Re: How to perform retinoscopyOn 2 May, 05:19, douglas <Protoman2...@gmail,com > wrote:
> On May 1, 8:57 pm, Nicolaas Hawkins <grumpy.m...@t.large> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Thu, 1 May 2008 20:13:59 -0700 (PDT), douglas <Protoman2...@gmail,com >
> > wrote in
> > <news:5d244175-649c-4814-8eff-174204fe5074@d19g2000prm.googlegroups,com >:
>
> > > Well...thanks, but I most definitely am *not* entitled to use those
> > > postnominals...I'm only 16.5 years old --and am an undergrad at
> > > Cerritos College--, and I plan on being a medical doctor, either an
> > > internal medicine subspecialist, or an ophthalmologist. If I do become
> > > a medical ophthalmologist and/or ophthalmic surgeon, I'll most
> > > definitely try for those degrees and qualifications. And, since the
> > > fictional --merely shares my name--
>
> > Well, thank you - I DON'T think! - for so comprehensvely making a fool of
> > me. Quite a clever ruse - you should score high marks for disingenuity.
>
> > > consultant medical ophthalmologist and ophthalmic surgeon has a "DM"
> > > instead an "MD", and an "MCh", instead of a "ChM" that means he
> > > recieved his Bachelor of Medicine and Surgery, Doctor of Medicine, and
> > > Master of Surgery from The University of Oxford; erudite guy, he is.
> > > And, if I was who you were thinking of for that split second, why, pray
> > > tell, would I be asking *this* question, let alone on Usenet?
>
> > That question has already been answered.
>
> > > And I believe that Dr Sartorius is entitled to use the honorific of
> > > "Doctor", since FRCP is an older qualification --RCPLond established
> > > way before RCSEng--, thus it has higher precedence in the wonderfully
> > > long table of British honors, degrees, and qualifications, so FRCP
> > > outranks FRCS.
>
> > Not the easiest of things to keep up with from twenty-five thousand
> > kilometres away on the other side of the world! Though I did think the DM
> > and MCh were a little odd compared to the more usual (at least in this
> > part of the world) MD ChM or MB ChB - however you being in the UK and me
> > not, I thought it may have been some local custom.
>
> > > And what of my static retinoscopy vs. autorefractor question? Please
> > > answer this.
>
> > No. You will get no answer from me on this - I do not even pretend to
> > have any qualifications in the field of optometry.
>
> > --
> > - Nic.
>
> Um, I'm also in the USA...I just plan on studying medicine in the UK.
Wow! You can come visit me! I live in the UK!
Have you decided which Uni you want to apply for?
On 2 May, 05:18, Dr Judy <mpac...@rogers,com > wrote:
> On May 1, 8:39 pm, douglas <Protoman2...@gmail,com > wrote:
>
> > O>
> > So, a comparison of static retinoscopy and autorefraction is in order.
> > Is SR better then AR, worse, or equal?
>
> With cyclopleged eyes, they give about the same result. Glasses
> prescriptions will usually be based on subjective refraction, not SR
> or AR.
>
> > Oh, and in England, if you're a consultant ophthalmologist and
> > ophthalmic surgeon, and are named "Douglas K. Sartorius, DM, MCh,
> > FRCP, FRCS, FRCOphth", are you addressed as "Doctor", or "Mister"?
>
> You'll have to ask someone locally. I seem to remember that Mr
> carries more prestige in England, and that professors of medicine are
> called Mr, while mere run of the mill MDs are called Dr.
>
> Judy
Well, I am a local from the UK, and from my personal and experiential
perspective, 'Mister' is a lot less prestiguous sounding than
'Doctor'! But then we have other titles that are really high up, like
'Sir', or 'Lord', or 'Your Highness'. OK, I made the last one up.
Anyway, I doubt there's a lot of difference between here and the US. I
mean, it's us Brits who discovered your land in the first place isn't
it? Oh well, I can't remember (not a good historian).