Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
AN (Anti-Newton) glass question
Re: AN (Anti-Newton) glass question
In article <13u3caaq9pavb00@corp.supernews,com >,
"Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@ix,net com,com > wrote:
> Newton's rings are an interference pattern where two
> beams of light can interfer. The usual cause is reflection
> between two reflective surfaces that are very closely
> spaced.
Does a single original beam source that is split, connote two beams? If
so my guess is that, Propagation seems to be the correct term?
--
Reality is a picture perfected and never looking back.
In article <13u3caaq9pavb00@corp.supernews,com >,
"Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@ix,net com,com > wrote:
> Newton's rings are an interference pattern where two
> beams of light can interfer. The usual cause is reflection
> between two reflective surfaces that are very closely
> spaced.
Does a single original beam source that is split, connote two beams? If
so my guess is that, Propagation seems to be the correct term?
--
Reality is a picture perfected and never looking back.
