Re: To cover or not to coverOn Fri, 02 May 2008 23:21:02 GMT, "Tud" <tud333@hotmail,com > wrote:
>EZ wrote...
>> On Fri, 02 May 2008 22:32:03 GMT, "Tud" <tud333@hotmail,com > wrote:
>>
>>>In your case, no.
>>
>> ???
>>
>> Guess I missed the point, somewhere, but then again, I miss a lot
>> <sfsf>
>
>From the tone of your post it seemed like it wasn't something you were
>really interested in. You stated:
>
>He rode to work for a while on a Gold Wing after that, and always
>covered his bike with a cover. Me, I just ride the bike and let it sit
>out in the sun all day while I'm inside making the money that let's me
>have stuff like that.
>
>This gave the impression that you don't mind having the bike sit uncovered
>throughout the day and that even if this was detrimental, you make enough
>money to simply buy another bike. It didn't sound like you were overly
>concerned with protecting the bike, so why would you go to the trouble to
>cover it. Additionally you yourself said it would be "trouble" to do,
>indicating to me that you weren't likely to stick with it even if you start
>carrying it.
>
>You asked my opinion and I gave it, I didn't think I could have made it any
>clearer that answering your question with "no" so I'm not sure what you
>missed. If someone else had asked saying that they had a chance to get a
>free cover and if it would help protect their bike, something they scrimpted
>and saved for and wanted to keep in the best possible condition then my
>answer might have been different, but based on your wording, in your case,
>no.
Ah. I see now. Thanks for 'splainin' it to me.
Shirleeeeeeee.............
--
_____ _____
| ____| |__ / Larry from St. Louis, MO
| _| / / SENS, MAMBM, MISFIT, TOMKAT
| |___ / /_ BS #269 DOF #(I forget)
|_____| /____| 105th Anniversary Edition Ultra