Re: Best option for large film processing order?On 2007-03-29 17:35:25 -0400, "jeremy" <jeremy@nospam . com > said:
>
> "Pete" <masspete@my-deja . com > wrote in message
> news:1175187095.855060.215880@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups . com ...
>> Not so long ago I had an SLR and was shooting film faster than I could
>> keep up with having it processed, then said SLR was stolen, and I went
>> digital for reasons of logistics and economics. I still have,
>> however, a sizable amount of film I need processed/printed (literally
>> dozens of rolls).
>>
>> What would be the best option for handling these? I'd like to have
>> them processed by someone who's going to do a halfway decent job, but
>> considering the volume I'd like to keep the cost reasonable.
>>
>> The film is all run-of-the-mill 35mm, no unusual processes. I'd
>> pretty much like two sets of matte prints from each. I don't need
>> digital scans (unless they're really cheap or free) because the
>> quality I get from lab scans is never all that good anyway.
>>
>> Are Snapfish or York reliable enough to send it out to? Their prices
>> are very good.
>>
>> Or, alternatively, is it possible to go straight to Qualex or someone
>> with a very large order and get a better price?
>>
>> Any other reasonable choices? I'm in the Boston area, if that matters.
>>
>
> BJ's Wholesale Club uses Qualex. 24-exp and 5 x 7 prints are $3.99. Costco
> used to use Qualex but I seem to recall that they recently dropped film
> processing. Not sure of this.
Snapfish is OK.
m