Re: Jake ZemkeOn 2008-03-14 10:40:35 -0400, RealMart <RedLegMedia@googlemail,com > said:
> On Mar 14, 1:32Êpm, T3 <no...@nowhere,net > wrote:
>
>> then goes out and runs a perfect a 200 as it gets...
>
> I know it's not his personal fault, but let's get this straight; he
> didn't run a "perfect 200".
>
> His team tinkered with the crank in his bike. I can't see them doing
> that for no reason whatsoever, so it presumably either gave some top
> end power advantage or increased reliability or something.
>
> Could he have run at the same pace for the full race on a "legal"
> crank?
>
> I doubt any of us will ever know.
>
> But I wouldn't describe a race won on a bike that isn't built within
> the rules as "perfect".
>
> I sympathise with Hayes, I really do, but I think disqualification was
> the right thing to do.
If Erion did what they say of course the DQ was justified, but I
thought it was pretty clear I was referring to Hayes's actual 200 ride
last Saturday, which, while about as flawless as possible in execution,
ended up about as far from perfect as it gets...