Re: The Future is Full SpectrumZetsu wrote:
> In the future I think everyone will be using these bulbs (for
> conservation of energy etc.). So you might as well switch now! Because
> they pay for themselves over time in comparison to the amount you
> would have paid for an incandescent non-energy saving bulb. The
> futuristic world is a bright, white one!
First of all, I use a lot of them and they don't last near as long as
they claim. They also grow duller after a few months. Put one in the
fan light and they wear out even faster from the constant movement of
the fans. In my area of the world where it goes below freezing in the
winter months, florescent lights turn on slower and take several minutes
to warm up to full light. I have three 300 watt equivalent florescent
lights in my garage and it is still not that bright during the few
minutes one uses the garage in the winter time.
> Eastern countries (such as Bangladesh) are already using these bulbs.
> It's western countries that are slipping behind in the technology!
No, it's not a matter of slipping behind, it's a matter of cost and what
one is used to. Incandescent lights provide a light I'm used to, the
cost is really cheap, and I've had electricity all my life so I'm used
to it. I couldn't care less what Bangladesh uses for their one light
bulb per hundred people and where electricity is no where near as
prevalent (and exaggeration, perhaps). If price was no object, I would
be using LED lights - now that's energy efficient!
I would prefer a light source that mimics the spectral changes in the
sun from sunrise to sunset with very low light levels before sunrise and
after sunset would be ideal. A full spectrum light when your replying
to email right before going to bed fucks up one's natural cycles no doubt.
--
Pramesh Rutaji
p297tongue6221@newsguy,com - remove tongue to reply