Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
On Open Minds (for the Bates crew)
On Open Minds (for the Bates crew)
In the other thread I started, one of the Bates aficionados said
that I need to have an "open mind".
I fully agree. I think it's a very important thing, which is why
I always try to maintain an open mind.
But not so open that my brain falls out.
:-)
In the other thread I started, one of the Bates aficionados said
that I need to have an "open mind".
I fully agree. I think it's a very important thing, which is why
I always try to maintain an open mind.
But not so open that my brain falls out.
:-)
Re: On Open Minds (for the Bates crew)
While Bates was indeed "vocal" on the subject of PREVENTION, he was
not the only doctor recommending preventive methods. So if
you wish to keep an "open mind" you might enjoy reading
the true second-opinion about the proven effect of a strong
minus on the refractive STATE of the eye as expressed
by Steve Leung OD:
www .chinamyopia.org
Enjoy,
On Apr 7, 6:02 pm, z...@gfred.fde (John Sheridan) wrote:
> In the other thread I started, one of the Bates aficionados said
> that I need to have an "open mind".
>
> I fully agree. I think it's a very important thing, which is why
> I always try to maintain an open mind.
>
> But not so open that my brain falls out.
>
> :-)
While Bates was indeed "vocal" on the subject of PREVENTION, he was
not the only doctor recommending preventive methods. So if
you wish to keep an "open mind" you might enjoy reading
the true second-opinion about the proven effect of a strong
minus on the refractive STATE of the eye as expressed
by Steve Leung OD:
www .chinamyopia.org
Enjoy,
On Apr 7, 6:02 pm, z...@gfred.fde (John Sheridan) wrote:
> In the other thread I started, one of the Bates aficionados said
> that I need to have an "open mind".
>
> I fully agree. I think it's a very important thing, which is why
> I always try to maintain an open mind.
>
> But not so open that my brain falls out.
>
> :-)
Re: On Open Minds (for the Bates crew)
Another good review is to listen to the ODs who
have cleared their vision from -3 diopters to normal. See:
http :// www .optometrists.org/Boston/articles.html
Enjoy,
On Apr 7, 6:02 pm, z...@gfred.fde (John Sheridan) wrote:
> In the other thread I started, one of the Bates aficionados said
> that I need to have an "open mind".
>
> I fully agree. I think it's a very important thing, which is why
> I always try to maintain an open mind.
>
> But not so open that my brain falls out.
>
> :-)
Another good review is to listen to the ODs who
have cleared their vision from -3 diopters to normal. See:
http :// www .optometrists.org/Boston/articles.html
Enjoy,
On Apr 7, 6:02 pm, z...@gfred.fde (John Sheridan) wrote:
> In the other thread I started, one of the Bates aficionados said
> that I need to have an "open mind".
>
> I fully agree. I think it's a very important thing, which is why
> I always try to maintain an open mind.
>
> But not so open that my brain falls out.
>
> :-)
Re: On Open Minds (for the Bates crew)
Or perhaps a video might help -- if your
brain has alread fallen out:
http :// www .preventmyopia.org/animation.html
Enjoy,
On Apr 7, 6:02 pm, z...@gfred.fde (John Sheridan) wrote:
> In the other thread I started, one of the Bates aficionados said
> that I need to have an "open mind".
>
> I fully agree. I think it's a very important thing, which is why
> I always try to maintain an open mind.
>
> But not so open that my brain falls out.
>
> :-)
Or perhaps a video might help -- if your
brain has alread fallen out:
http :// www .preventmyopia.org/animation.html
Enjoy,
On Apr 7, 6:02 pm, z...@gfred.fde (John Sheridan) wrote:
> In the other thread I started, one of the Bates aficionados said
> that I need to have an "open mind".
>
> I fully agree. I think it's a very important thing, which is why
> I always try to maintain an open mind.
>
> But not so open that my brain falls out.
>
> :-)
Re: On Open Minds (for the Bates crew)
You'll have to excuse Otis.
He's ... well ... he's ... just an idiot, really.
You'll have to excuse Otis.
He's ... well ... he's ... just an idiot, really.
Re: On Open Minds (for the Bates crew)
On 7 Apr, 23:02, z...@gfred.fde (John Sheridan) wrote:
> In the other thread I started, one of the Bates aficionados said
> that I need to have an "open mind".
>
> I fully agree. I think it's a very important thing, which is why
> I always try to maintain an open mind.
>
> But not so open that my brain falls out.
>
> :-)
That joke is so old... >.<
You just tried to morph it into your own post and take credit for
making it up... Gosh!
On 7 Apr, 23:02, z...@gfred.fde (John Sheridan) wrote:
> In the other thread I started, one of the Bates aficionados said
> that I need to have an "open mind".
>
> I fully agree. I think it's a very important thing, which is why
> I always try to maintain an open mind.
>
> But not so open that my brain falls out.
>
> :-)
That joke is so old... >.<
You just tried to morph it into your own post and take credit for
making it up... Gosh!
Re: On Open Minds (for the Bates crew)
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 01:37:40 -0700 (PDT), Zetsu <absolutelyinvincible@hotmail,com > wrote:
>
>That joke is so old... >.<
>You just tried to morph it into your own post and take credit for
>making it up... Gosh!
Of course everyone knows it's just an old joke. I still couldn't
resist posting it because it describes you Bates true believers so
well.
You know, there are plenty of people out there who truly believe
that the Earth is only 6,000 years old, that the Moon landings were
faked, and the Holocaust never really happened. Why don't you go post
in one of their forums and leave us alone?
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 01:37:40 -0700 (PDT), Zetsu <absolutelyinvincible@hotmail,com > wrote:
>
>That joke is so old... >.<
>You just tried to morph it into your own post and take credit for
>making it up... Gosh!
Of course everyone knows it's just an old joke. I still couldn't
resist posting it because it describes you Bates true believers so
well.
You know, there are plenty of people out there who truly believe
that the Earth is only 6,000 years old, that the Moon landings were
faked, and the Holocaust never really happened. Why don't you go post
in one of their forums and leave us alone?
Re: On Open Minds (for the Bates crew)
On 8 Apr, 11:00, z...@gfred.fde (John Sheridan) wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 01:37:40 -0700 (PDT), Zetsu <absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail,com > wrote:
>
> >That joke is so old... >.<
> >You just tried to morph it into your own post and take credit for
> >making it up... Gosh!
>
> Of course everyone knows it's just an old joke. I still couldn't
> resist posting it because it describes you Bates true believers so
> well.
So you took the trouble to open up a whole new thread just for that?
On 8 Apr, 11:00, z...@gfred.fde (John Sheridan) wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 01:37:40 -0700 (PDT), Zetsu <absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail,com > wrote:
>
> >That joke is so old... >.<
> >You just tried to morph it into your own post and take credit for
> >making it up... Gosh!
>
> Of course everyone knows it's just an old joke. I still couldn't
> resist posting it because it describes you Bates true believers so
> well.
So you took the trouble to open up a whole new thread just for that?
Re: On Open Minds (for the Bates crew)
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 05:12:06 -0700 (PDT), Zetsu <absolutelyinvincible@hotmail,com > wrote:
>
>So you took the trouble to open up a whole new thread just for that?
>
Let me get this straight. *You* are criticizing *me* for opening
a frivolous thread?
You have opened a whole slew of threads that say a lot less than
mine does.
Go and post in the groups I mentioned before - you don't belong
in a sci. group. What you post isn't science.
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 05:12:06 -0700 (PDT), Zetsu <absolutelyinvincible@hotmail,com > wrote:
>
>So you took the trouble to open up a whole new thread just for that?
>
Let me get this straight. *You* are criticizing *me* for opening
a frivolous thread?
You have opened a whole slew of threads that say a lot less than
mine does.
Go and post in the groups I mentioned before - you don't belong
in a sci. group. What you post isn't science.
Re: On Open Minds (for the Bates crew)
On 8 Apr, 21:32, z...@gfred.fde (John Sheridan) wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 05:12:06 -0700 (PDT), Zetsu <absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail,com > wrote:
>
> >So you took the trouble to open up a whole new thread just for that?
>
> Let me get this straight. *You* are criticizing *me* for opening
> a frivolous thread?
Yes.
On 8 Apr, 21:32, z...@gfred.fde (John Sheridan) wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 05:12:06 -0700 (PDT), Zetsu <absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail,com > wrote:
>
> >So you took the trouble to open up a whole new thread just for that?
>
> Let me get this straight. *You* are criticizing *me* for opening
> a frivolous thread?
Yes.
