Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss!

Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss!

Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss! And to the rest of the Irish!

Kind regards,

Gray Glasser

Re: Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss!

On Mar 17, 12:46 am, glassg...@yahoo,com wrote:
> Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss! And to the rest of the Irish!
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Gray Glasser

Green and beloved forever.

Andre Jute
Time to start drinking

Re: Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss!

On Mar 16, 8:54 pm, Andre Jute <fiul...@yahoo,com > wrote:
> On Mar 17, 12:46 am, glassg...@yahoo,com wrote:
>
> > Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss! And to the rest of the Irish!
>
> > Kind regards,
>
> > Gray Glasser
>
> Green and beloved forever.
>
> Andre Jute
> Time to start drinking

Funny thing, writing of Irish jokes. Only spavined South Africans talk
to themselves without benefit of Guiness.

X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us)
AppleWebKit/523.15.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.4 Safari/
523.15,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)


X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us)
AppleWebKit/523.15.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.4 Safari/
523.15,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)

Same software, same system, same machine.

Same trace also.

Andre, you were clever enough to use a different anonymous remailer,
but not hardly clever enough to use a different machine. Has it come
to this that you just *MUST* bring attention to yourself via
sockpuppets? Are not your several adoring fans enough?

You are pathetic.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

Several Irishmen are standing over the grave of their friend
contemplating his last wish. It seems that Paddy wanted a bottle of
Jamison poured over his fresh grave. The group thought on it a while
and with considerable lively discussion decided that Paddy was such a
good friend that he would not mind them filtering the Irish through
their kidneys first.

Re: Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss!



Peter Wieck wrote:

> Andre, you were clever enough to use a different anonymous remailer,
> but not hardly clever enough to use a different machine. Has it come
> to this that you just *MUST* bring attention to yourself via
> sockpuppets? Are not your several adoring fans enough?
>
> You are pathetic.
>
> Peter Wieck
> Wyncote, PA

Well spotted Sir ! You are totally correct.

glassgray IS Android Joot.

How UTTERLY PATHETIC.


Graham

Re: Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss!

Graham "Poopie" Stevenson, a slow-earning ass who goes by the nym
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail,com > wrote:
> Peter Wieck wrote:
> > Andre, you were clever enough to use a different anonymous remailer,
> > but not hardly clever enough to use a different machine. Has it come
> > to this that you just *MUST* bring attention to yourself via
> > sockpuppets? Are not your several adoring fans enough?
>
> > You are pathetic.
>
> > Peter Wieck
> > Wyncote, PA
>
> Well spotted Sir ! You are totally correct.
>
> glassgray IS Android Joot.
>
> How UTTERLY PATHETIC.
>
> Graham

You poor dumb fuck, Poopie. You have just proved once more that you
know zero about how computers work. Do you know any more about
electronics than you do about computers? Read on and discover how I
set you up for this brilliant St Patrick's Day joke, you poor slow
learner (even Arny learned eventually to back off when I smiled at
him):

Peter Wieck <pfjw@aol,com > wrote:

> On Mar 16, 8:54 pm, Andre Jute <fiul...@yahoo,com > wrote:
> > On Mar 17, 12:46 am, glassg...@yahoo,com wrote:
> >
> > > Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss! And to the rest of the Irish!
> >
> > > Kind regards,
> >
> > > Gray Glasser
> >
> > Green and beloved forever.
> >
> > Andre Jute
> > Time to start drinking

Poor Worthless Peter Wieck demonstrates once more that he is a truly
useless netstalker. Here he tries to prove that Gray Glasser and I are
the same person.

> Funny thing, writing of Irish jokes. Only spavined South Africans talk
> to themselves without benefit of Guiness.
>
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us)
> AppleWebKit/523.15.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.4 Safari/
> 523.15,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
>
>
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us)
> AppleWebKit/523.15.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.4 Safari/
> 523.15,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)

Quite. Gray and I were put onto a proxy server by another intermittent
RATter.

> Same software, same system, same machine.

Of course it is, you poor little man, Worthless Wiecky, you. It is one
machine sitting at a proxy server somewhere in a distant country. It
takes the messages from everyone who subscribes to the service and
resends them -- after stripping off all identifying detail.

> Same trace also.

What trace? You really are an ignoramus, Worthless Wiecky. Just today
Google finds "about 297,000" Macs using Mozilla 5.0 and the rest of
it.
http :// www .google,com /search?client=safari&rls=en-us&q=Mozilla/5.0+(Macintosh;+U;+PPC+Mac+OS+X;+en-us)&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

Are all those 297,000 users Gray and me? LOL.

Or let's see who uses the latest Apple WebKit, but that would be too
many, so let's say in conjunction with the latest version of Safari.
Just now Google finds "about 14800".
http :// www .google,com /search?hl=en&client=safari&rls=en-us&q=AppleWebKit%2F523.15.1+%28KHTML%2C+like+Gecko%29&btnG=Search

Oops. Are all those 14800 people Gray and me? LOL.

What a wanker this Worthless Wiecky is.

> Andre, you were clever enough to use a different anonymous remailer,
> but not hardly clever enough to use a different machine. Has it come
> to this that you just *MUST* bring attention to yourself via
> sockpuppets? Are not your several adoring fans enough?
>
> You are pathetic.

No, you're the pathetic one, Worthless Wiecky. I asked Gray to send me
an innocuous message to set you up for this fall, dear Worthless
Wiecky, because I knew you would once more try to make the stupid case
that Gray is me. I also knew that the old and new slimeballs on RAT,
who all fancy themselves computer mavens, would dive into the same
staked pit. So I kill two dungbeetles with one graunch of my heel: I
prove once more that you're a soiled underjocksniffer (and not even
competent at underjock sniffing), dear Worthless Wiecky, and I prove
that these self-declared "computer experts" don't know shit about
computers.

> Peter Wieck
> Wyncote, PA

And here's a list of the comptuter ignoramuses who have already put
their reputations (?!?)on the line to confirm Worthless Wiecky's gross
error:
Peter Wieck <pfjw@aol,com > aka Worthless Wiecky
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail,com > aka Graham "Poopie"
Stevenson
flipper <flipper@fish,net > aka SlipSlop the SlipShod
keithr <keithr@nowhere,com .au>, an anonymous clown

Watch this space for more computer semi-literates posturing.
ROTHFLMAO!

Now that's the best Irish practical joke this St Patrick's Day (1).
Oh, what a grand day!

Andre Jute
Visit Jute on Amps at http :// members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/

(1) Almost as good as the one I made about fifteen years ago with an
eel on a major highway that in officially snakefree Ireland (St
Patrick chased them out, see?) I declared a snake and had rushed up to
the university by ambulance, complete with newspaper and television
coverage, and celebrities lining up to adopt the "poor orphaned
snake". Some of them still look nervous when they see me coming...

STATUTORY DECLARATION
No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of Andre Jute's golem
Peter Wieck aka Worthless Wieckless. I made him by stuffing a pig's
bladder with offal. --- CE Certificate of Conformity

Re: Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss!



Andre Jute wrote:

> You poor dumb fuck, Poopie

PISS OFF CUNT !

Re: Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss!

On Mar 18, 6:37 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail,com >
wrote:
> Andre Jute wrote:
> > You poor dumb fuck, Poopie
>
> PISS OFF CUNT !

Poor Poopie, the self-declared computer expert, was shown up as a
computer-illiterate. And now he has lost it totally. Oh, dear, poor
dumb fuck, Poopie...

Re: Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss!



"Peter Wieck" <pfjw@aol,com > wrote in message
news:b2884b82-ee97-487a-a319-095efdd2f0e2@z38g2000hsc.googlegroups,com ...

> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us)
> AppleWebKit/523.15.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.4 Safari/
> 523.15,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)


From where do you get this info, Peter?

Re: Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss!

On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:29:33 +0200, "Iain Churches"
<IainNG@kolumbus.fi> wrote:

>
>
>"Peter Wieck" <pfjw@aol,com > wrote in message
>news:b2884b82-ee97-487a-a319-095efdd2f0e2@z38g2000hsc.googlegroups,com ...
>
>> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us)
>> AppleWebKit/523.15.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.4 Safari/
>> 523.15,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
>
>
>From where do you get this info, Peter?
>
>
>

In Outlook Express, right click on the message in the preview pane and
select properties, then the details tab.

Re: Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss!

On Mar 17, 3:19 pm, flipper <flip...@fish,net > wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:29:33 +0200, "Iain Churches"
>
> <Iai...@kolumbus.fi> wrote:
>
> >"Peter Wieck" <p...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >news:b2884b82-ee97-487a-a319-095efdd2f0e2@z38g2000hsc.googlegroups,com ...
>
> >> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us)
> >> AppleWebKit/523.15.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.4 Safari/
> >> 523.15,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
>
> >From where do you get this info, Peter?
>
> In Outlook Express, right click on the message in the preview pane and
> select properties, then the details tab.

Yep. That's the way. Each reader has its own very similar system, but
the end-results are the same.

Every machine has a unique signature which cannot be disguised by the
"typical" anonymous remailer - at least not since 9/11. One cannot get
(easily) to a location or an original e-mail address, but one can
determine whether the same machine sent various messages.

What set me onto it was that there were two message within eight
minutes of each other at 2:46am and 2:54am both Irish time. One
through a South African remailer, one through a Pacific Rim remailer.
Go figure. And, South Africa is two hours different from Ireland such
that the time-stamps could not work anyway - nor a Pacific Rim time-
stamp of course.

It is really too bad. Andre could have made a much more credible
effort simply by going to a local internet cafe or computer seller and
ask for a demonstration or some such. He must have been drinking (more
than usual, that is) to be caught in so transparent a lie. Or he could
have messed with the time-stamp on his computer making the lie less
obvious.

Equally too bad that the Italian Sock-Puppet e-mails are so far back -
it might have been possible to discern the origin of them as well very
likely putting Andre into another lie.

Ah, well...

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

Re: Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss!



Peter Wieck wrote:

> flipper <flip...@fish,net > wrote:
> > "Iain Churches" <Iai...@kolumbus.fi> wrote:
> > >"Peter Wieck" <p...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > >> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us)
> > >> AppleWebKit/523.15.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.4 Safari/
> > >> 523.15,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
> >
> > >From where do you get this info, Peter?
> >
> > In Outlook Express, right click on the message in the preview pane and
> > select properties, then the details tab.
>
> Yep. That's the way. Each reader has its own very similar system, but
> the end-results are the same.
>
> Every machine has a unique signature which cannot be disguised by the
> "typical" anonymous remailer - at least not since 9/11. One cannot get
> (easily) to a location or an original e-mail address, but one can
> determine whether the same machine sent various messages.
>
> What set me onto it was that there were two message within eight
> minutes of each other at 2:46am and 2:54am both Irish time. One
> through a South African remailer, one through a Pacific Rim remailer.
> Go figure. And, South Africa is two hours different from Ireland such
> that the time-stamps could not work anyway - nor a Pacific Rim time-
> stamp of course.
>
> It is really too bad. Andre could have made a much more credible
> effort simply by going to a local internet cafe or computer seller and
> ask for a demonstration or some such. He must have been drinking (more
> than usual, that is) to be caught in so transparent a lie. Or he could
> have messed with the time-stamp on his computer making the lie less
> obvious.
>
> Equally too bad that the Italian Sock-Puppet e-mails are so far back -
> it might have been possible to discern the origin of them as well very
> likely putting Andre into another lie.

I recall seing the same activity months ago. Might have been the glassgray
sock-puppet again, I don't recall now.

Joot is a worthless turd anyway. If anyone had any doubts, hopefully this will
clear that up. I mean .... just how LOW is he prepared to go ?

Graham

Re: Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss!

On Mar 17, 8:05 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail,com >
wrote:
> Peter Wieck wrote:
> > flipper <flip...@fish,net > wrote:
> > >  "Iain Churches" <Iai...@kolumbus.fi> wrote:
> > > >"Peter Wieck" <p...@aol,com > wrote in message
>
> > > >> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us)
> > > >> AppleWebKit/523.15.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.4 Safari/
> > > >> 523.15,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
>
> > > >From where do you get this info, Peter?
>
> > > In Outlook Express, right click on the message in the preview pane and
> > > select properties, then the details tab.
>
> > Yep. That's the way. Each reader has its own very similar system, but
> > the end-results are the same.
>
> > Every machine has a unique signature which cannot be disguised by the
> > "typical" anonymous remailer - at least not since 9/11. One cannot get
> > (easily) to a location or an original e-mail address, but one can
> > determine whether the same machine sent various messages.
>
> > What set me onto it was that there were two message within eight
> > minutes of each other at 2:46am and 2:54am both Irish time. One
> > through a South African remailer, one through a Pacific Rim remailer.
> > Go figure. And, South Africa is two hours different from Ireland such
> > that the time-stamps could not work anyway - nor a Pacific Rim time-
> > stamp of course.
>
> > It is really too bad. Andre could have made a much more credible
> > effort simply by going to a local internet cafe or computer seller and
> > ask for a demonstration or some such. He must have been drinking (more
> > than usual, that is) to be caught in so transparent a lie. Or he could
> > have messed with the time-stamp on his computer making the lie less
> > obvious.
>
> > Equally too bad that the Italian Sock-Puppet e-mails are so far back -
> > it might have been possible to discern the origin of them as well very
> > likely putting Andre into another lie.
>
> I recall seing the same activity months ago. Might have been the glassgray
> sock-puppet again, I don't recall now.
>
> Joot is a worthless turd anyway. If anyone had any doubts, hopefully this will
> clear that up. I mean .... just how LOW is he prepared to go ?
>
> Graham

Holy shit! And you call yourself a computer expert? Don't you have any
shame? When I've finished putting down Worthless Wiecky, I shall hold
each of his errors and lies up to your nose, Poopie, and remind you
that you, a self-declared "computer expert", gave him a blanket
confirmation for his errors and lies. Ooh, this is going to be a
lovely little bonfire of undesirables. LOL.

Peter Wieck <pfjw@aol,com > wrote:

> On Mar 17, 3:19 pm, flipper <flip...@fish,net > wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:29:33 +0200, "Iain Churches"
> >
> > <Iai...@kolumbus.fi> wrote:
> >
> > >"Peter Wieck" <p...@aol,com > wrote in message
> > >news:b2884b82-ee97-487a-a319-095efdd2f0e2@z38g2000hsc.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> > >> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us)
> > >> AppleWebKit/523.15.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.4 Safari/
> > >> 523.15,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
> >
> > >From where do you get this info, Peter?
> >
> > In Outlook Express, right click on the message in the preview pane and
> > select properties, then the details tab.
>
> Yep. That's the way. Each reader has its own very similar system, but
> the end-results are the same.
>
> Every machine has a unique signature which cannot be disguised by the
> "typical" anonymous remailer - at least not since 9/11.

LOL. Hey, you poor dumb fuck, show us what is unique about the
information you claim identifies a particular computer.

And explain to us why you're such a parochial know-nothing that you
think the Finns, for instance, or the Russians, or the Chinese, care
shit about American rules made since 9/11, rules incidentally that no
one else has heard about but you.

>One cannot get
> (easily) to a location or an original e-mail address, but one can
> determine whether the same machine sent various messages.

Oh, one machine sent those messages. It belongs to the proxy server.
But I have already found seven machines with the same supposedly
"unique signature" in just two minutes. You're stupid or you're lying,
Worthless Wiecky. Which is it?

> What set me onto it was that there were two message within eight
> minutes of each other at 2:46am and 2:54am both Irish time. One
> through a South African remailer, one through a Pacific Rim remailer.
> Go figure. And, South Africa is two hours different from Ireland such
> that the time-stamps could not work anyway - nor a Pacific Rim time-
> stamp of course.
>
> It is really too bad. Andre could have made a much more credible
> effort simply by going to a local internet cafe or computer seller and
> ask for a demonstration or some such. He must have been drinking (more
> than usual, that is) to be caught in so transparent a lie.

Oh, I haven't been caught in a lie. You've been caught in a little
joke I set up specifically for you to take a pratfall.

>Or he could
> have messed with the time-stamp on his computer making the lie less
> obvious.

Why? All I had to do was wait until the post I requested from Gray to
set you up arrived in my reader, and then to answer it.

> Equally too bad that the Italian Sock-Puppet e-mails are so far back -
> it might have been possible to discern the origin of them as well very
> likely putting Andre into another lie.

Who is this "Italian Sock-Puppet" and what were his "e-mails" about?
And why should Google have lost his e-mails in particular when it
keeps everything else?

> Ah, well...
>
> Peter Wieck
> Wyncote, PA

Re: Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss!

On Mar 17, 7:17 pm, Andre Jute <fiul...@yahoo,com > wrote:

> Tripe.

Andre, you got caught. You can bleat, blather, protest, whine, pule
and rant. You can make your usual exhortations, you can make your
usual accusations but nothing changes.

You drank too much, you could not control your arrogance, and you got
caught.

Spin all you want, you still got caught. End of story. Learn something
so next time you can do better. And find another sock-puppet.
Glassgrey has gone past its use-before date and only serves to
embarass you further.

You are pathetic.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

Re: Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss!

Poor Worthless Peter Wieck told a lie that Gray Glasser is Andre Jute.
Even his own friends shot down Worthless Wiecky's socalled evidence
when poor Worthless Wiecky claimed that Gray and I post from the same
computer -- and then couldn't explain why there are 297,000 other
computers just like the one he claimed was unique. Then poor Worthless
Wiecky tried to blow smoke over his first set of lies by claiming no
remailer uses a Mac. But that just exposed his computer ignorance.
Gray and I don't use a remailer, we use a proxy server, and there are
several of those that use Macs. Now poor Worthless Peter Wieck is down
to holding up his wishful thinking as "evidence", like an Egyptian
beggar holds up his leprous sores for alms. Pathetic. "If I cut off
another limb, will you dash me, Boss." Yech.

Even more pathetic are self-declared "engineers" who supported the
jumped-up janitor Worthless Peter Wieck in his lies. For instance,
Graham "Poopie" Stevenson, aka the ass Eeyore, wrote many times to
assure people that Worthless Wiecky got it right. Poopie Stevenson is
also a self-declared "computer expert": Poopie must have known he was
lying through his teeth when he supported Worthless Wiecky. The only
alternative Poopie being a deliberate liar is that Poopie didn't know
Worthless was lying, in short that Poopie the self-declared "computer
expert" is bog-ignorant about computers. Choose one, Poopie: did
deliberately lie or are you bog-ignorant about computers.

Or how about the slipshod Flipper, who contributed to the thread but,
knowing that Worthless Wiecky lied, let Iain Churches think that
Worthless was right. Flipper will no doubt screech to high heaven that
he only answered the question he was asked, but there isn't a church
congregation in the land who won't convict Flipper of the immoral act
of lying by omission.

I leave the netstalker Worthless Peter Wieck's wistful thinking below
for a giggle. What a sorry excuse for a human being this little jumped-
up janitor is, and always will be.

This St Patrick's Day practical joke on a bunch of pompous liars has
been brought to you with the compliments of Gray Glasser and Andre
Jute. Preppies rule forever!

LOL!

Andre Jute
Riding high in the green and beloved island

On Mar 18, 1:59 am, Peter Wieck <p...@aol,com > wrote:
> On Mar 17, 7:17 pm, Andre Jute <fiul...@yahoo,com > wrote:
>
> > Tripe.
>
> Andre, you got caught. You can bleat, blather, protest, whine, pule
> and rant. You can make your usual exhortations, you can make your
> usual accusations but nothing changes.
>
> You drank too much, you could not control your arrogance, and you got
> caught.
>
> Spin all you want, you still got caught. End of story. Learn something
> so next time you can do better. And find another sock-puppet.
> Glassgrey has gone past its use-before date and only serves to
> embarass you further.
>
> You are pathetic.
>
> Peter Wieck
> Wyncote, PA
>
> Peter Wieck
> Wyncote, PA

*****

And here are just a few of the questions poor Worthless Wiecky cannot
answer, and an explanation of how I set up the joke that trapped so
many of the scum at once into exposing their ugliest inner thoughts:

Peter Wieck <pfjw@aol,com > wrote:

> On Mar 16, 8:54 pm, Andre Jute <fiul...@yahoo,com > wrote:
> > On Mar 17, 12:46 am, glassg...@yahoo,com wrote:
> >
> > > Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss! And to the rest of the Irish!
> >
> > > Kind regards,
> >
> > > Gray Glasser
> >
> > Green and beloved forever.
> >
> > Andre Jute
> > Time to start drinking

Poor Worthless Peter Wieck demonstrates once more that he is a truly
useless netstalker. Here he tries to prove that Gray Glasser and I are
the same person.

> Funny thing, writing of Irish jokes. Only spavined South Africans talk
> to themselves without benefit of Guiness.
>
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us)
> AppleWebKit/523.15.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.4 Safari/
> 523.15,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
>
>
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us)
> AppleWebKit/523.15.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.4 Safari/
> 523.15,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)

Quite. Gray and I were put onto a proxy server by another intermittent
RATter.

> Same software, same system, same machine.

Of course it is, you poor little man, Worthless Wiecky, you. It is one
machine sitting at a proxy server somewhere in a distant country. It
takes the messages from everyone who subscribes to the service and
resends them -- after stripping off all identifying detail.

> Same trace also.

What trace? You really are an ignoramus, Worthless Wiecky. Just today
Google finds "about 297,000" Macs using Mozilla 5.0 and the rest of
it.
http :// www .google,com /search?client=safari&rls=en-us&q=Mozilla/5.0+(Macintosh;+U;+PPC+Mac+OS+X;+en-us)&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

Are all those 297,000 users Gray and me? LOL.

Or let's see who uses the latest Apple WebKit, but that would be too
many, so let's say in conjunction with the latest version of Safari.
Just now Google finds "about 14800".
http :// www .google,com /search?hl=en&client=safari&rls=en-us&q=AppleWebKit%2F523.15.1+%28KHTML%2C+like+Gecko%29&btnG=Search

Oops. Are all those 14800 people Gray and me? LOL.

What a wanker this Worthless Wiecky is.

> Andre, you were clever enough to use a different anonymous remailer,
> but not hardly clever enough to use a different machine. Has it come
> to this that you just *MUST* bring attention to yourself via
> sockpuppets? Are not your several adoring fans enough?
>
> You are pathetic.

No, you're the pathetic one, Worthless Wiecky. I asked Gray to send me
an innocuous message to set you up for this fall, dear Worthless
Wiecky, because I knew you would once more try to make the stupid case
that Gray is me. I also knew that the old and new slimeballs on RAT,
who all fancy themselves computer mavens, would dive into the same
staked pit. So I kill two dungbeetles with one graunch of my heel: I
prove once more that you're a soiled underjocksniffer (and not even
competent at underjock sniffing), dear Worthless Wiecky, and I prove
that these self-declared "computer experts" don't know shit about
computers.

> Peter Wieck
> Wyncote, PA

And here's a list of the comptuter ignoramuses who have already put
their reputations (?!?)on the line to confirm Worthless Wiecky's gross
error:
Peter Wieck <pfjw@aol,com > aka Worthless Wiecky
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail,com > aka Graham "Poopie"
Stevenson
flipper <flipper@fish,net > aka SlipSlop the SlipShod
keithr <keithr@nowhere,com .au>, an anonymous clown

Watch this space for more computer semi-literates posturing.
ROTHFLMAO!

Now that's the best Irish practical joke this St Patrick's Day (1).
Oh, what a grand day!

Andre Jute
Visit Jute on Amps at http :// members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/

(1) Almost as good as the one I made about fifteen years ago with an
eel on a major highway that in officially snakefree Ireland (St
Patrick chased them out, see?) I declared a snake and had rushed up to
the university by ambulance, complete with newspaper and television
coverage, and celebrities lining up to adopt the "poor orphaned
snake". Some of them still look nervous when they see me coming...

STATUTORY DECLARATION
No real corpses were harmed in the assembly of Andre Jute's golem
Peter Wieck aka Worthless Wieckless. I made him by stuffing a pig's
bladder with offal. --- CE Certificate of Conformity

Re: Happy St Patrick's Day, Boss!



Andre Jute wrote:

> Poor Worthless Peter Wieck told a lie that Gray Glasser is Andre Jute.

It's a TRUTH.

However it's no surprise to me you can't tell truth from lies.

You're a vile POS Joot.