Group: rec.photo.equipment.medium-format

Medium format cameras and lenses

Add group to favorites Add group to favorites
   indietro Back to post list     indietro Send new message to group
Search:

Post Subject:

Pentax 67 extension tubes

Reply from: Robert Feinman
Date: 29 Jul 2007, 19:17
Pentax 67 extension tubes

Would someone please explain how the extension tubes for the Pentax 67
work?
Do they allow for automatic diaphragm stopping down for example or is it
necessary to set the lens to manual mode?
So far I've only used close up lenses for the occasional "macro" shot,
but this suffers from the usual sharpness problems.

Thanks..
--
Robert D Feinman - Landscapes, Panoramas, Photo Tips
Web Site: http :// robertdfeinman,com

Reply from: David J. Littleboy
Date: 29 Jul 2007, 19:56
Re: Pentax 67 extension tubes


"Robert Feinman" <robert.feinman@gmail,com > wrote in message
news:MPG.2116959fc4bdc849989a11@news.acedsl,com ...
> Would someone please explain how the extension tubes for the Pentax 67
> work?
> Do they allow for automatic diaphragm stopping down for example or is it
> necessary to set the lens to manual mode?
> So far I've only used close up lenses for the occasional "macro" shot,
> but this suffers from the usual sharpness problems.

At least on all my Mamiya 645 lenses, closeup lenses work superbly. As they
do on my 5D.

I suspect you are having mirror slap or other problems. (Or are you doing
stamps, paper money or other things that require a flat field and no
distortion?)

Extension tubes aren't optimal either, since most lenses aren't optimized
for closeup work. (There's an article on Bob M's MF site that finds closeup
lenses better than extension tubes some of the time.)

David J. Littleboy
Tokyo, Japan



Reply from: Duncan
Date: 30 Jul 2007, 08:13
Re: Pentax 67 extension tubes

I agree that a micro/macro lens is far superior since they were designed for
this in mind. I use tubes manly to reduce the minimum focusing distance
rather than fro what they were touted for as macro work.

What I have used successfully are enlarging lenses, manually on bellows with
appropriate mount adaptors as a work around. But either way the macro lenses
are not cheap and the adaptors aren't either. I have them as my systems have
built up over the years and so a simple matter for me to choose what I need
from the kit available.

So in your case you need to justify the cost over results and or if relevant
the return from a job/commission that you are shooting for.

Duncan


"David J. Littleboy" <davidjl@gol,com > wrote in message
news:f8ikd7$8hc$1@nnrp.gol,com ...
>
> "Robert Feinman" <robert.feinman@gmail,com > wrote in message
> news:MPG.2116959fc4bdc849989a11@news.acedsl,com ...
>> Would someone please explain how the extension tubes for the Pentax 67
>> work?
>> Do they allow for automatic diaphragm stopping down for example or is it
>> necessary to set the lens to manual mode?
>> So far I've only used close up lenses for the occasional "macro" shot,
>> but this suffers from the usual sharpness problems.
>
> At least on all my Mamiya 645 lenses, closeup lenses work superbly. As
> they do on my 5D.
>
> I suspect you are having mirror slap or other problems. (Or are you doing
> stamps, paper money or other things that require a flat field and no
> distortion?)
>
> Extension tubes aren't optimal either, since most lenses aren't optimized
> for closeup work. (There's an article on Bob M's MF site that finds
> closeup lenses better than extension tubes some of the time.)
>
> David J. Littleboy
> Tokyo, Japan
>
>



Reply from: Randy Stewart
Date: 29 Jul 2007, 20:33
Re: Pentax 67 extension tubes


"Robert Feinman" <robert.feinman@gmail,com > wrote in message
news:MPG.2116959fc4bdc849989a11@news.acedsl,com ...
> Would someone please explain how the extension tubes for the Pentax 67
> work?
> Do they allow for automatic diaphragm stopping down for example or is it
> necessary to set the lens to manual mode?
> So far I've only used close up lenses for the occasional "macro" shot,
> but this suffers from the usual sharpness problems.
>
> Thanks..
> --
> Robert D Feinman - Landscapes, Panoramas, Photo Tips
> Web Site: http :// robertdfeinman,com

The Pentax extension tubes, used a single units or in combination, mount to
the inner bayonet mount of the body and do couple the automatic diaphram.

To clarify the possible confusion in an earlier reply, I assume that by
"close up lens", you are mean a close-up diopter lens mounted like a filter
to the front of a standard lens, not a true macro lens such as the 135mm
marco lens for this system. Pentax does/did make a couple of two element
diopter lenses of that type, but they must be matched to a specific group of
regular lenses and used at reduced aperatures, or image quality will suffer.

Randall Stewart



Reply from: Lake
Date: 02 Aug 2007, 00:12
Re: Pentax 67 extension tubes

In article <13apnbnprvqh310@corp.supernews,com >, Randy Stewart
<rand@pacifier,com > wrote:

>
> The Pentax extension tubes, used a single units or in combination, mount to
> the inner bayonet mount of the body and do couple the automatic diaphram.

<snip>

Pentax also has a set of outer-mount extension rings for those lenses
(400mm and up, with exceptions) that mount to the outer bayonet mount
of the camera. They require manual aperature operation.

Pentax also makes an (inner mount) helical extension ring that gives
you variable magnification within the range of the tube.



Next: Contax 645

Previous:  Mamiya 645 AF



Login:
  Username:    Password: 
 
   Lost Password? click here!
Thread: