Re: battery life in movie mode
? "ASAAR" <caught@22,com > ?????? ??? ??????
news:scck34pbjv1c8vb83fdr041gvhmtumv1eq@4ax,com ...
> On Sat, 24 May 2008 20:54:30 +0300, Tzortzakakis Dimitrios wrote:
>
>>> Have you checked your camera's manual? Most won't have this
>>> information, and while Canon also doesn't, they do usually provide
>>> "playback time" (defined as "continuous playback at 3 seconds per
>>> image"). I wouldn't expect it to be the same as the amount of time
>>> the camera can take movies, but for the A640, it's rated for an
>>> impressive 20 hours of playback time using either alkaline or NiMH
>>> AA batteries, so I'd be quite surprised if the A640 wouldn't be able
>>> to make movies far longer than 44 minutes using alkalines, or per
>>> charge using NiMH batteries. If your TZ3 isn't a real battery hog
>>> it should also be able to last more than 44 minutes per charge.
>>
>> Why not get a camcorder which is tailored for the task? I usually carry
>> both, and have made lots of videos (mini DV) from my sister's and
>> brother-in-law concerts (they are both musicians). I have a sony dcr
>> hc-32e
>> and (still) a nytech www .nytech.de
>
> Anyone that makes lots of videos (or wants better audio) should
> probably follow your advice. As my main interest is still
> photography (I probably take less than 10 minutes of video per year,
> and the camera's video quality is more than adequate) I'm much more
> likely to buy/waste money on new cameras and lenses than on
> camcorders. The last two I bought (and which haven't been used in
> many years) were from Sony and Fuji, both using 8mm tapes. :)
>
Ee, kamaimasen yo, as the japanese say, yes of course. I use both, the
camcorder and the still camera:-)
--
Tzortzakakis Dimitrios
major in electrical engineering
mechanized infantry reservist
hordad AT otenet DOT gr