrote:
>>> "Green Xenon [Radium]" wrote ...
>>>> Okay, several things.
>>>>
>>>> People responding to me, said that my original post stated I wanted
>>>> to kill people at Creative Technology. Feel free to quote when and
>>>> where I said anything about wanting to kill anyone. I just wish for
>>>> them to be punished -- not killed.
>>>
>>> You are too emotionally unstable and seemingly incapable of
>>> rational thought to be worthy of further discourse here IMHO.
>>>
>>>> BTW, if Catherina didn't have anything good to tell me, then she
>>>> should've just kept quiet and not answered me at all. When you ask a
>>>> company about one of its products, you expects an answer about the
>>>> product, not some nonsense about your question being removed because
>>>> it was posted to different forums.
>>>
>>> You expectations of a mass-market company like Creative Labs
>>> are stupendously out of line with reality. They have no reason to
>>> engage in discourse about such details of their products with anyone
>>> who doesn't have a legitimate business need to know. An immature-
>>> acting, end-user customer will never qualify as "need to know".
>>>
>>> Your posts have turned the corner from stupid to abusive.
>>> If you continue this kind of behavior I will report you to your
>>> service provider and/or law enforcement for appropriate action.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Here is the post I made which Catherina rudely turned down:
>>
>> * forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=62380&query.id=69090#M62380
>>
>
> Judging from that link, you must be a complete numbnut. WTF do you
> expect a moderator to do when you post multiple threads saying the same
> thing?
>
Well, I'm not the only Creative-Music-Synth-lover they mistreated.
Here are some other victims of the evil Creative Technology:
* forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=110128&query.id=98885#M110128
* forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=4880&query.id=98921#M4880
See that?????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
So CMS-advocates -- like me -- have reason to be outraged at
CT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
Green Xenon [Radium] wrote:
> Well, I'm not the only Creative-Music-Synth-lover they mistreated.
>
> Here are some other victims of the evil Creative Technology:
>
> * forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=110128&query.id=98885#M110128
>
>
> * forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=4880&query.id=98921#M4880
>
>
> See that?????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
>
> So CMS-advocates -- like me -- have reason to be outraged at
> CT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
See the stuff on those links?! Two FM-enthusiasts politely asked about
Creative Music Synth only to be ignored. Creative Technology completed
neglected these civilized customers.
Anyone should be able to understand why victims of CT [such as the two
in the above links] wish harm on CT.
Green Xenon [Radium] wrote:
> Well, I'm not the only Creative-Music-Synth-lover they mistreated.
>
> Here are some other victims of the evil Creative Technology:
>
> * forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=110128&query.id=98885#M110128
>
>
> * forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=4880&query.id=98921#M4880
>
>
> See that?????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
>
> So CMS-advocates -- like me -- have reason to be outraged at
> CT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
See the stuff on those links?! Two FM-enthusiasts politely asked about
Creative Music Synth only to be ignored. Creative Technology completed
neglected these civilized customers.
Anyone should be able to understand why victims of CT [such as the two
in the above links] wish harm on CT.
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
Green Xenon [Radium] wrote:
> See the stuff on those links?! Two FM-enthusiasts politely asked about
> Creative Music Synth only to be ignored. Creative Technology completed
> neglected these civilized customers.
>
> Anyone should be able to understand why victims of CT [such as the two
> in the above links] wish harm on CT.
No. It is totally not reasonable for people to wish harm to others, or a
company, over something so trivial.
Of couse, nothing is trivial to you , is it. You should be able to
recognise when your syndrome is getting th better of your reasoning, and up
the medication or whatever.
geoff
Green Xenon [Radium] wrote:
> See the stuff on those links?! Two FM-enthusiasts politely asked about
> Creative Music Synth only to be ignored. Creative Technology completed
> neglected these civilized customers.
>
> Anyone should be able to understand why victims of CT [such as the two
> in the above links] wish harm on CT.
No. It is totally not reasonable for people to wish harm to others, or a
company, over something so trivial.
Of couse, nothing is trivial to you , is it. You should be able to
recognise when your syndrome is getting th better of your reasoning, and up
the medication or whatever.
geoff
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
Green Xenon [Radium] <glucegen1@excite . com > wrote:
: Green Xenon [Radium] wrote:
:> Well, I'm not the only Creative-Music-Synth-lover they mistreated.
:>
:> Here are some other victims of the evil Creative Technology:
:>
:> * forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=110128&query.id=98885#M110128
:>
:>
:> * forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=4880&query.id=98921#M4880
:>
:>
:> See that?????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
:>
:> So CMS-advocates -- like me -- have reason to be outraged at
:> CT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
: See the stuff on those links?! Two FM-enthusiasts politely asked about
: Creative Music Synth only to be ignored. Creative Technology completed
: neglected these civilized customers.
Those are user forums, not tech support archives. So the lack of response is
due to lack of *user* interest, knowledge, or whatever.
-- Andy Barss
Green Xenon [Radium] <glucegen1@excite . com > wrote:
: Green Xenon [Radium] wrote:
:> Well, I'm not the only Creative-Music-Synth-lover they mistreated.
:>
:> Here are some other victims of the evil Creative Technology:
:>
:> * forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=110128&query.id=98885#M110128
:>
:>
:> * forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=4880&query.id=98921#M4880
:>
:>
:> See that?????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
:>
:> So CMS-advocates -- like me -- have reason to be outraged at
:> CT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
: See the stuff on those links?! Two FM-enthusiasts politely asked about
: Creative Music Synth only to be ignored. Creative Technology completed
: neglected these civilized customers.
Those are user forums, not tech support archives. So the lack of response is
due to lack of *user* interest, knowledge, or whatever.
-- Andy Barss
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
"Green Xenon [Radium]" wrote:
> Here is the post I made which Catherina rudely turned down:
>
> * forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=62380&query.id=69090#M62380
It's a nonsense post with no context or content. It's easy to see why the others were deleted.
Graham
"Green Xenon [Radium]" wrote:
> Here is the post I made which Catherina rudely turned down:
>
> * forums.creative . com /creativelabs/board/message?board.id=soundblaster&message.id=62380&query.id=69090#M62380
It's a nonsense post with no context or content. It's easy to see why the others were deleted.
Graham
Re: OT: revenge against Creative Technology
On Thu, 08 May 2008 18:03:44 -0700, "Green Xenon [Radium]"
<glucegen1@excite . com > wrote:
>Hi:
>
>Creative Music Synth is my favorite soundcard-MIDI-synth.
>
>Sadly for me, Creative Technology does not want to talk about Creative
>Music Synth. I've contacted them in almost any way, shape, and form but
>not gotten any good info. I rarely get a response and when I do, it's
>usually crap. They told me, SB PCI 128 and Ensoniq contains Creative
>Music Synth. I already knew they were wrong because one of my friends
>has both those cards. I've checked the MIDI output for both those cards
>-- no Creative Music Synth. Creative Technology are a bunch of liars.
>
>I feel like burning their skins off to extract their intellectual
>property. I want to force them to reveal each and every technical aspect
>of Creative Music Synth to me. I want to sear their skins with yellow
>fire whenever they refuse to give me the correct info. If they ignore
>me, I want to burn them. If they intentionally give me the wrong answer,
>I want to burn them.
>
>Burn Creative Technology to forcibly steal their intellectual property
>rights. Do this interrogation style.
>
>Creative Technology are a bunch of jerks who deserve to be burnt alive
>with scalding molten hot stinky cheddar cheese and then with yellow fires.
>
>I want to heinously torture and humiliate these sickos until they
>provide each and every bit of their info.
>
>I politely asked them about information on Creative Music Synth. One
>person named "Catherina" responded. This was the only reply I ever got
>to my question. Before I read the reply, I was jubilant. I was extremely
>optimistic and thought that person would assist me and tell me how
>Creative Music Synth works and other wonderful technical details. I
>couldn't have been more wrong.
>
>The message by the Cathy b!+C# read "I've removed this message and any
>similar messages because you posted them to more than one forum"
>
>I was so upset and disappointed. I just wanted to find out where that
>piece of Kathy human kakaa lives and burn her alive -- along with the
>rest of Creative Technology.
>
>I really have a hard time not wishing harm on cold-hearted scum like
>Creative Technology and its "Catherina".
>
>Burn Catherina and Creative Technology. Burn them with stinky scalding
>molten hot stinky cheddar cheese and then with yellow fires.
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Radium
Creative tech support is located in the small town in Oklahoma that I
live in. They are here because of the crappy wage scale and not the
technical acumen of the local denizens. Chuck
On Thu, 08 May 2008 18:03:44 -0700, "Green Xenon [Radium]"
<glucegen1@excite . com > wrote:
>Hi:
>
>Creative Music Synth is my favorite soundcard-MIDI-synth.
>
>Sadly for me, Creative Technology does not want to talk about Creative
>Music Synth. I've contacted them in almost any way, shape, and form but
>not gotten any good info. I rarely get a response and when I do, it's
>usually crap. They told me, SB PCI 128 and Ensoniq contains Creative
>Music Synth. I already knew they were wrong because one of my friends
>has both those cards. I've checked the MIDI output for both those cards
>-- no Creative Music Synth. Creative Technology are a bunch of liars.
>
>I feel like burning their skins off to extract their intellectual
>property. I want to force them to reveal each and every technical aspect
>of Creative Music Synth to me. I want to sear their skins with yellow
>fire whenever they refuse to give me the correct info. If they ignore
>me, I want to burn them. If they intentionally give me the wrong answer,
>I want to burn them.
>
>Burn Creative Technology to forcibly steal their intellectual property
>rights. Do this interrogation style.
>
>Creative Technology are a bunch of jerks who deserve to be burnt alive
>with scalding molten hot stinky cheddar cheese and then with yellow fires.
>
>I want to heinously torture and humiliate these sickos until they
>provide each and every bit of their info.
>
>I politely asked them about information on Creative Music Synth. One
>person named "Catherina" responded. This was the only reply I ever got
>to my question. Before I read the reply, I was jubilant. I was extremely
>optimistic and thought that person would assist me and tell me how
>Creative Music Synth works and other wonderful technical details. I
>couldn't have been more wrong.
>
>The message by the Cathy b!+C# read "I've removed this message and any
>similar messages because you posted them to more than one forum"
>
>I was so upset and disappointed. I just wanted to find out where that
>piece of Kathy human kakaa lives and burn her alive -- along with the
>rest of Creative Technology.
>
>I really have a hard time not wishing harm on cold-hearted scum like
>Creative Technology and its "Catherina".
>
>Burn Catherina and Creative Technology. Burn them with stinky scalding
>molten hot stinky cheddar cheese and then with yellow fires.
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Radium
Creative tech support is located in the small town in Oklahoma that I
live in. They are here because of the crappy wage scale and not the
technical acumen of the local denizens. Chuck
