Warning (for Gisele) Contains anti-liberal material

Re: Warning (for Gisele) Contains anti-liberal material

I have a friend in Alabama and in the ritzy area she lives it most certainly
still is. In doctor's offices where she used to work, it most certainly did.

--
Sue -- Firefighter mom -- still rabid UW DAWG fan!
"Jeannie" <jwilson421@comcastspamkills,net > wrote in message
news:Xns9A72CCAD5E7CEjwilson421comcastnet@216.196.97.136...
> Donna <donna@exitstageleftcroakerwoods,com > wrote in
> news:Xns9A729E38F3B3Adonnacroakerwoodscom@69.28.186.120:
>
>>> Black people were denied entrances to bathrooms, and restaurants and
>>>> stores and in some places still are.
>>>
>>> Can you provide documentation of where black people are denied
>>> entrances to bathrooms, restaurants, stores, etc.?
>>>
>>
>> Are or were? I know for a fact about several "weres" in my town from the
>> late 50s/early to mid 60s.
>
> She said..."and in some places still are", which is what I was asking
> about. I know that used to happen but am wondering where it is still
> happening.

-- deleted messages --

-- deleted messages --

Re: Warning (for Gisele) Contains anti-liberal material

I don't think "he" is racist, or at least I cannot even venture a
guess about that, and I assume he wouldn't be due to his heritage, but
I was more referring to what his pastor was spewing as he sits
listening. Before becoming a candidate, he still sat there as a
senator, no? What about the "you are the company you keep" "lay with
dogs--flees", etc.? lol. I didn't think what I went through was
horrible, scary, but it has offered me food for thought on many
occasions as I think back on it when I hear people refer solely to
white discrimination against blacks in the general sense because that
has not been MY experience.



On Mar 31, 7:01=EF=BF=BDpm, "Sue" <medlawtr...@comcast,net > wrote:
> Yes, I looked it up there was. But I think there was another incident year=
s
> ago in Chicago that I can't find. You are correct. There is hate in all
> races. It never makes it right. I do not believe Obama is one of them by a=
ny
> means. How could he? He is a little bit of a bunch of different races and =
to
> hate any would be to hate part of his children's heritage. I think what yo=
u
> went through was horrible. My friend had a similar incident (not as severe=

> by any means) in that she took the BART to an area in San Francisco and NO=

> ONE at any store (Burger King, McDonalds) spoke English and could tell her=

> where she was or what to do and where to go. She was in a panic (in her ow=
n
> country as she tells it). This was about 20 years ago. She is still rantin=
g
> and pissed about that.
>

Re: Warning (for Gisele) Contains anti-liberal material

On Mar 31, 10:29=C2=A0pm, Chris <chrissype...@aol,com > wrote:
> I don't think "he" is racist, or at least I cannot even venture a
> guess about that, and I assume he wouldn't be due to his heritage, but
> I was more referring to what his pastor was spewing as he sits
> listening. Before becoming a candidate, he still sat there as a
> senator, no? What about the "you are the company you keep" "lay with
> dogs--flees", etc.? lol. I didn't think what I went through was
> horrible, scary, but it has offered me food for thought on many
> occasions as I think back on it when I hear people refer solely to
> white discrimination against blacks in the general sense because that
> has not been MY experience.
>
> On Mar 31, 7:01=EF=BF=BDpm, "Sue" <medlawtr...@comcast,net > wrote:
>
>
>
> > Yes, I looked it up there was. But I think there was another incident ye=
ars
> > ago in Chicago that I can't find. You are correct. There is hate in all
> > races. It never makes it right. I do not believe Obama is one of them by=
any
> > means. How could he? He is a little bit of a bunch of different races an=
d to
> > hate any would be to hate part of his children's heritage. I think what =
you
> > went through was horrible. My friend had a similar incident (not as seve=
re
> > by any means) in that she took the BART to an area in San Francisco and =
NO
> > ONE at any store (Burger King, McDonalds) spoke English and could tell h=
er
> > where she was or what to do and where to go. She was in a panic (in her =
own
> > country as she tells it). This was about 20 years ago. She is still rant=
ing
> > and pissed about that.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Just this March on the way back from Florida - we stopped in Georgia
at a Taco Bell and I took Claire in to use the bathroom. I walked up
and stood in back of the line section to view the menu while she went.
Just me and 2 black workers. The one gal leaning on the drive-thru
register with her chin in her hand turned around and looked at me. I
said "Hi. Hope you don't mind that I'm looking in here at your menu
for a sec..." and she gave me a dirty-ass look, no hello back, not
even a hint of a customer-service smile. Sheesh, I can't imagine
keeping your job if you treat everyone like that, but it could have
been just that, so I can't even say it was because I was white, so I
don't say that it was. lol.

Re: Warning (for Gisele) Contains anti-liberal material

Chris wrote:

> I don't think "he" is racist, or at least I cannot even venture a
> guess about that, and I assume he wouldn't be due to his heritage, but
> I was more referring to what his pastor was spewing as he sits
> listening. Before becoming a candidate, he still sat there as a
> senator, no? What about the "you are the company you keep" "lay with
> dogs--flees", etc.? lol. I didn't think what I went through was
> horrible, scary, but it has offered me food for thought on many
> occasions as I think back on it when I hear people refer solely to
> white discrimination against blacks in the general sense because that
> has not been MY experience.
>

What bothers me most about Wright is that he is supposed to be a
minister. I know of no ministers who preach the hate that he does. He
should be ashamed.

Marsha

Re: Warning (for Gisele) Contains anti-liberal material

She was denied because the store was closed and she wanted to shop after
hours.

"Sue" <medlawtrans@comcast,net > wrote in message
news:-e-dnZJIEayLiWzanZ2dnUVZ_g2dnZ2d@comcast,com ...
> Black people were denied entrances to bathrooms, and restaurants and
> stores and in some places still are. You just happened to be experiencing
> what they experience. You are living their experience and are seeing it is
> not comfortable and is not pleasant and is horrible in your own country.
> Something they have had but on a grander, government endorsed basis for
> years (even signs "No coloreds"). Yes, it is happening still today. I
> believe it was in 2006 Oprah was denied access to a store.
>
>>

Re: Warning (for Gisele) Contains anti-liberal material

On Mar 31, 8:07=EF=BF=BDpm, "Phyllis Nilsson" <phyllisnils...@buckeye-
express,com > wrote:
> She was denied because the store was closed and she wanted to shop after
> hours.
>
> "Sue" <medlawtr...@comcast,net > wrote in message
>
> news:-e-dnZJIEayLiWzanZ2dnUVZ_g2dnZ2d@comcast,com ...
>
>
>
> > Black people were denied entrances to bathrooms, and restaurants and
> > stores and in some places still are. You just happened to be experiencin=
g
> > what they experience. You are living their experience and are seeing it =
is
> > not comfortable and is not pleasant and is horrible in your own country.=

> > Something they have had but on a grander, government endorsed basis for
> > years (even signs "No coloreds"). Yes, it is happening still today. I
> > believe it was in 2006 Oprah was denied access to a store.- Hide quoted =
text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

They said they were prepping for some sort of event they had coming up
and they apologized to her for the overzealous employee that kept her
out or something like that - she had the CEO on her show and all was
well and cleared up.

Re: Warning (for Gisele) Contains anti-liberal material

Sue wrote:

> Black people were denied entrances to bathrooms, and restaurants and stores
> and in some places still are. You just happened to be experiencing what they
> experience. You are living their experience and are seeing it is not
> comfortable and is not pleasant and is horrible in your own country.
> Something they have had but on a grander, government endorsed basis for
> years (even signs "No coloreds"). Yes, it is happening still today. I
> believe it was in 2006 Oprah was denied access to a store.
>

Please provide specific examples of current or even recent government
endorsed signs that say "No Coloreds". Once again, you're blowing BS
out your ass.

Re: Warning (for Gisele) Contains anti-liberal material

I did not mean to imply it was done recently -- jesus you can be a bitchy
pain in the ass. You know damn well, I meant from the 50s and when it was
done. No wonder this country has gone to hell with this kind of passive
aggressive CRAP-OLA!

--
Sue -- Firefighter mom -- still rabid UW DAWG fan!
"Marsha" <mas@xeb,net > wrote in message news:fsuimr$idf$8@news.datemas.de...
> Sue wrote:
>
>> Black people were denied entrances to bathrooms, and restaurants and
>> stores and in some places still are. You just happened to be experiencing
>> what they experience. You are living their experience and are seeing it
>> is not comfortable and is not pleasant and is horrible in your own
>> country. Something they have had but on a grander, government endorsed
>> basis for years (even signs "No coloreds"). Yes, it is happening still
>> today. I believe it was in 2006 Oprah was denied access to a store.
>>
>
> Please provide specific examples of current or even recent government
> endorsed signs that say "No Coloreds". Once again, you're blowing BS out
> your ass.
>

Re: Warning (for Gisele) Contains anti-liberal material

On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:40:33 -0700, "Sue" <medlawtrans@comcast,net >
wrote:

>I did not mean to imply it was done recently -- jesus you can be a bitchy
>pain in the ass. You know damn well, I meant from the 50s and when it was
>done. No wonder this country has gone to hell with this kind of passive
>aggressive CRAP-OLA!

No need for any implication that I can see - your statement is
unequivocal: "...denied entrances to bathrooms, and restaurants and
stores and in some places still are." What else could "and in some
places still are" mean? How could "and in some places still are" mean
from the 50s? Pshaw!

Bright Spark

Re: Warning (for Gisele) Contains anti-liberal material

"No coloreds allowed" clearly did!

--
Sue -- Firefighter mom -- still rabid UW DAWG fan!
<brightspark1901@hotmail,com > wrote in message
news:v6t5v3dcms5stkh4mr2ffrlqb11dla78qm@4ax,com ...
> On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:40:33 -0700, "Sue" <medlawtrans@comcast,net >
> wrote:
>
>>I did not mean to imply it was done recently -- jesus you can be a bitchy
>>pain in the ass. You know damn well, I meant from the 50s and when it was
>>done. No wonder this country has gone to hell with this kind of passive
>>aggressive CRAP-OLA!
>
> No need for any implication that I can see - your statement is
> unequivocal: "...denied entrances to bathrooms, and restaurants and
> stores and in some places still are." What else could "and in some
> places still are" mean? How could "and in some places still are" mean
> from the 50s? Pshaw!
>
> Bright Spark

Re: Warning (for Gisele) Contains anti-liberal material

brightspark1901@hotmail,com wrote in
news:v6t5v3dcms5stkh4mr2ffrlqb11dla78qm@4ax,com :

> No need for any implication that I can see - your statement is
> unequivocal: "...denied entrances to bathrooms, and restaurants and
> stores and in some places still are." What else could "and in some
> places still are" mean? How could "and in some places still are" mean
> from the 50s? Pshaw!

I believe she was referring to the "gov't endorsed no colored sign" to
being recent.

-- deleted messages --

-- deleted messages --