Re: IdaSpode has been busyOn Sun, 27 Apr 2008 22:38:48 +0200, Rowdy <no-thx@gmx,net > wrote:
>CrashTestDummy wrote:
>> Sweet. I wonder how much cheaper it was to go with wood posts instead
>> of steel. Down here I've become accustomed to seeing the site leveled
>> and prepped, and the slab poured as the first order of business. Then
>> the steel beams attach to the slab and the structure goes up. But I
>> think steel is cheaper than wood in Texas ;->
>
>Exactly my thoughts.
>Over here noone would bury wood, not even in a concrete filled bucket
>per post. The wood would decay from water accumulating in said cavities.
>
>Even the A-frames of swings on children's playgrounds have the wodden
>posts caught in steel "grips" and only the 2 feet steel rods from said
>grips enter the soil.
>
>I was told wooden posts may be used 100% under water or 100% above
>ground for decades. But having them at the border between one medium
>and another will make them rot fast. (except for super dry areas
>like Arizona deserts)
>
>
>Rowdy
Well, wooden posts, or "poles," have been used throughout the
states here for years to construct barns, sheds, carports and the
like. In fact, our carport relies on pressure-treated 4x4" posts
cemented about 2.5' into the ground, and it's lasted over seven years
so far. Some pole barns are still going strong after 100 years. Often,
termites get the structures before dry rot does. But in the cases
above, all of these structures have either dirt or wood floors or, in
the case of our carport, an interior slab that doesn't touch the
posts. So it was just unusual to see DJs shop with the wood posts and
imagine a concrete slab being poured around them. It may be more
common than I imagine though.
Fred Bradford - CrashTestDummy
fjbradfordREMOVE@tx.rr,com