Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
Malpractice?
Malpractice?
If a dentist ignores a treatment plan and you consequently suffer from
teeth damaged to the point of tooth lose and or root canals is a
Malpractice suit in order?
i.e. if you have lost confidence in your dentist's abilities shouldn't
you see the dentist recommended by an attorney?
--
If Evolution is out-lawed. Only the Out-laws will evolve.
If a dentist ignores a treatment plan and you consequently suffer from
teeth damaged to the point of tooth lose and or root canals is a
Malpractice suit in order?
i.e. if you have lost confidence in your dentist's abilities shouldn't
you see the dentist recommended by an attorney?
--
If Evolution is out-lawed. Only the Out-laws will evolve.
Re: Malpractice?
your name wrote:
> If a dentist ignores a treatment plan and you consequently suffer from
> teeth damaged to the point of tooth lose and or root canals is a
> Malpractice suit in order?
> i.e. if you have lost confidence in your dentist's abilities shouldn't
> you see the dentist recommended by an attorney?
You would have to demonstrate that the dentist's action (or lack of
action) was the proximate cause of the damage. Furthermore, you would
have to demonstrate that you followed the dentists recommendations, and
that this caused the damages.
If you lose confidence in your dentist, you should see another dentist.
Going to an attorney is the last thing I'd do, not the first.
Steve
--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http :// www .dentaltwins,com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001
your name wrote:
> If a dentist ignores a treatment plan and you consequently suffer from
> teeth damaged to the point of tooth lose and or root canals is a
> Malpractice suit in order?
> i.e. if you have lost confidence in your dentist's abilities shouldn't
> you see the dentist recommended by an attorney?
You would have to demonstrate that the dentist's action (or lack of
action) was the proximate cause of the damage. Furthermore, you would
have to demonstrate that you followed the dentists recommendations, and
that this caused the damages.
If you lose confidence in your dentist, you should see another dentist.
Going to an attorney is the last thing I'd do, not the first.
Steve
--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http :// www .dentaltwins,com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001
Re: Malpractice?
In article <SVa4k.525$cm.275@trndny09>,
Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldmung@dentaltwins,com > wrote:
> your name wrote:
> > If a dentist ignores a treatment plan and you consequently suffer from
> > teeth damaged to the point of tooth lose and or root canals is a
> > Malpractice suit in order?
> > i.e. if you have lost confidence in your dentist's abilities shouldn't
> > you see the dentist recommended by an attorney?
>
>
> You would have to demonstrate that the dentist's action (or lack of
> action) was the proximate cause of the damage. Furthermore, you would
> have to demonstrate that you followed the dentists recommendations, and
> that this caused the damages.
> If you lose confidence in your dentist, you should see another dentist.
> Going to an attorney is the last thing I'd do, not the first.
>
> Steve
I'm wondering why a dentist would ignore his/her own treatment plan in
the first place.
Webby
In article <SVa4k.525$cm.275@trndny09>,
Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldmung@dentaltwins,com > wrote:
> your name wrote:
> > If a dentist ignores a treatment plan and you consequently suffer from
> > teeth damaged to the point of tooth lose and or root canals is a
> > Malpractice suit in order?
> > i.e. if you have lost confidence in your dentist's abilities shouldn't
> > you see the dentist recommended by an attorney?
>
>
> You would have to demonstrate that the dentist's action (or lack of
> action) was the proximate cause of the damage. Furthermore, you would
> have to demonstrate that you followed the dentists recommendations, and
> that this caused the damages.
> If you lose confidence in your dentist, you should see another dentist.
> Going to an attorney is the last thing I'd do, not the first.
>
> Steve
I'm wondering why a dentist would ignore his/her own treatment plan in
the first place.
Webby
Re: Malpractice?
The Webby wrote:
> In article <SVa4k.525$cm.275@trndny09>,
> Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldmung@dentaltwins,com > wrote:
>
>> your name wrote:
>>> If a dentist ignores a treatment plan and you consequently suffer from
>>> teeth damaged to the point of tooth lose and or root canals is a
>>> Malpractice suit in order?
>>> i.e. if you have lost confidence in your dentist's abilities shouldn't
>>> you see the dentist recommended by an attorney?
>>
>> You would have to demonstrate that the dentist's action (or lack of
>> action) was the proximate cause of the damage. Furthermore, you would
>> have to demonstrate that you followed the dentists recommendations, and
>> that this caused the damages.
>> If you lose confidence in your dentist, you should see another dentist.
>> Going to an attorney is the last thing I'd do, not the first.
>>
>> Steve
>
> I'm wondering why a dentist would ignore his/her own treatment plan in
> the first place.
>
> Webby
Maybe it's the patient's own treatment plan. ;-)
--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http :// www .dentaltwins,com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001
The Webby wrote:
> In article <SVa4k.525$cm.275@trndny09>,
> Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldmung@dentaltwins,com > wrote:
>
>> your name wrote:
>>> If a dentist ignores a treatment plan and you consequently suffer from
>>> teeth damaged to the point of tooth lose and or root canals is a
>>> Malpractice suit in order?
>>> i.e. if you have lost confidence in your dentist's abilities shouldn't
>>> you see the dentist recommended by an attorney?
>>
>> You would have to demonstrate that the dentist's action (or lack of
>> action) was the proximate cause of the damage. Furthermore, you would
>> have to demonstrate that you followed the dentists recommendations, and
>> that this caused the damages.
>> If you lose confidence in your dentist, you should see another dentist.
>> Going to an attorney is the last thing I'd do, not the first.
>>
>> Steve
>
> I'm wondering why a dentist would ignore his/her own treatment plan in
> the first place.
>
> Webby
Maybe it's the patient's own treatment plan. ;-)
--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http :// www .dentaltwins,com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001
Re: Malpractice?
In article <8Tb4k.528$cm.28@trndny09>,
Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldmung@dentaltwins,com > wrote:
> The Webby wrote:
> > In article <SVa4k.525$cm.275@trndny09>,
> > Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldmung@dentaltwins,com > wrote:
> >
> >> your name wrote:
> >>> If a dentist ignores a treatment plan and you consequently suffer from
> >>> teeth damaged to the point of tooth lose and or root canals is a
> >>> Malpractice suit in order?
> >>> i.e. if you have lost confidence in your dentist's abilities shouldn't
> >>> you see the dentist recommended by an attorney?
> >>
> >> You would have to demonstrate that the dentist's action (or lack of
> >> action) was the proximate cause of the damage. Furthermore, you would
> >> have to demonstrate that you followed the dentists recommendations, and
> >> that this caused the damages.
> >> If you lose confidence in your dentist, you should see another dentist.
> >> Going to an attorney is the last thing I'd do, not the first.
> >>
> >> Steve
> >
> > I'm wondering why a dentist would ignore his/her own treatment plan in
> > the first place.
> >
> > Webby
>
>
> Maybe it's the patient's own treatment plan. ;-)
well, I chose the dentist but after having been under his "care" for
more than a year, I'm disappointed.
I did get a second opinion and it seemed decay in more than one tooth has
been ignored until major work in needed.
I did complain about pain and it was labeled gum recession and Ambesol
was suggested. It was decay all along. And probable tooth loss.
we're looking at $10,000+ . Probably all preventable.
--
If Evolution is out-lawed. Only the Out-laws will evolve.
In article <8Tb4k.528$cm.28@trndny09>,
Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldmung@dentaltwins,com > wrote:
> The Webby wrote:
> > In article <SVa4k.525$cm.275@trndny09>,
> > Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldmung@dentaltwins,com > wrote:
> >
> >> your name wrote:
> >>> If a dentist ignores a treatment plan and you consequently suffer from
> >>> teeth damaged to the point of tooth lose and or root canals is a
> >>> Malpractice suit in order?
> >>> i.e. if you have lost confidence in your dentist's abilities shouldn't
> >>> you see the dentist recommended by an attorney?
> >>
> >> You would have to demonstrate that the dentist's action (or lack of
> >> action) was the proximate cause of the damage. Furthermore, you would
> >> have to demonstrate that you followed the dentists recommendations, and
> >> that this caused the damages.
> >> If you lose confidence in your dentist, you should see another dentist.
> >> Going to an attorney is the last thing I'd do, not the first.
> >>
> >> Steve
> >
> > I'm wondering why a dentist would ignore his/her own treatment plan in
> > the first place.
> >
> > Webby
>
>
> Maybe it's the patient's own treatment plan. ;-)
well, I chose the dentist but after having been under his "care" for
more than a year, I'm disappointed.
I did get a second opinion and it seemed decay in more than one tooth has
been ignored until major work in needed.
I did complain about pain and it was labeled gum recession and Ambesol
was suggested. It was decay all along. And probable tooth loss.
we're looking at $10,000+ . Probably all preventable.
--
If Evolution is out-lawed. Only the Out-laws will evolve.
Re: Malpractice?
your name wrote:
> In article <8Tb4k.528$cm.28@trndny09>,
> Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldmung@dentaltwins,com > wrote:
>
>> The Webby wrote:
>>> In article <SVa4k.525$cm.275@trndny09>,
>>> Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldmung@dentaltwins,com > wrote:
>>>
>>>> your name wrote:
>>>>> If a dentist ignores a treatment plan and you consequently suffer from
>>>>> teeth damaged to the point of tooth lose and or root canals is a
>>>>> Malpractice suit in order?
>>>>> i.e. if you have lost confidence in your dentist's abilities shouldn't
>>>>> you see the dentist recommended by an attorney?
>>>> You would have to demonstrate that the dentist's action (or lack of
>>>> action) was the proximate cause of the damage. Furthermore, you would
>>>> have to demonstrate that you followed the dentists recommendations, and
>>>> that this caused the damages.
>>>> If you lose confidence in your dentist, you should see another dentist.
>>>> Going to an attorney is the last thing I'd do, not the first.
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>> I'm wondering why a dentist would ignore his/her own treatment plan in
>>> the first place.
>>>
>>> Webby
>>
>> Maybe it's the patient's own treatment plan. ;-)
>
> well, I chose the dentist but after having been under his "care" for
> more than a year, I'm disappointed.
> I did get a second opinion and it seemed decay in more than one tooth has
> been ignored until major work in needed.
> I did complain about pain and it was labeled gum recession and Ambesol
> was suggested. It was decay all along. And probable tooth loss.
> we're looking at $10,000+ . Probably all preventable.
Had the first dentist taken x-rays?
--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http :// www .dentaltwins,com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001
your name wrote:
> In article <8Tb4k.528$cm.28@trndny09>,
> Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldmung@dentaltwins,com > wrote:
>
>> The Webby wrote:
>>> In article <SVa4k.525$cm.275@trndny09>,
>>> Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldmung@dentaltwins,com > wrote:
>>>
>>>> your name wrote:
>>>>> If a dentist ignores a treatment plan and you consequently suffer from
>>>>> teeth damaged to the point of tooth lose and or root canals is a
>>>>> Malpractice suit in order?
>>>>> i.e. if you have lost confidence in your dentist's abilities shouldn't
>>>>> you see the dentist recommended by an attorney?
>>>> You would have to demonstrate that the dentist's action (or lack of
>>>> action) was the proximate cause of the damage. Furthermore, you would
>>>> have to demonstrate that you followed the dentists recommendations, and
>>>> that this caused the damages.
>>>> If you lose confidence in your dentist, you should see another dentist.
>>>> Going to an attorney is the last thing I'd do, not the first.
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>> I'm wondering why a dentist would ignore his/her own treatment plan in
>>> the first place.
>>>
>>> Webby
>>
>> Maybe it's the patient's own treatment plan. ;-)
>
> well, I chose the dentist but after having been under his "care" for
> more than a year, I'm disappointed.
> I did get a second opinion and it seemed decay in more than one tooth has
> been ignored until major work in needed.
> I did complain about pain and it was labeled gum recession and Ambesol
> was suggested. It was decay all along. And probable tooth loss.
> we're looking at $10,000+ . Probably all preventable.
Had the first dentist taken x-rays?
--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http :// www .dentaltwins,com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001
Re: Malpractice?
your name wrote:
Probably all preventable.
Most certainly preventable, but by whom and at what time was it
truly preventable?
D
your name wrote:
Probably all preventable.
Most certainly preventable, but by whom and at what time was it
truly preventable?
D
Re: Malpractice?
HMO or PPO ??
--
/
Amatus
/
"your name" <georgewkspam@humboldt1,com > wrote in message
news:georgewkspam-2E6064.11131812062008@sn-ip.vsrv-sjc.supernews,net ...
> In article <8Tb4k.528$cm.28@trndny09>,
> Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldmung@dentaltwins,com > wrote:
>
>> The Webby wrote:
>> > In article <SVa4k.525$cm.275@trndny09>,
>> > Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldmung@dentaltwins,com > wrote:
>> >
>> >> your name wrote:
>> >>> If a dentist ignores a treatment plan and you consequently suffer
>> >>> from
>> >>> teeth damaged to the point of tooth lose and or root canals is a
>> >>> Malpractice suit in order?
>> >>> i.e. if you have lost confidence in your dentist's abilities
>> >>> shouldn't
>> >>> you see the dentist recommended by an attorney?
>> >>
>> >> You would have to demonstrate that the dentist's action (or lack of
>> >> action) was the proximate cause of the damage. Furthermore, you would
>> >> have to demonstrate that you followed the dentists recommendations,
>> >> and
>> >> that this caused the damages.
>> >> If you lose confidence in your dentist, you should see another
>> >> dentist.
>> >> Going to an attorney is the last thing I'd do, not the first.
>> >>
>> >> Steve
>> >
>> > I'm wondering why a dentist would ignore his/her own treatment plan in
>> > the first place.
>> >
>> > Webby
>>
>>
>> Maybe it's the patient's own treatment plan. ;-)
>
> well, I chose the dentist but after having been under his "care" for
> more than a year, I'm disappointed.
> I did get a second opinion and it seemed decay in more than one tooth has
> been ignored until major work in needed.
> I did complain about pain and it was labeled gum recession and Ambesol
> was suggested. It was decay all along. And probable tooth loss.
> we're looking at $10,000+ . Probably all preventable.
> --
> If Evolution is out-lawed. Only the Out-laws will evolve.
HMO or PPO ??
--
/
Amatus
/
"your name" <georgewkspam@humboldt1,com > wrote in message
news:georgewkspam-2E6064.11131812062008@sn-ip.vsrv-sjc.supernews,net ...
> In article <8Tb4k.528$cm.28@trndny09>,
> Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldmung@dentaltwins,com > wrote:
>
>> The Webby wrote:
>> > In article <SVa4k.525$cm.275@trndny09>,
>> > Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldmung@dentaltwins,com > wrote:
>> >
>> >> your name wrote:
>> >>> If a dentist ignores a treatment plan and you consequently suffer
>> >>> from
>> >>> teeth damaged to the point of tooth lose and or root canals is a
>> >>> Malpractice suit in order?
>> >>> i.e. if you have lost confidence in your dentist's abilities
>> >>> shouldn't
>> >>> you see the dentist recommended by an attorney?
>> >>
>> >> You would have to demonstrate that the dentist's action (or lack of
>> >> action) was the proximate cause of the damage. Furthermore, you would
>> >> have to demonstrate that you followed the dentists recommendations,
>> >> and
>> >> that this caused the damages.
>> >> If you lose confidence in your dentist, you should see another
>> >> dentist.
>> >> Going to an attorney is the last thing I'd do, not the first.
>> >>
>> >> Steve
>> >
>> > I'm wondering why a dentist would ignore his/her own treatment plan in
>> > the first place.
>> >
>> > Webby
>>
>>
>> Maybe it's the patient's own treatment plan. ;-)
>
> well, I chose the dentist but after having been under his "care" for
> more than a year, I'm disappointed.
> I did get a second opinion and it seemed decay in more than one tooth has
> been ignored until major work in needed.
> I did complain about pain and it was labeled gum recession and Ambesol
> was suggested. It was decay all along. And probable tooth loss.
> we're looking at $10,000+ . Probably all preventable.
> --
> If Evolution is out-lawed. Only the Out-laws will evolve.
Re: Malpractice?
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:08:52 -0700, The Webby
<tmjiatroepidemic@cox,net > wrote:
>I'm wondering why a dentist would ignore his/her own treatment plan in
>the first place.
>
>Webby
Whose treatment plan ?
Mebbe a different dentists' ?
I smell a rotten kettle of fish.
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:08:52 -0700, The Webby
<tmjiatroepidemic@cox,net > wrote:
>I'm wondering why a dentist would ignore his/her own treatment plan in
>the first place.
>
>Webby
Whose treatment plan ?
Mebbe a different dentists' ?
I smell a rotten kettle of fish.
Re: Malpractice?
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:04:18 GMT, Mark & Steven Bornfeld
<bornfeldmung@dentaltwins,com > wrote:
>your name wrote:
>> If a dentist ignores a treatment plan and you consequently suffer from
>> teeth damaged to the point of tooth lose and or root canals is a
>> Malpractice suit in order?
>> i.e. if you have lost confidence in your dentist's abilities shouldn't
>> you see the dentist recommended by an attorney?
>
>
> You would have to demonstrate that the dentist's action (or lack of
>action) was the proximate cause of the damage. Furthermore, you would
>have to demonstrate that you followed the dentists recommendations, and
>that this caused the damages.
> If you lose confidence in your dentist, you should see another dentist.
> Going to an attorney is the last thing I'd do, not the first.
>
>Steve
My unsolicited 2¢:
If you are suffering from a heart attack don't call an attorney,
call a doctor or 911 !
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:04:18 GMT, Mark & Steven Bornfeld
<bornfeldmung@dentaltwins,com > wrote:
>your name wrote:
>> If a dentist ignores a treatment plan and you consequently suffer from
>> teeth damaged to the point of tooth lose and or root canals is a
>> Malpractice suit in order?
>> i.e. if you have lost confidence in your dentist's abilities shouldn't
>> you see the dentist recommended by an attorney?
>
>
> You would have to demonstrate that the dentist's action (or lack of
>action) was the proximate cause of the damage. Furthermore, you would
>have to demonstrate that you followed the dentists recommendations, and
>that this caused the damages.
> If you lose confidence in your dentist, you should see another dentist.
> Going to an attorney is the last thing I'd do, not the first.
>
>Steve
My unsolicited 2¢:
If you are suffering from a heart attack don't call an attorney,
call a doctor or 911 !
