Re: Attention Connecticut lurkers!On Apr 23, 9:53 am, "Dean H." <m...@groove.calm> wrote:
> A call to action! Get busy.
>
> I got this:
>
> ATV Trails bill has passed through the Committees on Environment and
> Appropriations. Soon it will reach the House Floor for a general vote. It is
> very, very important that everyone call or email their Representative and
> Senator and ask that they support HB 5602.
>
> Find your legislator's contact info atwww .cga.ct.gov
>
> We've worked long and hard to get this far -- farther than we've gotten in
> 22 years! Please, give us a hand in opening trails (finally!) in CT. It
> WILL HAPPEN!! Thanks!!
>
> Regards,
> The CT Trail Users Community Team.
>
> http :// www .cttrailusers,com /forum/index.php
>
> So I wrote this:
>
> I am writing asking your support for HB 5602 summarized below:
> "Title: AN ACT CONCERNING THE DESIGNATION OF ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE TRAILS, A
> TRAIL USER FEE AND ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE REGISTRATION. Statement of Purpose:
> To require all purchasers of an all-terrain vehicle to pay a one per cent
> user fee, to create an all-terrain vehicle account to be used for trail
> maintenance, enforcement and administration costs of the Department of
> Environmental Protection and for grants to an all-terrain vehicle
> association for safety and education courses, and to require the Department
> of Environmental Protection to designate four trails for all-terrain vehicle
> use by January 1, 2009. "
>
> This long-overdue legislation would put some teeth into a law that has
> been unenforced for almost 22 years, Public Act 86-249, S.3. which was
> signed into law June 4, 1986.
>
> The recreational use of all-terrain vehicles is one of the great
> American pastimes and an uncommonly strong form of family sport. Currently,
> there is only one small piece of legal public riding in our entire state;
> Thomaston Dam which is a flood control area maintained by the Army Corps of
> Engineers. Only dirtbikes are allowed at Thomaston, not 4 wheeled ATVs
> (often called "quads"). Woods riding anywhere else in the state is
> semi-legal at best since it can often be difficult to know where property
> lines are. For generations, responsible riders have simply tried not to
> bother people on their properties or sharing the trail as we go about
> enjoying one of the greatest gifts of life - a challenging yet fun exercise
> experience that requires total flow concentration while taking us to
> beautiful spots that most Connecticut residents will never see. In this age
> of increasingly obese population, it is doubly important to be sure that our
> public lands offer such recreational activities. And it would be nice for
> this family sport to be conducted where riding is legal so that parents
> don't have to teach some murky lesson about which laws matter and which ones
> don't.
>
> This bill is also important in that it assures taxpayers that at least
> some of the considerable revenue that the state has expected to collect from
> ATV and dirtbike owners will be used to provide legal riding in the state.
> It is a very widely held sentiment that ATV registrations are worthless or
> worse in a state with little or no legal riding. Taxpayers expect a little
> return on their investment and HB5602 provides just that.
>
> I could go on and on but I know you are very busy. Please support
> HB5602.
>
> Sincerely,
> Dean ....
I wish you luck.
The fees collected by NY get put into a special OHV fund- which at the
end of every year gets put into the general fund.
The DEC runs all this in NY, and the spitzer-appointed head of the
DEC, Grannis, is anti-OHV and anti-hunting, except for deer. He's a
long-island lawyer, fer chrissakes!
Dave