Group: rec.photo.digital
Digital cameras, scanners, printers, software, PhotoCD.
Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
BLUEBIRDS LOVE THE 40D!
Re: BLUEBIRDS LOVE THE 40D!
Annika1980 wrote:
> It is true that my original re-posting of that pic carried no
> desciption or attribution.
A lying thief with a conscience? Hard to believe.
mike
Annika1980 wrote:
> It is true that my original re-posting of that pic carried no
> desciption or attribution.
A lying thief with a conscience? Hard to believe.
mike
Re: BLUEBIRDS LOVE THE 40D!
"m II" <c@in.the.hat> wrote in message news:aVETj.530$Yp.92@edtnps92...
> Atheist Chaplain wrote:
>
>> so please point out the stolen pictures.
>
>
> http :// www .dropshots,com /echo4#date/2006-12-23/16:36:28
>
> This is my picture. The slime ball downloaded it, lightened the manger
> scene area, then he put it on *his* web page as his own work.
>
> When I called him on it, he got abusive. A few days later he must have
> gotten sick of the bad publicity and he took it down.
>
> If I hadn't said anything in these groups, he'd still be claiming it as
> his own.
>
> I hate thieves.
>
>
>
> mike
OK then :-)
from reading the links provided by Brett I can see why your pissed at Brett,
maybe its time to get over it though, I expect getting an apology out of
Brett is probably as hard as getting Douggie to admit he was wrong.
--
"Calling Atheism a religion is like calling bald a hair color."
Don Hirschberg
"m II" <c@in.the.hat> wrote in message news:aVETj.530$Yp.92@edtnps92...
> Atheist Chaplain wrote:
>
>> so please point out the stolen pictures.
>
>
> http :// www .dropshots,com /echo4#date/2006-12-23/16:36:28
>
> This is my picture. The slime ball downloaded it, lightened the manger
> scene area, then he put it on *his* web page as his own work.
>
> When I called him on it, he got abusive. A few days later he must have
> gotten sick of the bad publicity and he took it down.
>
> If I hadn't said anything in these groups, he'd still be claiming it as
> his own.
>
> I hate thieves.
>
>
>
> mike
OK then :-)
from reading the links provided by Brett I can see why your pissed at Brett,
maybe its time to get over it though, I expect getting an apology out of
Brett is probably as hard as getting Douggie to admit he was wrong.
--
"Calling Atheism a religion is like calling bald a hair color."
Don Hirschberg
Re: BLUEBIRDS LOVE THE 40D!
Atheist Chaplain wrote:
> OK then :-)
> from reading the links provided by Brett I can see why your pissed at Brett,
> maybe its time to get over it though, I expect getting an apology out of
> Brett is probably as hard as getting Douggie to admit he was wrong.
>
You should have seen how he attributed the shot. He named it "Some
asshole". it was so inappropriate for a festive Manger scene that it
prompted Greg Campbell to comment on Anuska's class.
mike
Atheist Chaplain wrote:
> OK then :-)
> from reading the links provided by Brett I can see why your pissed at Brett,
> maybe its time to get over it though, I expect getting an apology out of
> Brett is probably as hard as getting Douggie to admit he was wrong.
>
You should have seen how he attributed the shot. He named it "Some
asshole". it was so inappropriate for a festive Manger scene that it
prompted Greg Campbell to comment on Anuska's class.
mike
Re: BLUEBIRDS LOVE THE 40D!
"m II" <c@in.the.hat> wrote in message news:h8OTj.695$Yp.192@edtnps92...
> Atheist Chaplain wrote:
>
>> OK then :-)
>> from reading the links provided by Brett I can see why your pissed at
>> Brett,
>> maybe its time to get over it though, I expect getting an apology out of
>> Brett is probably as hard as getting Douggie to admit he was wrong.
>>
>
> You should have seen how he attributed the shot. He named it "Some
> asshole". it was so inappropriate for a festive Manger scene that it
> prompted Greg Campbell to comment on Anuska's class.
>
>
>
>
> mike
>
ouch!
--
"Calling Atheism a religion is like calling bald a hair color."
Don Hirschberg
"m II" <c@in.the.hat> wrote in message news:h8OTj.695$Yp.192@edtnps92...
> Atheist Chaplain wrote:
>
>> OK then :-)
>> from reading the links provided by Brett I can see why your pissed at
>> Brett,
>> maybe its time to get over it though, I expect getting an apology out of
>> Brett is probably as hard as getting Douggie to admit he was wrong.
>>
>
> You should have seen how he attributed the shot. He named it "Some
> asshole". it was so inappropriate for a festive Manger scene that it
> prompted Greg Campbell to comment on Anuska's class.
>
>
>
>
> mike
>
ouch!
--
"Calling Atheism a religion is like calling bald a hair color."
Don Hirschberg
Re: BLUEBIRDS LOVE THE 40D!
On May 5, 9:04 pm, m II <c...@in.the.hat> wrote:
>
> You should have seen how he attributed the shot. He named it "Some
> asshole". it was so inappropriate for a festive Manger scene that it
> prompted Greg Campbell to comment on Anuska's class.
>
> mike
WAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH !!!!!
Who the fuck is Greg Campbell?
And why would you expect me to be civil when you go around calling me
names? Like I said, "Don't start none, won't be none."
But if you start with me, you get what you get.
On May 5, 9:04 pm, m II <c...@in.the.hat> wrote:
>
> You should have seen how he attributed the shot. He named it "Some
> asshole". it was so inappropriate for a festive Manger scene that it
> prompted Greg Campbell to comment on Anuska's class.
>
> mike
WAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH !!!!!
Who the fuck is Greg Campbell?
And why would you expect me to be civil when you go around calling me
names? Like I said, "Don't start none, won't be none."
But if you start with me, you get what you get.
Re: BLUEBIRDS LOVE THE 40D!
Annika1980 wrote:
> But if you start with me, you get what you get.
Coming from a lying thief, that's quite a threat.
mike
Annika1980 wrote:
> But if you start with me, you get what you get.
Coming from a lying thief, that's quite a threat.
mike
Re: BLUEBIRDS LOVE THE 40D!
Mike, enough already, you have made your point now you are as bad as noons.
Sent Bret emails take him to court pull the discussion off line.
w..
.
m II wrote:
> Annika1980 wrote:
>
> > But if you start with me, you get what you get.
>
> Coming from a lying thief, that's quite a threat.
>
> mike
Mike, enough already, you have made your point now you are as bad as noons.
Sent Bret emails take him to court pull the discussion off line.
w..
.
m II wrote:
> Annika1980 wrote:
>
> > But if you start with me, you get what you get.
>
> Coming from a lying thief, that's quite a threat.
>
> mike
Re: BLUEBIRDS LOVE THE 40D!
On May 6, 7:14 am, Walter Banks <wal...@bytecraft,com > wrote:
> Mike, enough already, you have made your point now you are as bad as noons.
> Sent Bret emails take him to court pull the discussion off line.
>
> w..
>
> .m II wrote:
> > Annika1980 wrote:
>
> > > But if you start with me, you get what you get.
>
> > Coming from a lying thief, that's quite a threat.
>
> > mike
I think there is more to it than Mike would even admit to himself.
The fact is that Bret cleaned up a pic to help the guy out. It was
suppose to be a nativity/manger scene. Nothing remotely resembling
that could be seen in the original pic because it suffered with
technical errors. When Bret pointed this out by improving and fixing
the pic up, Mike couldn't accept the fact that he took an awful pic.
Mike's ego/pride was hurt, and it's because of this he uses "he stole
my image" theory to justify his attacks on Bret. It was only after
Mike's attacks that Bret retaliated.
Until Mike accepts this fact and moves on, it will continue to eat
away at him. Mike, everyone takes a bad pic now and then. Get over
it and move on. Sadly, I don't think he will and as a result I'll be
on his hit list as well.
Helen
On May 6, 7:14 am, Walter Banks <wal...@bytecraft,com > wrote:
> Mike, enough already, you have made your point now you are as bad as noons.
> Sent Bret emails take him to court pull the discussion off line.
>
> w..
>
> .m II wrote:
> > Annika1980 wrote:
>
> > > But if you start with me, you get what you get.
>
> > Coming from a lying thief, that's quite a threat.
>
> > mike
I think there is more to it than Mike would even admit to himself.
The fact is that Bret cleaned up a pic to help the guy out. It was
suppose to be a nativity/manger scene. Nothing remotely resembling
that could be seen in the original pic because it suffered with
technical errors. When Bret pointed this out by improving and fixing
the pic up, Mike couldn't accept the fact that he took an awful pic.
Mike's ego/pride was hurt, and it's because of this he uses "he stole
my image" theory to justify his attacks on Bret. It was only after
Mike's attacks that Bret retaliated.
Until Mike accepts this fact and moves on, it will continue to eat
away at him. Mike, everyone takes a bad pic now and then. Get over
it and move on. Sadly, I don't think he will and as a result I'll be
on his hit list as well.
Helen
Re: BLUEBIRDS LOVE THE 40D!
Walter Banks wrote:
> Mike, enough already, you have made your point now you are as bad as noons.
> Sent Bret emails take him to court pull the discussion off line.
The problem isn't mine alone. How many others have had the same thing
happen to them? If everyone forgets about it, the practice continues.
When considering the culprit's portfolio, this must be kept in mind. How
many of those pictures are actually his? Once you're caught with your
hand in the cookie jar, it's hard to plead innocence the following times.
Let's not even mention the time Anuska made pornography out of someone
else's work in a failed attempt to discredit the artist.
mike
Walter Banks wrote:
> Mike, enough already, you have made your point now you are as bad as noons.
> Sent Bret emails take him to court pull the discussion off line.
The problem isn't mine alone. How many others have had the same thing
happen to them? If everyone forgets about it, the practice continues.
When considering the culprit's portfolio, this must be kept in mind. How
many of those pictures are actually his? Once you're caught with your
hand in the cookie jar, it's hard to plead innocence the following times.
Let's not even mention the time Anuska made pornography out of someone
else's work in a failed attempt to discredit the artist.
mike
Re: BLUEBIRDS LOVE THE 40D!
On 5/6/08 7:17 PM, in article cy6Uj.908$Yp.459@edtnps92, "m II"
<c@in.the.hat> wrote:
> Walter Banks wrote:
>
>> Mike, enough already, you have made your point now you are as bad as noons.
>> Sent Bret emails take him to court pull the discussion off line.
>
>
> The problem isn't mine alone. How many others have had the same thing
> happen to them? If everyone forgets about it, the practice continues.
>
> When considering the culprit's portfolio, this must be kept in mind. How
> many of those pictures are actually his? Once you're caught with your
> hand in the cookie jar, it's hard to plead innocence the following times.
>
> Let's not even mention the time Anuska made pornography out of someone
> else's work in a failed attempt to discredit the artist.
>
>
>
> mike
Stop being such an Asshole.
On 5/6/08 7:17 PM, in article cy6Uj.908$Yp.459@edtnps92, "m II"
<c@in.the.hat> wrote:
> Walter Banks wrote:
>
>> Mike, enough already, you have made your point now you are as bad as noons.
>> Sent Bret emails take him to court pull the discussion off line.
>
>
> The problem isn't mine alone. How many others have had the same thing
> happen to them? If everyone forgets about it, the practice continues.
>
> When considering the culprit's portfolio, this must be kept in mind. How
> many of those pictures are actually his? Once you're caught with your
> hand in the cookie jar, it's hard to plead innocence the following times.
>
> Let's not even mention the time Anuska made pornography out of someone
> else's work in a failed attempt to discredit the artist.
>
>
>
> mike
Stop being such an Asshole.
Re: BLUEBIRDS LOVE THE 40D!
"m II" <c@in.the.hat> wrote in message news:cy6Uj.908$Yp.459@edtnps92...
> Walter Banks wrote:
>
>> Mike, enough already, you have made your point now you are as bad as noons.
>> Sent Bret emails take him to court pull the discussion off line.
>
>
> The problem isn't mine alone. How many others have had the same thing
> happen to them? If everyone forgets about it, the practice continues.
>
> When considering the culprit's portfolio, this must be kept in mind. How
> many of those pictures are actually his?
The good ones are his, the shitty ones are stolen.; ) Bret is a far better
photographer than those who accuse him of stealing their photos. He has no
need to steal photos from anyone.
Once you're caught with your
> hand in the cookie jar, it's hard to plead innocence the following times.
>
> Let's not even mention the time Anuska made pornography out of someone
> else's work in a failed attempt to discredit the artist.
>
>
>
> mike
"m II" <c@in.the.hat> wrote in message news:cy6Uj.908$Yp.459@edtnps92...
> Walter Banks wrote:
>
>> Mike, enough already, you have made your point now you are as bad as noons.
>> Sent Bret emails take him to court pull the discussion off line.
>
>
> The problem isn't mine alone. How many others have had the same thing
> happen to them? If everyone forgets about it, the practice continues.
>
> When considering the culprit's portfolio, this must be kept in mind. How
> many of those pictures are actually his?
The good ones are his, the shitty ones are stolen.; ) Bret is a far better
photographer than those who accuse him of stealing their photos. He has no
need to steal photos from anyone.
Once you're caught with your
> hand in the cookie jar, it's hard to plead innocence the following times.
>
> Let's not even mention the time Anuska made pornography out of someone
> else's work in a failed attempt to discredit the artist.
>
>
>
> mike
Re: BLUEBIRDS LOVE THE 40D!
On May 6, 10:38 pm, "XxYyZz" <XxY...@nospam,com > wrote:
> "m II" <c...@in.the.hat> wrote in messagenews:cy6Uj.908$Yp.459@edtnps92...
>> How many of those pictures are actually his?
>
> The good ones are his, the shitty ones are stolen.; ) Bret is a far better
> photographer than those who accuse him of stealing their photos. He has no
> need to steal photos from anyone.
>
ROFL!
m II, you just got punked!
On May 6, 10:38 pm, "XxYyZz" <XxY...@nospam,com > wrote:
> "m II" <c...@in.the.hat> wrote in messagenews:cy6Uj.908$Yp.459@edtnps92...
>> How many of those pictures are actually his?
>
> The good ones are his, the shitty ones are stolen.; ) Bret is a far better
> photographer than those who accuse him of stealing their photos. He has no
> need to steal photos from anyone.
>
ROFL!
m II, you just got punked!
Re: BLUEBIRDS LOVE THE 40D!
Annika1980 wrote:
> ROFL!
>
> m II, you just got punked!
If you say so.
In the mean time, you are still a thief and liar.
mike
Annika1980 wrote:
> ROFL!
>
> m II, you just got punked!
If you say so.
In the mean time, you are still a thief and liar.
mike
Re: BLUEBIRDS LOVE THE 40D!
On May 7, 2:34 pm, m II <c...@in.the.hat> wrote:
> Annika1980 wrote:
> > ROFL!
>
> > m II, you just got punked!
>
> If you say so.
>
> In the mean time, you are still a thief and liar.
>
> mike
And you are a semi-anonymous D-Mac clone. Perhaps you should create a
website detailing the whole incident and how you were abused? Then
sit back, relax, and pop open a 6-pack of GETTHEFUCKOVERIT.
BTW, what have I stolen from you or lied about? I never claimed your
pic as mine as you claimed. I would never claim ownership of such a
poor shot.
On May 7, 2:34 pm, m II <c...@in.the.hat> wrote:
> Annika1980 wrote:
> > ROFL!
>
> > m II, you just got punked!
>
> If you say so.
>
> In the mean time, you are still a thief and liar.
>
> mike
And you are a semi-anonymous D-Mac clone. Perhaps you should create a
website detailing the whole incident and how you were abused? Then
sit back, relax, and pop open a 6-pack of GETTHEFUCKOVERIT.
BTW, what have I stolen from you or lied about? I never claimed your
pic as mine as you claimed. I would never claim ownership of such a
poor shot.
Re: BLUEBIRDS LOVE THE 40D!
On May 4, 10:24 pm, m II <c...@in.the.hat> wrote:
> > The proof is there for all to see.
>
> > He has an impressive amount of portfolios, and his work has been
> > viewed by one million, 8 hundred thousand viewers, unless, he ran
> > those numbers up himself ( I doubt it ).
>
> The point is somewhat moot.
>
> If Mother Theresa were a plagiarist would we think differently about her
> work with the poor? Then again, would that work make her any less of a
> plagiarist?
>
> Apples and oranges or, in this case, photographer and thief.
>
> mike
People give Helen lotsa grief for the endless praise she heaps on my
photos. So if we take Helen's comments out of it and take away my
four pet stalkers with grudges (m2, Rita, Noons, D-Mac), we are left
with a pretty good sampling of mostly unbiased comments. Most of my
photos have been commented on favorably by the masses.
I'm happy with that. But regardless of the comments I'll keep posting
photos for as long as I feel like sharing them.
On May 4, 10:24 pm, m II <c...@in.the.hat> wrote:
> > The proof is there for all to see.
>
> > He has an impressive amount of portfolios, and his work has been
> > viewed by one million, 8 hundred thousand viewers, unless, he ran
> > those numbers up himself ( I doubt it ).
>
> The point is somewhat moot.
>
> If Mother Theresa were a plagiarist would we think differently about her
> work with the poor? Then again, would that work make her any less of a
> plagiarist?
>
> Apples and oranges or, in this case, photographer and thief.
>
> mike
People give Helen lotsa grief for the endless praise she heaps on my
photos. So if we take Helen's comments out of it and take away my
four pet stalkers with grudges (m2, Rita, Noons, D-Mac), we are left
with a pretty good sampling of mostly unbiased comments. Most of my
photos have been commented on favorably by the masses.
I'm happy with that. But regardless of the comments I'll keep posting
photos for as long as I feel like sharing them.
Next: CHINA WHOLESALE CHEAP PRADA SUNGLASSES
Previous: Never Lay Out In The Sun With Your Mouth Open!!
