Re: How many miles can I expect out of my low mileage RZ-350On Aug 29, 1:55 pm, chateau.murray.takethis...@dsl.pipex,com (The
Older Gentleman) wrote:
> Bob Nixon <bigrex2...@yahoo,com > wrote:
> > Simple question for you old two smoke heads: How many miles/years @
> > roughly 5000
> > miles per year can I expect out of my low mileage (bought with 5700
> > miles
> > and had the top end rebuilt shortly there after). I know the top end
> > goes out
> > at about two or three times the rate of the needle, roller and ball
> > bearing low end
> > which I figure might go as much as much as 40K miles. I'm past the
> > "babying
> > it" stage with freeway average speeds around 75-90 and the tach gets
> > pushed
> > close to redline quite a bit in the canyon. I usually get it up past
> > 100 in
> > spurts on the weekend too.
>
> Tricky one, because you don't say which model you have. Power-valve or
> early non power-valve?
>
> The later YPVS models had stronger cranks. That said, my 1988 F2 model
> ate its mains at 14k miles. I had the crank rebuilt, ran it for another
> year or two, sold it with 22k miles up, and the crank let go (again) 300
> miles later. OTOH, a friend has a 1987 N model, which he's had from new,
> and it's done 30k and the engine as *never* been apart. Not even rings.
It is a YPVS 1984 model. The right cylinder cracked (top ring broke
off the piston top) on a HS 125MPH speed run shortly after I bought it
and was stupid enough to limp it home 25 miles on the freeway AT WOT
@~70 MPH.
It cost my a bundle to fix with two new cylinders, piston/ring.wrist
pins and port/head cleanup at LA Sleeve but it runs great now & still
pulls 125 on my portable GPS unit. The power valve works great
supplying "steady throttle" power down to 3K RPM but bucks a bit when
I nail the throttle down that low in sixth. The Canadian pipes are
tuned to about 9.5K RPM provide a vitual rev limiter above 10K.
> I think I was unlucky. I always ran it on fully synthetic oil, and ran
> it in carefully. That said, I regularly used to redline it in top (which
> was an indicated 127mph, IIRC). I even geared it up slightly, but that
> moved the irritating 'dead zone', when the power-valve couldn't decide
> whether to open or not, from 70-75mph to bang on 80, which made it a
> PITA. So I put it back to stock gearing.
I run full synthetic (ester based) T2 in the engine and changed to
synthetic in the X-mission.
> If it needed a top end rebuild so soon, some dork has probably
broken
> something.
Other than the throttles being way out of sync we saw nothing. Maybe
just 23 years of rust on the stock antifreeze caused cylinder crack in
PA where I bought the bike. I also changes to Engine ICE=propylene
gycol at the top enfd bebuild as AZ summer can be brutally hot.
> Fundamentally, it's a remarkably strong design - one of the Brit
> magazines featured some guy who'd done over 100k miles on one! The
> average.
40K sound good to me:)
> Pistons - the recommended set-up when I had mine was to use pattern
> pistons, but always to use OE rings. Oh, and OE head gaskets, too.
>
> Just ride and enjoy. If/when it goes pop, it's a stroker - it's not the
> hardest thing to pull apart and fix.
>
> Oh, if yours is a power-valve model, the endemic problem is premature
> wear of the power-valve shaft in the front of the barrels, as it cops
> all the road crap. This is expensive, as the barrles need re-bushing.
> Apparently, a mudguard extension (fender extender, to you) increases the
> life by an order of magnitude.
I've heard the power valves can be problematic. Thanks for your input.
> --
> BMW K1100LT 750SS CB400F CD250 CB125 SL125
> GAGARPHOF#30 GHPOTHUF#1 BOTAFOT#60 ANORAK#06 YTC#3
> BOF#30 WUSS#5 The bells, the bells.....- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -