Re: Do Pharmaceutical Commercials Benefit Americans?On Sat, 17 May 2008 17:26:17 -0700 (PDT), Tim Campbell <timcall@sbcglobal,net > wrote:
>
>
>On this week’s JOURNAL, Bill Moyers spoke with Melody Petersen, an
>independent journalist who formerly covered the drug industry for the
>NEW YORK TIMES and is author of OUR DAILY MEDS: HOW THE
>PHARMACEUTICAL
>COMPANIES TRANSFORMED THEMSELVES INTO SLICK MARKETING MACHINES AND
>HOOKED THE NATION ON PRESCRIPTION DRUGS.
>Addressing how advertising and marketing have affected the
>prescription drug business, Petersen said:
>
>
>“A very powerful technique that the drug companies spend millions and
>millions of dollars on is hiring physicians to give lectures to other
>physicians on their drugs. It looks like the physician is up there
>giving his independent position on this drug, but often he’s been
>trained by an advertising agency. His slide presentation has been
>created by an ad agency. It looks like independent science, but it’s
>not... They want to get as many articles published in our medical
>journals as they can that show their products in favorable lights and
>will get physicians to prescribe them, so they often hire a Madison
>Avenue ad agency to write up an article for them or a study. The name
>of the ad agency rarely appears in the published version; instead,
>they hire doctors to put their names on as author... It’s gone so far
>that some independent scientists are starting to view our medical
>literature as propaganda.”
How much of it is not, if any?
>Others, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), argue
>that “direct to consumer” ads help educate and engage prospective
>patients about their healthcare options.
>
>
> http :// www .pbs.org/moyers/journal/blog/