Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
Panaroma xrays and lead protection in the front part of body only
I went to the dentist yesterday and he had me take a panaroma xray. He
placed a lead protection vest covering my entire front of the body
with short flaps over the shoulders. but today, i realized that the
xray was coming from around the back of my head (ear to ear) and
shooting into film that rotated in front of my face. (ie. xray was
shooting from behind my head of the teeth to the film in front of me).
Since the xrays was coming from behind my head and my back side was
not protected at all i was wondering if this meant i was exposed to
the xrays?
thanks, rj.
placed a lead protection vest covering my entire front of the body
with short flaps over the shoulders. but today, i realized that the
xray was coming from around the back of my head (ear to ear) and
shooting into film that rotated in front of my face. (ie. xray was
shooting from behind my head of the teeth to the film in front of me).
Since the xrays was coming from behind my head and my back side was
not protected at all i was wondering if this meant i was exposed to
the xrays?
thanks, rj.
The lead apron is for "show". You were not exposed to any significant
amount of radiation.
--
/
Amatus
/
"RJ" <recklezjam@gmail . com > wrote in message
news:241b18a9-aaec-490f-9976-a4fcff4b87ce@n1g2000prb.googlegroups . com ...
>I went to the dentist yesterday and he had me take a panaroma xray. He
> placed a lead protection vest covering my entire front of the body
> with short flaps over the shoulders. but today, i realized that the
> xray was coming from around the back of my head (ear to ear) and
> shooting into film that rotated in front of my face. (ie. xray was
> shooting from behind my head of the teeth to the film in front of me).
> Since the xrays was coming from behind my head and my back side was
> not protected at all i was wondering if this meant i was exposed to
> the xrays?
>
> thanks, rj.
amount of radiation.
--
/
Amatus
/
"RJ" <recklezjam@gmail . com > wrote in message
news:241b18a9-aaec-490f-9976-a4fcff4b87ce@n1g2000prb.googlegroups . com ...
>I went to the dentist yesterday and he had me take a panaroma xray. He
> placed a lead protection vest covering my entire front of the body
> with short flaps over the shoulders. but today, i realized that the
> xray was coming from around the back of my head (ear to ear) and
> shooting into film that rotated in front of my face. (ie. xray was
> shooting from behind my head of the teeth to the film in front of me).
> Since the xrays was coming from behind my head and my back side was
> not protected at all i was wondering if this meant i was exposed to
> the xrays?
>
> thanks, rj.
What do you mean its for show? Were you joking or serious? So to
confirm, was i exposed to radiation because i was not covered in the
back? thanks!
On May 4, 11:37 am, "Amatus Cremona" <Nic...@sottovocce . com > wrote:
> The lead apron is for "show". You were not exposed to any significant
> amount of radiation.
>
> --
> /
>
> Amatus
>
> /"RJ" <recklez...@gmail . com > wrote in message
>
> news:241b18a9-aaec-490f-9976-a4fcff4b87ce@n1g2000prb.googlegroups . com ...
>
> >I went to the dentist yesterday and he had me take a panaroma xray. He
> > placed a lead protection vest covering my entire front of the body
> > with short flaps over the shoulders. but today, i realized that the
> > xray was coming from around the back of my head (ear to ear) and
> > shooting into film that rotated in front of my face. (ie. xray was
> > shooting from behind my head of the teeth to the film in front of me).
> > Since the xrays was coming from behind my head and my back side was
> > not protected at all i was wondering if this meant i was exposed to
> > the xrays?
>
> > thanks, rj.
confirm, was i exposed to radiation because i was not covered in the
back? thanks!
On May 4, 11:37 am, "Amatus Cremona" <Nic...@sottovocce . com > wrote:
> The lead apron is for "show". You were not exposed to any significant
> amount of radiation.
>
> --
> /
>
> Amatus
>
> /"RJ" <recklez...@gmail . com > wrote in message
>
> news:241b18a9-aaec-490f-9976-a4fcff4b87ce@n1g2000prb.googlegroups . com ...
>
> >I went to the dentist yesterday and he had me take a panaroma xray. He
> > placed a lead protection vest covering my entire front of the body
> > with short flaps over the shoulders. but today, i realized that the
> > xray was coming from around the back of my head (ear to ear) and
> > shooting into film that rotated in front of my face. (ie. xray was
> > shooting from behind my head of the teeth to the film in front of me).
> > Since the xrays was coming from behind my head and my back side was
> > not protected at all i was wondering if this meant i was exposed to
> > the xrays?
>
> > thanks, rj.
The scattered radiation that bounces below the head is not enough to worry
about. The lead apron is there to put people's minds at ease.
--
/
Amatus
/
"RJ" <recklezjam@gmail . com > wrote in message
news:4d3e57a3-8d5e-4d80-bf90-a9b80fd382b3@s33g2000pri.googlegroups . com ...
> What do you mean its for show? Were you joking or serious? So to
> confirm, was i exposed to radiation because i was not covered in the
> back? thanks!
>
> On May 4, 11:37 am, "Amatus Cremona" <Nic...@sottovocce . com > wrote:
>> The lead apron is for "show". You were not exposed to any significant
>> amount of radiation.
>>
>> --
>> /
>>
>> Amatus
>>
>> /"RJ" <recklez...@gmail . com > wrote in message
>>
>> news:241b18a9-aaec-490f-9976-a4fcff4b87ce@n1g2000prb.googlegroups . com ...
>>
>> >I went to the dentist yesterday and he had me take a panaroma xray. He
>> > placed a lead protection vest covering my entire front of the body
>> > with short flaps over the shoulders. but today, i realized that the
>> > xray was coming from around the back of my head (ear to ear) and
>> > shooting into film that rotated in front of my face. (ie. xray was
>> > shooting from behind my head of the teeth to the film in front of me).
>> > Since the xrays was coming from behind my head and my back side was
>> > not protected at all i was wondering if this meant i was exposed to
>> > the xrays?
>>
>> > thanks, rj.
>
about. The lead apron is there to put people's minds at ease.
--
/
Amatus
/
"RJ" <recklezjam@gmail . com > wrote in message
news:4d3e57a3-8d5e-4d80-bf90-a9b80fd382b3@s33g2000pri.googlegroups . com ...
> What do you mean its for show? Were you joking or serious? So to
> confirm, was i exposed to radiation because i was not covered in the
> back? thanks!
>
> On May 4, 11:37 am, "Amatus Cremona" <Nic...@sottovocce . com > wrote:
>> The lead apron is for "show". You were not exposed to any significant
>> amount of radiation.
>>
>> --
>> /
>>
>> Amatus
>>
>> /"RJ" <recklez...@gmail . com > wrote in message
>>
>> news:241b18a9-aaec-490f-9976-a4fcff4b87ce@n1g2000prb.googlegroups . com ...
>>
>> >I went to the dentist yesterday and he had me take a panaroma xray. He
>> > placed a lead protection vest covering my entire front of the body
>> > with short flaps over the shoulders. but today, i realized that the
>> > xray was coming from around the back of my head (ear to ear) and
>> > shooting into film that rotated in front of my face. (ie. xray was
>> > shooting from behind my head of the teeth to the film in front of me).
>> > Since the xrays was coming from behind my head and my back side was
>> > not protected at all i was wondering if this meant i was exposed to
>> > the xrays?
>>
>> > thanks, rj.
>
On May 6, 1:53 pm, "Amatus Cremona" <Nic...@sottovocce . com > wrote:
> The scattered radiation that bounces below the head is not enough to worry=
> about. The lead apron is there to put people's minds at ease.
Guess what? so is that "mask" dentists wear, a lot of the mercury
dust you kick up when you drill out fillings goes right through it.
Also, you know those $100 bills your patients have been paying you
with? They
are really $1's
> The scattered radiation that bounces below the head is not enough to worry=
> about. The lead apron is there to put people's minds at ease.
Guess what? so is that "mask" dentists wear, a lot of the mercury
dust you kick up when you drill out fillings goes right through it.
Also, you know those $100 bills your patients have been paying you
with? They
are really $1's
On May 6, 1:53 pm, "Amatus Cremona" <Nic...@sottovocce . com > wrote:
> The scattered radiation that bounces below the head is not enough to worry=
> about. The lead apron is there to put people's minds at ease.
Congratulations, (siren goes off, and ballons start flying), that's
the millionth
unsubstantiated opinion on SMD, endorsed by the ADA. Four
scientifically unsubstainted opinions, in two posts = three sentences.
Gee, Your really good.
> The scattered radiation that bounces below the head is not enough to worry=
> about. The lead apron is there to put people's minds at ease.
Congratulations, (siren goes off, and ballons start flying), that's
the millionth
unsubstantiated opinion on SMD, endorsed by the ADA. Four
scientifically unsubstainted opinions, in two posts = three sentences.
Gee, Your really good.
So are you sweetie.
Hard to make 'mercury dust' cutting with a water spray.
Lose your mensa card?
D
Simplicio wrote:
> Gee, Your really good.
>
>
Hey Dartos, are you trying to reason with someone's hatred? Might as well
try talking to your tractor. Speaking of which, tomorrow, my view out the
front window of the office is a Kubota dealer.
--
/
Amatus
/
"Dartos" <tuthjockey@myturbonet . com > wrote in message
news:1210151405_67275@news.newsville . com ...
>
>
> So are you sweetie.
>
> Hard to make 'mercury dust' cutting with a water spray.
>
> Lose your mensa card?
>
> D
>
> Simplicio wrote:
>
>> Gee, Your really good.
>>
>>
>
try talking to your tractor. Speaking of which, tomorrow, my view out the
front window of the office is a Kubota dealer.
--
/
Amatus
/
"Dartos" <tuthjockey@myturbonet . com > wrote in message
news:1210151405_67275@news.newsville . com ...
>
>
> So are you sweetie.
>
> Hard to make 'mercury dust' cutting with a water spray.
>
> Lose your mensa card?
>
> D
>
> Simplicio wrote:
>
>> Gee, Your really good.
>>
>>
>
On Wed, 7 May 2008 10:03:45 -0400, "Amatus Cremona"
<Nicola@sottovocce . com > wrote:
>Hey Dartos, are you trying to reason with someone's hatred? Might as well
>try talking to your tractor. Speaking of which, tomorrow, my view out the
>front window of the office is a Kubota dealer.
Man, that must be a breath-taking sight to behold.
<Nicola@sottovocce . com > wrote:
>Hey Dartos, are you trying to reason with someone's hatred? Might as well
>try talking to your tractor. Speaking of which, tomorrow, my view out the
>front window of the office is a Kubota dealer.
Man, that must be a breath-taking sight to behold.
It is nice shade of orange
--
/
Amatus
/
<Newbie@bix.nex> wrote in message
news:q5bc249t9o1pt6vidc83lhfv950h7847hf@4ax . com ...
> On Wed, 7 May 2008 10:03:45 -0400, "Amatus Cremona"
> <Nicola@sottovocce . com > wrote:
>
>>Hey Dartos, are you trying to reason with someone's hatred? Might as well
>>try talking to your tractor. Speaking of which, tomorrow, my view out the
>>front window of the office is a Kubota dealer.
>
>
> Man, that must be a breath-taking sight to behold.
--
/
Amatus
/
<Newbie@bix.nex> wrote in message
news:q5bc249t9o1pt6vidc83lhfv950h7847hf@4ax . com ...
> On Wed, 7 May 2008 10:03:45 -0400, "Amatus Cremona"
> <Nicola@sottovocce . com > wrote:
>
>>Hey Dartos, are you trying to reason with someone's hatred? Might as well
>>try talking to your tractor. Speaking of which, tomorrow, my view out the
>>front window of the office is a Kubota dealer.
>
>
> Man, that must be a breath-taking sight to behold.
On Mon, 12 May 2008 07:19:46 -0400, "Amatus Cremona"
<Nicola@sottovocce . com > wrote:
>It is nice shade of orange
It's like a Paranormal x-perience, isn't it ?
Pan a Roma !
<Nicola@sottovocce . com > wrote:
>It is nice shade of orange
It's like a Paranormal x-perience, isn't it ?
Pan a Roma !
I'm jealous.
<G>
D
Newbie@bix.nex wrote:
> On Wed, 7 May 2008 10:03:45 -0400, "Amatus Cremona"
> <Nicola@sottovocce . com > wrote:
>
>
>>Hey Dartos, are you trying to reason with someone's hatred? Might as well
>>try talking to your tractor. Speaking of which, tomorrow, my view out the
>>front window of the office is a Kubota dealer.
>
>
>
> Man, that must be a breath-taking sight to behold.
On May 7, 8:46 am, Dartos <tuthjoc...@myturbonet . com > wrote:
> So are you sweetie.
Please don't call me "sweetie". No one who knows me would call me
that
(for good reason).
> Hard to make 'mercury dust' cutting with a water spray.
>
I don't think it is that difficult at all to create Hg vapor. Remember
that Hg isn't like most metals so it actually goes from vapor to a
solid to a liquid quite easily.The idea that the Hg remains bound to
silver throughout the drilling process is a fiction. When you drill an
amalgam and heat it, inevitably creating Hg in elemental form what %
of Hg is converted into Hg particles and then Hg in liquid form. Would
you splash water on a puddle of Hg?
Obviously It would seem that cooling the filling would reduce Hg
exposure from drilling but I would guess that 1) many dentists don't
use such a system or haven't in the past 2) It wouldn't eleminate it,
especailly with a high speed drill. 3) The patient can still ingest
the Hg (unless you've employed another advanced particulate suction
system).
.
Have you attempted to quantify what the actuall reduction in exposure
is for the patient and dentist for all three states Hg can take? Do
your ADA brochures say
how much of the pulverized amalgam is converted to elemental Hg? Do
they include a hypothetical table suchs as:
Type of equipment % of Hg converted to liquid % liquid-
vapor
Highspeed/drill
50 30
no water cooling
Low speed drill/
20 15
water cooling
Highspeed drill/
25 50
water cooling
Or do they just say, drilling fillings safe, ADA expert says so!
> So are you sweetie.
Please don't call me "sweetie". No one who knows me would call me
that
(for good reason).
> Hard to make 'mercury dust' cutting with a water spray.
>
I don't think it is that difficult at all to create Hg vapor. Remember
that Hg isn't like most metals so it actually goes from vapor to a
solid to a liquid quite easily.The idea that the Hg remains bound to
silver throughout the drilling process is a fiction. When you drill an
amalgam and heat it, inevitably creating Hg in elemental form what %
of Hg is converted into Hg particles and then Hg in liquid form. Would
you splash water on a puddle of Hg?
Obviously It would seem that cooling the filling would reduce Hg
exposure from drilling but I would guess that 1) many dentists don't
use such a system or haven't in the past 2) It wouldn't eleminate it,
especailly with a high speed drill. 3) The patient can still ingest
the Hg (unless you've employed another advanced particulate suction
system).
.
Have you attempted to quantify what the actuall reduction in exposure
is for the patient and dentist for all three states Hg can take? Do
your ADA brochures say
how much of the pulverized amalgam is converted to elemental Hg? Do
they include a hypothetical table suchs as:
Type of equipment % of Hg converted to liquid % liquid-
vapor
Highspeed/drill
50 30
no water cooling
Low speed drill/
20 15
water cooling
Highspeed drill/
25 50
water cooling
Or do they just say, drilling fillings safe, ADA expert says so!
You said DUST.
Steve
>>Hard to make 'mercury dust' cutting with a water spray.
> I don't think it is that difficult at all to create Hg vapor.
On May 7, 11:15 pm, Steven Fawks <tuthjoc...@myturbonet . com > wrote:
> You said DUST.
>
I'm sure many dentists use or have used unsafe methods for drilling
out fillings, in that they do not use or maximize water cooling. I
don't know what methods
you personally use. I was not refering specifically to you. Maybe you
have the most advanced water cooling, particle removal, oxygen mask/
air filtering system on the planet.
If a general dental standard exists requiring the use of water
cooling ( I hate to use the words "dental standard", because I know
none exists when it comes to Hg exposure and the ADA itself defends
itself in court as a trade organization) I'd sure like to see it, and
I would be very curios to see how or why that is rationalized in terms
of Hg exposure to the patient or dentist.
> You said DUST.
>
I'm sure many dentists use or have used unsafe methods for drilling
out fillings, in that they do not use or maximize water cooling. I
don't know what methods
you personally use. I was not refering specifically to you. Maybe you
have the most advanced water cooling, particle removal, oxygen mask/
air filtering system on the planet.
If a general dental standard exists requiring the use of water
cooling ( I hate to use the words "dental standard", because I know
none exists when it comes to Hg exposure and the ADA itself defends
itself in court as a trade organization) I'd sure like to see it, and
I would be very curios to see how or why that is rationalized in terms
of Hg exposure to the patient or dentist.
