Re: I want to do this rideOn Sun, 01 Apr 2007 08:40:16 -0700, Turby <turbosurfer@beach,com ber>
wrote:
>On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:17:24 -0500, "Stephen!" <NO@spam,com > wrote:
>
>>Turby <turbosurfer@beach,com ber> wrote in
>>news:q9hr03tedshts1st8olrslt41vc2p60nog@4ax,com :
>>
>>> but it's not a given. Also, the rear end of the truck was swinging
>>> wide, and it's impossible to tell in the video _how_ wide it was
>>> going.
>>
>> Unless it was an old tyme style rear-steer vehicle (ala Fire Truck) I
>>can PROMISE you the rear of the trailer was well inside the front of the
>>truck...
>
>The rear wheels follow in the tracks of the front. The front bumper is
>~4' in front of the front wheel. The rear bumper is ~10' behind the
>rear wheel, ergo it sticks out farther when it goes around a turn.
If I'm not mistaken , the trailer will tend to follow the
connection point, IE the REAR of the truck portion of the rig,
regardless of where the FRONT of the truck IE steering tires are /
were. Also, centrifugal force, as related to / generated by speed,
will swing it wider still. IOW, a very slow moving T/T will follow a
tighter path at the ass end than a fast moving T/T tracking the same
curve.
IOW, take the 'worst case' point of the truck ( the rear ),
and add some according to speed.
But, whatever - the point being, T/T's obviously simply don't
belong on the Dragon or similar roads, regardless of the presence or
absence of motorcycles.
The diagram here is informative
http :// www .thetruckersreport,com /turning_radius_info_for_eighteen_wheelers.shtml
--
Click here every day to feed an animal that needs you today !!!
http :// www .theanimalrescuesite,com /
Paul ( pjm @ pobox . com ) - remove spaces to email me
'Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.'
'With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.'
HVAC/R program for Palm PDA's
Free demo now available online http :// pmilligan,net /palm/