HELLO Hello hello

What happened to this group? It used to be so interesting and useful. I
can't imagine that digital has killed nature photography? (For some people,
I guess that's true, because now they don't have to get it right in the
field: They just fake it with Photoshop.)


--
- Alan Justice

"Alan Justice" <spam@spamspamspam.spam> wrote in message
news:13tqjpvi9g9s912@corp.supernews.com...
> What happened to this group? It used to be so interesting and useful. I
> can't imagine that digital has killed nature photography? (For some
> people,
> I guess that's true, because now they don't have to get it right in the
> field: They just fake it with Photoshop.)
>
>
> --
> - Alan Justice
>
>

I tend to shoot more people than nature, but my wife does the opposite.
She's not into NGs, so I keep an eye on this group for her.

She shoots digital, and photoshops very little. I think "natural" shots
should be just that -- "natural."

But, I suppose, a bit of tinkering can enhance the enjoyment without
idealizing the image to the point where it no longer resembles the real
world.

Take Care,
Dudley

Well, I see the problem now. I have Earthlink, and whether it was their
fault or not, I have had no messages available from this NG. I assumed that
there just wasn't anyone posting. So I tried again, and all of a sudden
their are hundreds of messages, going back to Sept. 2006. Guess I have some
catching up to do.

--
- Alan Justice

"Alan Justice" <spam@spamspamspam.spam> wrote in message
news:13tqjpvi9g9s912@corp.supernews.com...
> What happened to this group? It used to be so interesting and useful. I
> can't imagine that digital has killed nature photography? (For some
people,
> I guess that's true, because now they don't have to get it right in the
> field: They just fake it with Photoshop.)
>
>
> --
> - Alan Justice
>
>