Group: sci.med.vision

Human vision, visual correction, and visual science.

Add group to favorites Add group to favorites
   indietro Back to post list     indietro Send new message to group
Search:

Post Subject:

Comparison of laser vs non-laser glaucoma treatment?

Reply from: Salmon Egg
Date: 15 May 2008, 07:34
Comparison of laser vs non-laser glaucoma treatment?

I am having unstable IOP. In addition,the preservative BAK in my eye
drops appear to be giving me trouble. I finally decided that
surgery,trabeculectomy is the way to go. My left eye suffers severe
reduction of central vision because of a central retinal vein occlusion.
The trabeculectomy is to be done on my "good" rightey to preserve its
central vision. Needless to say, this makes me nervous.

I was surprised to find out that the surgery is planned to be true
cutting rather than laser based. I was under the impression--perhaps
incorrectly--that laser treatment avoided much of the risk associated
with actual cutting. Where can I get a good comparison of the pros and
cons of laser surgery as opposed to scalpel surgery? I want to be armed
with knowledge when I ask more questions.

Bill

Reply from: Don W
Date: 15 May 2008, 19:49
Re: Comparison of laser vs non-laser glaucoma treatment?

I have a non-surgery bias. Just how unstable is the IOP? And could
other eye drops not using BAK be tried? I am a Xalatan user and "side
effects" don't seem to be a problem. Uses BAK as I understand. What
effects are you having?

Don W.





"Salmon Egg" <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal,net > wrote in message
news:SalmonEgg-471E9D.22343614052008@news.la.sbcglobal,net ...
>I am having unstable IOP. In addition,the preservative BAK in my eye
> drops appear to be giving me trouble. I finally decided that
> surgery,trabeculectomy is the way to go. My left eye suffers severe
> reduction of central vision because of a central retinal vein occlusion.
> The trabeculectomy is to be done on my "good" rightey to preserve its
> central vision. Needless to say, this makes me nervous.
>
> I was surprised to find out that the surgery is planned to be true
> cutting rather than laser based. I was under the impression--perhaps
> incorrectly--that laser treatment avoided much of the risk associated
> with actual cutting. Where can I get a good comparison of the pros and
> cons of laser surgery as opposed to scalpel surgery? I want to be armed
> with knowledge when I ask more questions.
>
> Bill



Reply from: Irv Arons
Date: 23 May 2008, 04:27
Re: Comparison of laser vs non-laser glaucoma treatment?

On May 15, 1:34 am, Salmon Egg <Salmon...@sbcglobal,net > wrote:
> I am having unstable IOP. In addition,the preservative BAK in my eye
> drops appear to be giving me trouble. I finally decided that
> surgery,trabeculectomy is the way to go. My left eye suffers severe
> reduction of central vision because of a central retinal vein occlusion.
> The trabeculectomy is to be done on my "good" rightey to preserve its
> central vision. Needless to say, this makes me nervous.
>
> I was surprised to find out that the surgery is planned to be true
> cutting rather than laser based. I was under the impression--perhaps
> incorrectly--that laser treatment avoided much of the risk associated
> with actual cutting. Where can I get a good comparison of the pros and
> cons of laser surgery as opposed to scalpel surgery? I want to be armed
> with knowledge when I ask more questions.
>
> Bill

Bill,

I have written about a good laser treatment for glaucoma called
SLT(selective laser trabeculoplasty).

Here is a link to my latest post on the subject:

http :// irvaronsjournal.blogspot,com /2006/11/update-on-use-of-slt-for-treating.html

Irv Arons

Reply from: Irv Arons
Date: 23 May 2008, 04:27
Re: Comparison of laser vs non-laser glaucoma treatment?

On May 15, 1:34 am, Salmon Egg <Salmon...@sbcglobal,net > wrote:
> I am having unstable IOP. In addition,the preservative BAK in my eye
> drops appear to be giving me trouble. I finally decided that
> surgery,trabeculectomy is the way to go. My left eye suffers severe
> reduction of central vision because of a central retinal vein occlusion.
> The trabeculectomy is to be done on my "good" rightey to preserve its
> central vision. Needless to say, this makes me nervous.
>
> I was surprised to find out that the surgery is planned to be true
> cutting rather than laser based. I was under the impression--perhaps
> incorrectly--that laser treatment avoided much of the risk associated
> with actual cutting. Where can I get a good comparison of the pros and
> cons of laser surgery as opposed to scalpel surgery? I want to be armed
> with knowledge when I ask more questions.
>
> Bill

Bill,

I have written about a good laser treatment for glaucoma called
SLT(selective laser trabeculoplasty).

Here is a link to my latest post on the subject:

http :// irvaronsjournal.blogspot,com /2006/11/update-on-use-of-slt-for-treating.html

Irv Arons




Login:
  Username:    Password: 
 
   Lost Password? click here!
Thread: