Re: Euro diesel reaches the USOn 12 Feb, 11:00, "." <Rhiann...@gmail . com > wrote:
> On Feb 11, 11:21=EF=BF=BDpm, totallydeadmail...@yahoo.co.uk (The Older
>
> Gentleman) wrote:
> > Why? Face up: the US must realise that the era of cheap energy is over,
> > and that if you want to conserve supplies and reduce CO2 emissions, the
> > best way (for vehicles) is to tax heavy use.
>
> > That promotes (a) the building of more efficient vehicles and (b) less
> > vehicle use anyway.
>
> So. Apparently your position is that the wasteful use of energy is a
> sin, so we should all tax this sin so heavily that the majority of
> drivers cannot afford to fuel their vehicles.
>
You're not really that bright, are you? It can be argued that all
waste is sinful, but I won't. I'll just say that the rest of the world
(except you) seems to agree that we must cut emissions and the
squandering of non-renewable energy sources. As for "the majority of
drivers cannot afford to fuel their vehicles" - this is nonsense, even
for you.
You see, if you buy more economical vehicles, guess what happens?
Yes!! You buy less fuel. The price of fuel doubles, but you now drive
a car that does 40mpg instead of 20mpg and... Well, you do the maths.
How much more are you paying?
> But *you* should be able to continue to drive *your* vehicle, because
> you're somehow
> "worthy" of such a priviliege.
>
> Isn't that about it, in a nutshell?
No. I am doing what I can to reduce my vehicle use. I sold a fuel-
guzzling Saab and bought an economical diesel car. I use a small 125
for running around London instead of a bigger bike. I don't actually
object to fuel taxation.
>
> > > State + federal tax total 62.8 cents per gallon
>
> > About 33 UK pence. Peanuts.
>
> As an American, I regard most taxes as abusive. Americans fought a
> revolutionary war over taxes, as I recall...
Oh, do grow up.
>
> But, you seem to believe that Americans should happily pay 10 times as
> much taxes on fuel as they are paying now, because the tax is fixed on
> the quantity of purchased, not upon the speculative value of crude oil
> futures and market supply and demand.
>
Read what I said above about emissions and non-renewable energy.
*This* is the issue, you idiot.
>>
> And where does that tax money come from, and where does it go, anyway?
>
> If fewer people can afford to drive, you don't need to built new
> highways or bridges.
>
> And, as less people can afford to buy cars or drive, and they start
> using public transportation or riding bicycles, what happens to the
> agencies that depend upon this
> huge fuel tax, who do they suck their blood money out of next?
They always find somebody. Don't worry.
I frequently wonder how you manage to come up with these leaps of non-
logic that you maintain are self-evident truths.