Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
Best Measurement?
Re: Best Measurement?
Zetsu wrote:
> What's the best measurement of eyesight?
How many children you've had! <grin> (the purpose of genes are to
reproduce themselves)
--
Pramesh Rutaji
p297tongue6221@newsguy,com - remove tongue to reply
Zetsu wrote:
> What's the best measurement of eyesight?
How many children you've had! <grin> (the purpose of genes are to
reproduce themselves)
--
Pramesh Rutaji
p297tongue6221@newsguy,com - remove tongue to reply
Re: Best Measurement?
On Sun, 25 May 2008 23:51:28 -0600, Pramesh Rutaji
<p297tongue6221@newsguy,com > wrote in <news:g1dj590n3@news2.newsguy,com >:
> Zetsu wrote:
>> What's the best measurement of eyesight?
>
> How many children you've had! <grin> (the purpose of genes are to
> reproduce themselves)
So tell us, what is the purpose of shorts?
--
- Nic.
On Sun, 25 May 2008 23:51:28 -0600, Pramesh Rutaji
<p297tongue6221@newsguy,com > wrote in <news:g1dj590n3@news2.newsguy,com >:
> Zetsu wrote:
>> What's the best measurement of eyesight?
>
> How many children you've had! <grin> (the purpose of genes are to
> reproduce themselves)
So tell us, what is the purpose of shorts?
--
- Nic.
Re: Best Measurement?
Come on, I asked a simple question!
So please give a proper answer!
Come on, I asked a simple question!
So please give a proper answer!
Re: Best Measurement?
"Zetsu" <absolutelyinvincible@hotmail,com > wrote
> Come on, I asked a simple question!
> So please give a proper answer!
Two fallacious assumptions here.
You assume every simple question has simple answers.
You assume we are here to do your homework for you.
The answer you're probably looking for is "vernier acuity."
But I don't know anyone who uses vernier acuity in the refracting lane or in
school screenings.
"Best" might mean "easiest to understand."
"Best" might mean "most universally available."
"Best" might mean "hardest to fool."
"Best" might mean "most sensitive."
"Best" might mean "static" or "dynamic".
"Best" might mean "central" or "parafoveal" or "peripheral"
All those criteria demand different answers.
When ordering up a glass of knowledge, please specify your flavor.
Do you prefer yours with the floating turds, or without?
-MT
"Zetsu" <absolutelyinvincible@hotmail,com > wrote
> Come on, I asked a simple question!
> So please give a proper answer!
Two fallacious assumptions here.
You assume every simple question has simple answers.
You assume we are here to do your homework for you.
The answer you're probably looking for is "vernier acuity."
But I don't know anyone who uses vernier acuity in the refracting lane or in
school screenings.
"Best" might mean "easiest to understand."
"Best" might mean "most universally available."
"Best" might mean "hardest to fool."
"Best" might mean "most sensitive."
"Best" might mean "static" or "dynamic".
"Best" might mean "central" or "parafoveal" or "peripheral"
All those criteria demand different answers.
When ordering up a glass of knowledge, please specify your flavor.
Do you prefer yours with the floating turds, or without?
-MT
Re: Best Measurement?
Hello Mike,
I just stumbled across this group and I do love your answer here!!!
>
> "Best" might mean "easiest to understand."
>
> "Best" might mean "most universally available."
>
> "Best" might mean "hardest to fool."
>
> "Best" might mean "most sensitive."
>
> "Best" might mean "static" or "dynamic".
>
> "Best" might mean "central" or "parafoveal" or "peripheral"
very good!
greetings,
B.
sort of a prof. in that field
Hello Mike,
I just stumbled across this group and I do love your answer here!!!
>
> "Best" might mean "easiest to understand."
>
> "Best" might mean "most universally available."
>
> "Best" might mean "hardest to fool."
>
> "Best" might mean "most sensitive."
>
> "Best" might mean "static" or "dynamic".
>
> "Best" might mean "central" or "parafoveal" or "peripheral"
very good!
greetings,
B.
sort of a prof. in that field
Re: Best Measurement?
Zetsu wrote:
> wel wen i said best i meant BEST FOR ALL THINGS
Don't you realize that there are trade offs between different kinds of
sight and that it is not possible to get the BEST vision for
simultaneously for each kind of sight?
Would you move your eyes to the side of your head to make your vision
better for one kind of seeing but make it worse for another?
It's like asking, what is the best kind of car? Do you mean speed, or
acceleration, or passenger capacity, or color, or hauling capacity, or
performance, or comfy ride, or fuel efficiency, or fuel type, or fuel
capacity, or electronic gear, or navigation, or hight of ride, or
distance per fill up, or longer warranty, or reliability, or least
likely to be stolen, or visibility, or backup assistance, or, or, or, or
...?
Perhaps you can see, trade offs exist in almost all choices and getting
the BEST vision depends on what aspect of VISION you want to be BEST in
while understanding that you will have to compromise on other vision
aspects.
--
Pramesh Rutaji
p297tongue6221@newsguy,com - remove tongue to reply
Zetsu wrote:
> wel wen i said best i meant BEST FOR ALL THINGS
Don't you realize that there are trade offs between different kinds of
sight and that it is not possible to get the BEST vision for
simultaneously for each kind of sight?
Would you move your eyes to the side of your head to make your vision
better for one kind of seeing but make it worse for another?
It's like asking, what is the best kind of car? Do you mean speed, or
acceleration, or passenger capacity, or color, or hauling capacity, or
performance, or comfy ride, or fuel efficiency, or fuel type, or fuel
capacity, or electronic gear, or navigation, or hight of ride, or
distance per fill up, or longer warranty, or reliability, or least
likely to be stolen, or visibility, or backup assistance, or, or, or, or
...?
Perhaps you can see, trade offs exist in almost all choices and getting
the BEST vision depends on what aspect of VISION you want to be BEST in
while understanding that you will have to compromise on other vision
aspects.
--
Pramesh Rutaji
p297tongue6221@newsguy,com - remove tongue to reply
Re: Best Measurement?
On 18 Jun, 16:54, Pramesh Rutaji <p297tongue6...@newsguy,com > wrote:
> Zetsu wrote:
> > wel wen i said best i meant BEST FOR ALL THINGS
>
> Don't you realize that there are trade offs between different kinds of
> sight and that it is not possible to get the BEST vision for
> simultaneously for each kind of sight?
>
> Would you move your eyes to the side of your head to make your vision
> better for one kind of seeing but make it worse for another?
>
> It's like asking, what is the best kind of car? Do you mean speed, or
> acceleration, or passenger capacity, or color, or hauling capacity, or
> performance, or comfy ride, or fuel efficiency, or fuel type, or fuel
> capacity, or electronic gear, or navigation, or hight of ride, or
> distance per fill up, or longer warranty, or reliability, or least
> likely to be stolen, or visibility, or backup assistance, or, or, or, or
> ...?
>
> Perhaps you can see, trade offs exist in almost all choices and getting
> the BEST vision depends on what aspect of VISION you want to be BEST in
> while understanding that you will have to compromise on other vision
> aspects.
>
> --
>
> Pramesh Rutaji
>
> p297tongue6...@newsguy,com - remove tongue to reply
FERRARI DUHHH
On 18 Jun, 16:54, Pramesh Rutaji <p297tongue6...@newsguy,com > wrote:
> Zetsu wrote:
> > wel wen i said best i meant BEST FOR ALL THINGS
>
> Don't you realize that there are trade offs between different kinds of
> sight and that it is not possible to get the BEST vision for
> simultaneously for each kind of sight?
>
> Would you move your eyes to the side of your head to make your vision
> better for one kind of seeing but make it worse for another?
>
> It's like asking, what is the best kind of car? Do you mean speed, or
> acceleration, or passenger capacity, or color, or hauling capacity, or
> performance, or comfy ride, or fuel efficiency, or fuel type, or fuel
> capacity, or electronic gear, or navigation, or hight of ride, or
> distance per fill up, or longer warranty, or reliability, or least
> likely to be stolen, or visibility, or backup assistance, or, or, or, or
> ...?
>
> Perhaps you can see, trade offs exist in almost all choices and getting
> the BEST vision depends on what aspect of VISION you want to be BEST in
> while understanding that you will have to compromise on other vision
> aspects.
>
> --
>
> Pramesh Rutaji
>
> p297tongue6...@newsguy,com - remove tongue to reply
FERRARI DUHHH
Re: Best Measurement?
Zetsu wrote:
> On 18 Jun, 16:54, Pramesh Rutaji <p297tongue6...@newsguy,com > wrote:
>> Zetsu wrote:
>>> wel wen i said best i meant BEST FOR ALL THINGS
>> Don't you realize that there are trade offs between different kinds of
>> sight and that it is not possible to get the BEST vision for
>> simultaneously for each kind of sight?
>>
>> Would you move your eyes to the side of your head to make your vision
>> better for one kind of seeing but make it worse for another?
>>
>> It's like asking, what is the best kind of car? Do you mean speed, or
>> acceleration, or passenger capacity, or color, or hauling capacity, or
>> performance, or comfy ride, or fuel efficiency, or fuel type, or fuel
>> capacity, or electronic gear, or navigation, or hight of ride, or
>> distance per fill up, or longer warranty, or reliability, or least
>> likely to be stolen, or visibility, or backup assistance, or, or, or, or
>> ...?
>>
>> Perhaps you can see, trade offs exist in almost all choices and getting
>> the BEST vision depends on what aspect of VISION you want to be BEST in
>> while understanding that you will have to compromise on other vision
>> aspects.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Pramesh Rutaji
>>
>> p297tongue6...@newsguy,com - remove tongue to reply
>
> FERRARI DUHHH
Can you afford the Gas and the Tires that frequently need replacement
and additionally the insurance? Heck, if someone GAVE you a Ferrari,
the government would likely force you to pay gift taxes and if you were
gifted enough money to deal with the tax issue, I doubt you could afford
the maintenance and insurance.
I was watching a car show one evening and the host was test driving a
very fast car. He wanted to take it as fast as it would go but the
tires at that speed would only last 10 minutes and cost a significant
sum of money.
The BEST car for you is likely something else, perhaps a bike.
--
Pramesh Rutaji
p297tongue6221@newsguy,com - remove tongue to reply
Zetsu wrote:
> On 18 Jun, 16:54, Pramesh Rutaji <p297tongue6...@newsguy,com > wrote:
>> Zetsu wrote:
>>> wel wen i said best i meant BEST FOR ALL THINGS
>> Don't you realize that there are trade offs between different kinds of
>> sight and that it is not possible to get the BEST vision for
>> simultaneously for each kind of sight?
>>
>> Would you move your eyes to the side of your head to make your vision
>> better for one kind of seeing but make it worse for another?
>>
>> It's like asking, what is the best kind of car? Do you mean speed, or
>> acceleration, or passenger capacity, or color, or hauling capacity, or
>> performance, or comfy ride, or fuel efficiency, or fuel type, or fuel
>> capacity, or electronic gear, or navigation, or hight of ride, or
>> distance per fill up, or longer warranty, or reliability, or least
>> likely to be stolen, or visibility, or backup assistance, or, or, or, or
>> ...?
>>
>> Perhaps you can see, trade offs exist in almost all choices and getting
>> the BEST vision depends on what aspect of VISION you want to be BEST in
>> while understanding that you will have to compromise on other vision
>> aspects.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Pramesh Rutaji
>>
>> p297tongue6...@newsguy,com - remove tongue to reply
>
> FERRARI DUHHH
Can you afford the Gas and the Tires that frequently need replacement
and additionally the insurance? Heck, if someone GAVE you a Ferrari,
the government would likely force you to pay gift taxes and if you were
gifted enough money to deal with the tax issue, I doubt you could afford
the maintenance and insurance.
I was watching a car show one evening and the host was test driving a
very fast car. He wanted to take it as fast as it would go but the
tires at that speed would only last 10 minutes and cost a significant
sum of money.
The BEST car for you is likely something else, perhaps a bike.
--
Pramesh Rutaji
p297tongue6221@newsguy,com - remove tongue to reply
Re: Best Measurement?
On May 25, 7:27 pm, Zetsu <absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail,com > wrote:
> What's the best measurement of eyesight?
What do you mean by "measure of eyesight" and what do you mean by
"best".
Do you mean acuity? or refractive error? or ability to differentiate
between two similar objects? or ......
Judy
On May 25, 7:27 pm, Zetsu <absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail,com > wrote:
> What's the best measurement of eyesight?
What do you mean by "measure of eyesight" and what do you mean by
"best".
Do you mean acuity? or refractive error? or ability to differentiate
between two similar objects? or ......
Judy
Re: Best Measurement?
By measure of eyesight I meant, what's the best way to measure how
clearly you can see.
By measure of eyesight I meant, what's the best way to measure how
clearly you can see.
Re: Best Measurement?
"Zetsu" <absolutelyinvincible@hotmail,com > wrote
> By measure of eyesight I meant, what's the best way to measure how
> clearly you can see.
Do you mean under full spectrum light?
-MT
"Zetsu" <absolutelyinvincible@hotmail,com > wrote
> By measure of eyesight I meant, what's the best way to measure how
> clearly you can see.
Do you mean under full spectrum light?
-MT
Re: Best Measurement?
On May 27, 8:31 am, Zetsu <absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail,com > wrote:
> By measure of eyesight I meant, what's the best way to measure how
> clearly you can see.
The most accurate measures would be a vernier type visual acuity test
and contrast sensitivity test. These are not commonly available
outside of research labs.
Judy
On May 27, 8:31 am, Zetsu <absolutelyinvinci...@hotmail,com > wrote:
> By measure of eyesight I meant, what's the best way to measure how
> clearly you can see.
The most accurate measures would be a vernier type visual acuity test
and contrast sensitivity test. These are not commonly available
outside of research labs.
Judy
